The TCB Daily Boil: Springtime for Robbie Grossman

Rob Foldy

Edward S. Garza looks at what we might draw from Robbie Grossman's strong spring training.

Over at the newly redesigned FiveThirtyEight, Neil Paine has written a great article, "When Spring Training Matters," considering preseason statistics for hitters. In it he weighs whether we can reasonably predict a player's regular-season performance based on his success (or failure) during February and March. Paine looks at, for example, Marlon Byrd's unexpected performance last spring, wherein he slashed .357/.393/.571 before proceeding to have his best season ever. In the end, he examines how writer Tom Tango's Marcel projections might help us root regular-season predictions in a player's spring training stats. His conclusion?

[S]pring productivity is statistically significant when predicting actual performance in the upcoming season, even after controlling for a player’s Marcel projection. However, while significant, the effect is extremely small: To raise his expected regular-season wOBA [weighted on-base average, a measure of a hitter's overall offensive value] by just a single point, a typical player would need to hit for a wOBA roughly 17 points higher than expected during the spring.

In other words, spring numbers can and should affect our predictions for a player’s regular-season production, but only slightly, and only after a particularly strong or weak performance.

Paine is at best cautiously optimistic about preseason stats, but he still lauds the showings of Detroit's Nick Castellanos and St. Louis's Kolten Wong, using Tango's model to predict a solid 2014 for each of them.

While cautious, Paine's findings should comfort Astros fans eager to see how Robbie Grossman will perform this year--not to mention a front office that's trying to extend his contract. Here are the 24-year-old's stats from last season followed by his spring numbers this year:

Season Plate Appearances Batting Average On-Base % Slugging % Walks Strikeouts
2013 288 .268 .332 .370 23 70
2014 (ST) 50 .378 .400 .556 3 10

Yes, the latter is a small sample size, and, yes, Grossman will probably fail to post a .400 OBP this season. But if these numbers don't represent a "particularly strong" performance, then what does? Indeed, Grossman is affirming his ceiling as a valuable major-league starter. Given their recent talks with him, Luhnow & Co. seem to agree.*

What do you make of Grossman's excellent spring, as well as the front office's attempt to extend his contract? Let us know below.

(All stats are courtesy of


*On a related note, if you can find Grossman's line-drive percentage from this spring, please share it in the comment section. It'd be interesting to see how it compares with his percentage from last season (25%).

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join The Crawfish Boxes

You must be a member of The Crawfish Boxes to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Crawfish Boxes. You should read them.

Join The Crawfish Boxes

You must be a member of The Crawfish Boxes to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Crawfish Boxes. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.