Bagwell with 56% of the vote; denied HOF again
Barry Larkin gets into HOF on third try. Not a big surprise; it didn't appear that Bags had the votes this time around. But his vote percentage increased over the prior year----there's that.
5 months ago
clack
41 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Chris Elsberry of Connecticut post voted Juan Gonzlez over Bagwell
Not voted both, left Bagwell off his ballot for Gonzalez….
Let that sink in what kind of writers there are.
Met fan here
Thought you might appreciate that other fans are as gobsmacked by Bagwell’s snub (again) as Astros fans must be. I know it’s all about steroids, but if we’re going to play guilty until proven innocent, then Ken Griffey Jr. and Derek Jeter better never sniff the hall, as they played in the same era as Bagwell.
It’s amazing how dumb some sportswriters continue to be. To borrow an idea from Bob Dylan, it’s a wonder these guys didn’t die from forgetting how to breathe.
Mark Cuban for owner! Save us from the Wilpons!
by Greenpoint Ian on Jan 9, 2012 3:09 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
What a crock...
At least… I remember reading in some article posted on here Sunday, that players who reach 50% of the vote tend to make it in the hall eventually because popular opinion is in their favor and the other voters begin to fall into line.
Gil Hodges
Yeah, they said that during MLBN’s HOF Election Announcement show.
Buster Olney had the balls to put his head over the parapet
The Baseball Writers’ vote should reflect history. Not whitewash it.
Jayson Stark makes some excellent points here:
What we have here is a guy who has vehemently denied he used any illegal PED, and who didn’t appear in the Mitchell report even though star witness Kirk Radomski worked for the Astros. What we also have here is a player whose Hall of Fame qualifications couldn’t possibly be more clear-cut. How many first basemen are in the 400-homer, 200-steal club? Just one: Jeff Bagwell. How many first basemen have ever ripped off at least 12 straight seasons with an OPS-plus of 130 or better? Only two: Bagwell and Gehrig. Not to mention this fellow was a rookie of the year, an MVP, a Gold Glove winner and the Simba-esque leader on a team that went to the postseason six times. So why are so many people NOT voting for him again?
by AstroB on Jan 9, 2012 3:16 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
As much as the bullshit steroids stuff grabs attention,
I think most of the problem is just that Bagwell’s greatness isn’t really appreciated by most. Anyone looking at more advanced statistics knows that Bagwell is an obvious hall-of-famer, possibly the greatest first baseman between Nellie Fox and Pujols, but his greatness is obscured because (1) He did a lot of things really well instead of one or two things superbly well, (2) his early stats were depressed from the dome, and (3) he didn’t have an especially long career.
Bill James has written about this kind of thing plenty of times. The Hall voters decide who gets in based off of conventional counting stats, and Bagwell’s conventional stats are hall-worthy but not really eye-popping.
Bagwell will eventually get in. If not next year, then probably the year after that. It’s frustrating because most of us understand how great of a ballplayer he really was and meanwhile his name gets dragged through the mud because people want to make up rumors about him, but it will eventually happen.
No big surprise Bags didn't get elected.
HOF voters really have no sort of precedent for a player like Bagwell (a guy who’s been suspected, but never directly linked to steroids), so I think there’s a lot of confusion about what to do. Some writers think he’s hall worthy until proven guilty, some are on the fence, and some think he’s guilty by association.
Of course, the slam dunk “no” group like Palmeiro and McGwire is still relatively small, so think it’ll be interesting to see what happens when guys like Mike Piazza and Frank Thomas get on the ballots themselves.
Eventually, I think most (if not all—including Bagwell) of the HR guys will get elected, but the timeline for doing so is really anyone’s guess.
Well
Some of the ESPN guys doing a live chat said that Piazza and Thomas stand a good chance at first ballot, but Biggio will have to wait a few years. Not based on thier votes, but based on how the writters as a whole vote.
Harold Reynolds...
…said the same thing about Biggio not getting in on the first ballot. He was basing that on Alomar not getting in on the first ballot. He didn’t mention Thomas because they were talking about the 2013 class, but he said he thought Piazza would get in on the first ballot.
Reynolds also said that although he personally thinks Bonds and Clemens deserve to get in based on their pre-steroids careers, he doesn’t think the writers will ever vote them in.
Regardless of steroid suspicion, it’s hard to keep Piazza out of the Hall of Fame. He is not Johnny Bench from the throwing perspective, but he is the most prolific offensive catcher in history.
I don’t understand how Thomas can get in to the Hall of Fame if Bagwell isn’t inducted. Thomas and Bagwell were similar offensive players, but Bags was a much better defender and base runner. Thomas had greater longevity because the DH saved him. Thomas and Bagwell were born on the same day, by the way.
This just leaves the door open for Bags and Biggio to go in together.
This station is non-operational
IT'S TEBOW TIME!
On the twitterverse
This percentage is almost exactly what people were predicting.
Looks like Bagwell is on track to go in with Biggio. Frustrating as statistically, and going by character/intangibles if you want to go there, he should be a surefire first ballot hall of famer. But, at least it looks pretty certain that he will make it into the Hall.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
I know this is way off topic
And I’m sure that Bags will get into the HOF at some point, so I’m not really worried…but for fun I just looked up the 2012 mock draft.
I know that its all pure guesstimation, but I was excited to see that neither Williams’ were in the 1st round. There are a lot of intriguing names listed but two of the top names flying around here, two of the more exciting position players we’ve discussed, weren’t named. Is there a chance we could land Mark Appel and a Nick/Trey Williams? That would be SWEET!!!!
by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 9, 2012 6:29 PM CST via mobile reply actions
It depends on whether they would sign for second round money. They both have commitments to colleges, with Nick Williams committed to Texas. The CBA likely will limit the Astros’ ability to pay much over slot.
Im still mixed up on the rules
Are we not able to go over slot or can we go over as long as we stay in the required budget for the top 10 rounds? I guess I’m going to have to see us go through the draft before I fully understand it. But being a local-ish kid, I can’t see him not wanting to sign as the top pick in the second round or sandwhich round or whatever…
by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 9, 2012 7:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
each slot will have its own recommended amount of money. You can go over for that slot but there’s a hefty tax if you do.
Follow my ramblings on Twitter .
by Timothy De Block on Jan 9, 2012 8:00 PM CST up reply actions
Dam/Thanks
What’s the deal with the top 10 round pool? That’s what is confusing me I guess
by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 9, 2012 8:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
If you sign a player below slot, you can move the unspent money to another slot position. (But you can’t move money if a player is not signed.)
What?!
I guess that makes some sense. Teams can’t pick two or three good players with the intent of signing them for above slot and not signing two or three other players, thus defeating the whole purpose of it. But if your team is actually struggling to sign prospects, you can’t benefit from not being able to sign one by spending that money on another prospect. I don’t like it, but I wouldn’t know how to fix it…
by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 9, 2012 9:31 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
We have one supplemental round pick, yes?
One of the two could fall to there, most likely Nick Williams. I would be shocked if Trey made it out of the first round barring crazy bonus demands.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
Also, is the new CBA in effect for this year's draft?
I was under the impression it didn’t take effect until 2013.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
Im pretty sure it takes effect this year
But I do remember hearing something about it not going into “full” effect until 13…?
by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 9, 2012 8:34 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Not draft talk or Bagwell talk,
And the move hit earlier this afternoon, but the Astros should put in a claim on Fernando Martinez from the Mets. It would require a corresponding roster move, and the Astros already have plenty of outfield depth, but the guy is still pretty young, and still has one option left from what I read. Here’s the link:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/01/martinez-herrera-on-waivers.html
by conroestro on Jan 9, 2012 11:16 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
It’s also worth noting that some Mets’ fans were also upset that Daniel Herrera was put on waivers. Herrera is a tough LOOGY who throws sidearm and features a screwball. Herrera could choose to become a free agent if he isn’t claimed off waivers.
I’m surprised that both of these guys were removed from the roster. I didn’t think the Mets were that stacked in there system.
We also took Rhiner from them.
by conroestro on Jan 10, 2012 7:53 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
At least Bags' percentage went up...
I just read Verducci’s article on SI (with my temperture rising) and he spent 3/4’ers of the section on Bagwell talking about steriods on and on…I don’t get it…I get that he is supicious but he went way over the top I think.
Bagwell and Biggio have to get in…
As always, go Stros!
Biggio and Bagwell for the HOF!
While you’re getting the dander up….this guy turned in a blank ballot, and says that he will have to do research to determine whether Biggio is worthy of a vote.
Yes on Schilling and Piazza, but he's wavering about Biggio?
That’s really sad.
... because 668 doubles is debatable (most ever by a pure right-handed hitter, if I'm not mistaken).
And being one of 28 (JUST 28!) players in the history of the freaking game to get 3,000 hits. Anybody that needs to debate whether Biggio belongs probably doesn’t deserve to breathe the same oxygen the rest of us do.
























