Springer is Gutless
I hope you guys are proud of your coward pitcher throwing at Bonds. If he did not want to give up 714 he should have tried to get Bonds out. He is a complete loser just like all of the Astros fans that cheered when Bonds got hit. What a disgrace.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Only
Gutless? Barry Bonds is the one without guts, the one who wouldn't allow himself to face the competition without a crutch.
Those who champion Bonds need to get a new ploy: the guy isn't even the most dangerous slugger on his own team anymore, and if the Astros were to throw at anyone (and I don't think they were) we should have thrown at Pedro Feliz.
I won't rise to the provocation offered in calling Houston fans "losers," but let's just say that they were appreciative of life's just desserts. Pretty standard behavior around the league these days, I'd think.
Fact is, nobody likes your guy anymore. He's an arrogant liar and an unrepetant cheat.
No-one likes that. That's why they root for him to fail and cheer in situations where he is embarassed.
End of story.
by rastronomicals on May 17, 2006 11:46 AM CDT reply actions
Nobody ever liked "my guy"
by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on May 18, 2006 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions
I Don't Understand the Argument
And simply because we don't have the positive test, the probability that Bonds has used is something less than 100%.
I understand that and am willing to make moral judgements based on certitude less than 100%.
But that absotively, posilutely does not make their levels of justified suspicion equivalent.
I can't think of any system under which Biggio can possibly be equally guilty as Bonds with the level of knowledge that we have. And certainly the fact that our knowledge is incomplete can't make him any more guilty than he would have been otherwise.
How can it?
I'm not sure who Marcus Vick is, sorry.
I was thinking about the crowd cheering, and struggled with it a bit. But I came to the conclusion that had I been at MMP, I probably would have cheered as well. Not as a tacit admission that Springer was throwing at him (he wasn't!), but rather in appreciation of the little irony expressed that sometimes people get what's coming to them, despite the fact that no-one has sat down and planned everything out. I would have cheered because I would have thought it was ironic, because it was funny
And before I receive still more protestations of moral outrage, be clear that because of the body armor that Bonds (and yes, yes, Biggio) wears, no-one is at risk of losing life, limb or livelihood beacause somebody got plunked in their thighs or in their gut or wherever it was.
I think Caminitit is a poor citation, for reasons that I go into more deeply in a post I plan to write in reply to a poster less organized than yourself at the end of last night's game thread.
hmm
about Houston fans being "losers" for giving Russ an ovation as he left, i think that's casting a lot of people in an unfortunate light. we were down big. our team wasn't just getting beat, they were floundering in a most dumbfounding manner. as much as we all hated to admit it, the sole attention grabbing subplot in the game was what was gonna happen when Mr. 713 strolled to the plate, and for most of us that could give two shits about whether or not he laid claim to the most talked about 2nd place of all time, it annoyed the piss out of us. folks were taking every opportunity to voice their displeasure with their present state of trying to enjoy a baseball game. the sarcastic standing ovation for Willy's inning ending catch in the 4th was as loud or louder than that for Springer. as i heard somebody else say, people were just looking for something to do. he certainly was not the first pitcher to leave a game with an ovation after hitting an opposing player. i'm fine with it.
How can you think
by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on May 18, 2006 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions
That's not true.
Watching it again, the look on Springer's face doesn't really say much, but Munson's does. Munson's eyes were wide with shock. Since Munson had appeared to know what was going on with the first four pitches, it was obvious that Springer and Munson had talked before this AB. It was also obvious that Munson had no idea that Springer was going to hit Bonds. My guess is that Springer meant to crowd the plate and piss Bonds off and then eventually walk him, but he never meant to intentionally hit him. Hitting him was just icing on the cake, IMO.
The Astros have never been an aggressive team. They take their HBP's in silence, except for Morgan who is the King of Flop. But when the pitchers start taking liberties with the batter's bodies, it means something. Game 3 of the World Series -- no one out there will convince me Roy didn't throw that pitch at Crede by accident. He smirked on the mound after the deed was done.
The past two games were ugly and not in our favor. Our fans were becoming restless and our players just stopped caring. Our young pitchers looked completely lost. Something needed to be done because this media circus of the past few days was Bonds' fault. He created a somewhat of a war at MMP and the Astros needed to do something to try and win a battle. Last night's game was not one where Ausmus could play second and Pettitte could pinch-hit to make things all better.
Absolutely Not Bonds' Fault
I agree with much of the rest of what you say, but the loss of focus can only be the fault of the Astros players. Even Mike Gallo--who I'm beginning to realize did no-one any favors when he opened his mouth--would be hard pressed to make the claim that it was Barry Bonds who forced Willy T to botch two fly balls, or Barry Bonds who forced Everett to make that very uncharacteristic error, or caused any of the other ugliness that we've been forced to watch over the last two days.
And also, Mikey--Springer is smart enough to know that hitting Bonds is not gonna help his team.
Stark and a commenter have tried to make the case that because Bonds hit a homer off Springer in 2001 and hit him with a pitch in 2002, that means that he was throwing at him last night. I don't know but isn't it more likely--since we don't read about Springer's Tony Gwynn-like receptacle of personal matchup info--that Springer probably didn't even remember what had ahppened the last time he faced Bonds?
by rastronomicals on May 17, 2006 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions
See, I believe everything is tied together
IMO, they're so sick of Bonds that they're just going through the motions until they leave. Everytime a player is interviewed, it usually starts with them rolling their eyes.
If it took a hit from Springer to make them care a little bit, so be it. It isn't Bonds' fault directly, but it has to do with him. I'll be the first to admit I cheered when he got hit and I don't feel bad about it. I'm sick of watching "Bonds and 17 other guys who can kind of play baseball too." I want my Astros back.
that's unfortunate
by and large, we have some good intellectual analysis on this site. if you are put off for now by some things that have been said in what you'd probably be the first to agree is not the Astros most shining moment, i think it's a shame that you'd give us the outright blackball. i personally try not to do too much moral grandstanding, for fear that i may later be revealed as a hypocrit, but Peter Griffin once said, "... Come AWWWWN!"
hopefully you'll come back sometime when we're not being baited into a pissing contest over which professional ballplayer is more deplorable. usually we're pretty cool people.
I never said it was his fault
What I meant is that he is the source of the problem, whether he likes it or not, or whether it's fair to him or not. Because of that, he is going to catch any flack the Astros' pitchers have for the Giants.
And another thing
by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on May 18, 2006 1:12 AM CDT reply actions
Skerred?
by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on May 18, 2006 1:15 AM CDT reply actions
backup, nameless...
Surely you're rational enough to see the difference. HBPs are a part of the game. He hit his freakin' shoulder. Not his arm, not his hand. Not his head. I'm sure it hurt like hell, but that's not the point.
I don't like the location of the pitch, but what's done is done.
If Barry wasn't okay w/ being HBP, he wouldn't stand so close to the damn plate, he wouldn't wear the elbow guard.
by StrosDux on May 18, 2006 11:18 PM CDT reply actions
btw, I'm of the opinion...
Russ has never struck me as that type (I was quite surprised to be honest) to want to actually hurt a guy. Maybe he did, I don't know. I'd be surprised, though, if that were his intention.
Personally, however, I'm going to wait to hear Russ's side of the story before I go pronouncing my moral judgments. But that's just how I am.
by StrosDux on May 18, 2006 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions
If you're going to be demeaning to a regular...
Having said that, I personally didn't have a problem understanding what Saylinara was saying because I knew exactly what she meant.
Are you SERIOUSLY an Astros fan? Or at least a serious one? Because if you were you'd know this is NOT a team that is fond of interaction w/ the media, particularly not in that sort of environment. It's not directly Bonds' fault (except that he doesn't deal w/ it himself so it then becomes the responsibility of everyone else connected w/ the occasion), moreso indirectly.
Put bluntly, they get snippy and such when that sort of incessant question is asked reguarding guys that they love and whom are their teammates (Bags, Roger), forget someone they personally do not like (and, from what I've gleaned, most of the them don't like Barry's attitude). I'm not shocked by the result (especially considering the experience level of the starting pitchers involved).
Russ is one of the veterans on this club. I have no doubt he did it on purpose. Beyond that, I can't vouch for anything. I'm not trying to make excuses, you just need to understand the reality of the way the 'Stros are.
by StrosDux on May 18, 2006 11:38 PM CDT reply actions
David...
I'm going to take exception to the name-calling and exception to the fact that you think you know what I meant by those comments, that you assumed you knew what "side" I was on and then blasted me when I was unable to respond (I'm making a wild guess that either someone told you about my comment and you came here to respond OR that you read that specific comment when hunting for stuff to throw in our faces).
That's pretty chickenshit, if you ask me. Sounds to me like you guys were spoiling for a fight.
Translation on my comments: Skerred=pitching/playing scared. Y'know, like leaving slop over the plate to be hit into the stands. Like the team has some fight in it. Is this really an objectionable concept.
Secondly, if you're seriously trying to tell me that he can only be HBP on that enormous arm guard, you need to reexamine whatever you think your boy's entitled to. I never personally thought he was in any danger of being hurt (maybe he was and I misperceived, been known to happen before), nor did I think Russ threw at him intentionally w/ the purpose of hurting him.
Did I think it was intentional? Yes. Do I have a problem w/ that? Honestly? Not really.
I don't have specific issues w/ Barry Bonds, to be honest. I really couldn't possibly care less about the man. He's not important to me, but I don't hate him. I call him barroid to be silly. I do, however, hate his showboating. For the record, I don't particularly like it when my boys do it either, but they don't really do it particularly often.
But if you want to think I'm a cretin, be my guest. Just quit acting like you aren't intending to make some sort of moral judgment when you've just done so.
And, uh, the original post was flamebait.
BTW, maybe we didn't ascribe any sort of malicious intent to the event (and I certainly didn't mean any w/ my post) because that's generally not the way the 'Stros (or Russ Springer whilest he's been w/ us) have done things.
by StrosDux on May 19, 2006 12:24 AM CDT reply actions
Disgrace
And make no mistake - it WAS in purpose. I've watched Russ Springer pitch since he attended my alma mater, LSU, and even caught some of his minor league games, before watching his MLB career, and I can count on both hands the amount of times he;s missed a target by 2 feet. He did it 5 TIMES IN A ROW to Bonds - each time missing toward the batter. I can believe 1 got away, maybe even two, but 5? Gimme a break! If he didn't have any better control than that, he'd have never gotten to AA ball!
And to see the fans cheer that made me sick. And to hear my fellow Stros fans deny the obvious, and make excuses is worse! Don't lower yourself to that liar Bonds' level! And is you still don't believe it was intentional somehow, watch yesterday's Baseball Tonight - Gammons talked to Springer's teammates in Arizona from when Bonds hit a homer against him a few years back. They told Gammons that Springer always talked about how much he hated Bonds, and how pissed off he was when he let him hit one out. Why would they say that if it wasn't true? I hate Bonds too, but i wouldn't lower myself to hurt him physically. It demeans yourself. It disrespects the game of baseball. It tarnishes a proud Astros tradition in front of the whole country! Why? He's not worth it!
by Diggity on May 19, 2006 4:41 AM CDT reply actions
Look...
Do I have a problem w/ "purpose pitches" as Mike Gallo called it? Not really.
BTW, do you seriously think your boy didn't show up ours when he almost hit that homer? That strut is assinine and incredibly disrespectful. It always has been. Just because it doesn't offend most teams doesn't mean that it won't offend others.
The 'Stros don't appreciate being showed up because they don't really do it. BTW, I definitely agree about the basis for plunkings like that. That you do it in response to something: a plunking of a fellow teammate or the other team showing your team up.
As far as the crowd goes, well, I can't vouch for that. We have some pretty vicious crowds nowadays in situations like that (think the Carlos Beltran crowds last summer, people booing Jeff Kent a few weeks ago). Generally I think our crowds are nice, but there are always exceptions to the rule. That crowd last Tuesday would be one of them.
If I had to explain (not necessarily excuse) the crowd's motivations I'd probably say they were happy to see him "put in his place". I don't think anybody wanted him hurt, our fans aren't generally like that. And if they were, then I have an issue w/ that.
I just think it's unfair to psychoanalyze a group of 32000 people as if you KNOW why they've done something. Because they may just have 32000 motivations.
I wouldn't doubt some of those people would love to see a guy injured. Some peeps are just that way. I would like to think the majority aren't, that Russ Springer's not.
And I most certainly am not.
I'm not flying blind w/ Russ/the 'Stros/myself when I say this: while I think Russ DID do it on purpose, I do NOT think it was w/ the intention to hurt. I think it was as a leader on the pitching staff trying to say "don't be scared to throw in on this guy"
I could very well be wrong, and if I am then I apologize. I just have a hard time believing based on years of experience as a fan of this team that that's the case. Russ has never struck me as vindictive, the 'Stros aren't generally very aggressive in that respect in spite of being hit a lot and I'm not a fan of HBP because of all the injuries our players have sustained (Bags' hand thrice broken, lil E's broken arm two years ago and bruised hand earlier this season, Mo's deeply bruised hand that basically made his season toast w/ essentially two months to go (including the playoffs) at the beginning of September last year.
I said I would've preferred if they hit him on the tush or something a little less likely to be injured. But he wasn't injured so I'm not going to go all morally outraged.
For the record, I've personally had injuries by people being stubborn/vindictive in a sporting event and my brother was seriously injured in one.
Believe me when I say I know that stupidity like that is no joking matter.
by StrosDux on May 19, 2006 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions
I thought people in SF
I hate Bonds. I went to the first game and booed evrytime he was at bat or near the ball at all. If I would have been at the second game I would have cheered Springer. You wouldn't be able to tell if he was hit in the butt or the head. I think people that think Springer was trying to kill or mame Bonds are being unreasonable. I also believe that if Bonds would have been injured most baseball fans,players,owners, and management would have thought it was good. Almost everyone thinks Bonds is a cheat/liar.
For any SF fan there is a term for your thinking. It goes, He may be an A-hole, but he is our A-hole. Face it, most people dislike Barry. And they really should. I will love the day when Barry goes to jail; and he will.
Wow
You're the one on the bad trip if you go to games to see a hall of famer get hit on purpose.
by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on May 24, 2006 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Look...
Yes, even if they are our own.
As far as steroids and Cammy go (as I've seen here and elsewhere, nobody was rooting Cammy along when they found out about that. He was retired at that point.
Now, he's not only not playing, he's freakin' dead.
Barry can defend himself (even though he's admitted jack), Cammy can't.
If you have 'Stros fans irritated w/ you for bringing up the subject, maybe that's why. Y'know, the whole 'don't speak ill of the dead' thing.
That's not to say we either knew about it when he was playing or support that usage now. I don't remember any 'Stros fan saying that.
I know when I think of Cammy I think of disappointment. A lot of whatifs.
by StrosDux on Jun 1, 2006 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions
webcams
by mathew234 on Oct 4, 2006 9:10 AM CDT reply actions
webcams
by mathew234 on Oct 4, 2006 9:11 AM CDT reply actions
invest
by mathew234 on Oct 21, 2006 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions

by boatshoes @ The Crawfish Boxes on 























