Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

"Astros owner Jim Crane announced that the team will not be changing its name. "The Houston Astros are here to stay," he said."

4 months ago Tiny CRPerry13 59 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great news.

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Jan 31, 2012 12:17 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

whether intended or not, this turned into a positive PR move. The Astros got a bunch of national publicity for a day. And Crane can now say that “the fans have spoken” and the Astros will follow their fans’ input.

by clack on Jan 31, 2012 12:41 PM CST reply actions  

intended

Crane is a business man. He knew what he was doing.

by lawson3 on Jan 31, 2012 1:48 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I don’t think it was on purpose. It blew every bit of goodwill that the new fan friendly changes would have brought.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

what good will did it blow?

That he reached out to get fans opinions? That he got people talking about the astros? Come on the guys a billionaire business man. He reminded people why the astros and the astros name is important. People were writing stories about the importance of the astros name to the city. I don’t see how you can think that’s bad.

by lawson3 on Jan 31, 2012 3:11 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

There was some really good stuff that was implemented and it got completely ignored. You’re probably right, from the business side it got the Astros a pop. I hated having to hear everybody freak out about it. I hate negative attention like that too, and it gave every jackass another opportunity to make a snide comment.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Are you calling me a jackass?

Because I wrote an entire snide article about it. </3

by CRPerry13 on Jan 31, 2012 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Not you jackasses here. I meant national guys, and non astro fans. I don’t mind if it’s in the family.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I still would have loved the Houston Honeybadgers, haha

by CRPerry13 on Jan 31, 2012 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Flavor of the week. Ha.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 3:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Think Toronto Raptors.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

you say "everybody freak out"

I say the it was the common astros fan being passionate about the astros for the first time in a long time. It was a good move.

by lawson3 on Jan 31, 2012 3:37 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Boo

I was a big fan of changing the name. You changed the product, might as well change the name.

by Bobbythegreat on Jan 31, 2012 2:20 PM CST reply actions  

The anger that came with a name change paled in comparison to my anger of the league change. The thing is though, every nickname that’s suggested, in jest or seriously, is just so horrible. I’m sure Astros would sound ridiculous if it were suggested now, but at least everyone is used to it. Plus, it’s kind of humiliating on a national level, and the last thing we need is for one more thing to get made fun of.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

As far as I am concerned as a former lifelong Astro fan

I think if they were called the Houston Tampons they would look less ridiculous than they will when they are playing gimmickball at 9 o clock at night in Seattle. Since the league blackmailed them into the gimmick league, they should cut all ties to when they were a real baseball team so we can remember them separate from the bullshit that they are now.

by Bobbythegreat on Jan 31, 2012 10:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I can totally understand that point of view, as I think that was pretty much my initial reaction.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I am a fan of baseball, I always have been.

My team has always been the Astros, but when the Astros were blackmailed into not playing baseball anymore, I stopped being a fan. It’s pretty simple. I would be an Astros fan again if something changed and they were still going to be playing baseball after this year. That’s why I want a name change, so I can say I was always a fan of the Astros without having to say that I am a fan of the new gimmickball team that will be in Houston.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 1, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Wait, so you’re a fan of baseball. Yet baseball was the one that blackmailed the Astros into moving. So you became a fan of the organization that made the move you’re upset with.

Follow my ramblings on Twitter .

by Timothy De Block on Feb 2, 2012 10:10 AM CST up reply actions  

You misunderstand completely

I am a fan of the sport of baseball. The sport of baseball didn’t blackmail the Astros, the MLB did. I hope that cleared things up.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 2, 2012 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh my mistake, the Sugar Land Skeeters are here -—→ http://www.sugarlandskeeters.com/index.cfm

Follow my ramblings on Twitter .

by Timothy De Block on Feb 2, 2012 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I'll likely support the Skeeters more

going forward than the Astros. If I am going to support a team with bush league rules, it might as well be an actual bush league team.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 2, 2012 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry if that came off as prickish.

But why penalize the Astros by revoking one’s fandom when it wasn’t the team’s decision to switch leagues? That’s on Selig.

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

i agree

As a true lifelong fan I can say as long as the astros are in existence I will be a fan. Even if I don’t agree with the league pushing them around. I have no interest in starting over with a new team.

by lawson3 on Feb 1, 2012 10:17 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I'll be an Astros fan for life, as well...

…unless Buds Selig and Adams team up and move the team to Tennessee. That would be the end of the line.

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 11:44 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I will be a fan as long as the Astros

are playing baseball, but I have to admit that their decision to stop playing baseball after this season has made me stop caring as much already in preparation me to tune it out completely the season after this one. It was sort of like once Bud Adams announced that the Oilers were moving, I was always an Oiler fan, but I stopped caring then in preparation for them to be gone.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 1, 2012 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I stopped reading after you said "thier decision"

Since its been well documented that they had no choice… But I’m sure the rest was really good.

by lawson3 on Feb 1, 2012 1:37 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

It was "their decision"

Crane could have called the MLB’s bluff, he had by far the best bid for the team, they wouldn’t have thrown that money away.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 2, 2012 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

I think its been pretty well documented that whoever bought the team was going to be forced to relocate the Astros to the AL.

by conroestro on Feb 2, 2012 10:31 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

That was certainly what the MLB wanted

however, I believe that they should have called their bluff and refused to buy if they didn’t back down. The MLB wouldn’t have wanted to devalue their product, they would have relented.

by Bobbythegreat on Feb 2, 2012 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Doubt it.

by conroestro on Feb 2, 2012 4:32 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Sorry Stupendous Man

I tried to rec your post but i think it flagged it instead.

by Uncle Chris on Feb 1, 2012 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Ha…no problem. Seems like that happens a lot when rec’ing comments on SB Nation blogs.

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 11:41 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

i want to complain about people complaining about people that complain. (grin)

by mikrobass3 on Feb 1, 2012 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

I’m a dude playing a dude disguised as another dude…

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 11:41 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Amen

Venting after it happened is one thing, but when you keep harping on this long it’s just annoying. If you’re not a fan anymore then maybe a website for Astros fans isn’t the best place to hang out.

http://www.crawfishboxes.com

by OremLK on Feb 2, 2012 12:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Second that.

by conroestro on Feb 2, 2012 10:32 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree with you.

by clack on Feb 1, 2012 2:20 AM CST up reply actions  

it’s not like ‘astros’ is a great name by any stretch. not only has it lost its relevance, it also rhymes with lastros, disastros and a$$holes (assonance). we’re just used to it.

by mikrobass3 on Feb 1, 2012 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it's a great name.

It’s “outdated” only in the sense that it evokes the ‘60s. But names like the Red Sox/White Sox/Reds evoke 19th/Early 20th Century baseball. And that’s fine, because that’s when those teams were first formed.

But the Astros were a product of the ‘60s — modernism, hope for the future, space-age stuff. I like that. That’s when Houston started to change into the city it is today. Does it refer to something (NASA) that isn’t as big of a deal now? Yeah, I guess, but I don’t see how that matters.

And I like being able to call them the lastros and disastros.

by Only_A_Lad on Feb 1, 2012 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

So what about the uniforms?

Is it possible that could be changed?

by LordGav1n on Jan 31, 2012 10:55 PM CST reply actions  

I’m positive they will have new unis in 2013.

by MadMartygan on Jan 31, 2012 11:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Definitely not this off season, we couldn’t possibly live up to the new miami marlins uniforms. They’ve set the bar so high it would be impossible to compete with that in the same offseason.

by lawson3 on Feb 1, 2012 7:20 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yep.

I’d put the odds of the Astros wearing new uniforms in 2013 at 100%.

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 9:46 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Might be longer.

Usually takes about two years to design and produce new uniforms (remember, you’re not just changing up the uniforms — you’re changing the logos, signage, everything). But if they start now it might be done in time for the 2013 season.

I’d say 2014 is a little more likely, however.

by Only_A_Lad on Feb 1, 2012 11:35 AM CST up reply actions  

They had new uniforms ready by opening day 2000 with the move to Enron Field, which leads me to have faith that they could get it done in time. I don’t know when they started designing the current uniforms, though…

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Feb 1, 2012 11:47 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I don’t see why that should take such a long time to do. I could conjure up a new logo in a single night using my personal software. The Astros have more than a year to have this done.

Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason why so few engage in it. - Henry Ford

by BustaPozee on Feb 1, 2012 6:37 PM CST up reply actions  

As I recall, the Astros said that they had to get a uniform change finalized by the end of the 2012 season in order to get it approved by the league before the 2013 season. Although the Astros haven’t committed to making a uniform change, it certainly sounded like they are targeting 2013.

by clack on Feb 1, 2012 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

In our latest podcast April 6th was a date mentioned that the Astros would have to have any changes in by.

Follow my ramblings on Twitter .

by Timothy De Block on Feb 2, 2012 10:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Is that the date for uniform changes? That’s pretty soon.

by clack on Feb 2, 2012 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m not sure we were specifically talking about the name change, but it sounded like anything.

Follow my ramblings on Twitter .

by Timothy De Block on Feb 2, 2012 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I imagine if they’re going to make a change they need to at least make the decision soon, so they can start designing them and go through any process MLB might have.

Follow my ramblings on Twitter .

by Timothy De Block on Feb 2, 2012 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chimp_small
The Importance of George Springer

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oswalt in 2012
Small
Heck and Co. - Your time is up.
Small
Santana and a bold new top 10, etc..
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Lance Berkman with possible torn ACL...
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Quasi update on Lucas Giolito for draft
100_1519_small
Good News
Small
Thinking about where the top 2012 draftees will be ranked for 2013
Astros_small
Most valuable building blocks
Nsapcs13_large_small
Minor League Open Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

TCB Tweets!

    

Current Series

4 game series vs Rockies @ Coors Field

Houston Astros
@ Colorado Rockies

Monday, May 28, 2012, 2:10 PM CDT
Coors Field

Wandy Rodriguez vs Juan Nicasio

Sunny. Winds blowing in from center field at 5-10 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 70.

Complete Coverage >

Mon 05/28 7:10 PM CDT
Wed 05/30 7:40 PM CDT
Thu 05/31 7:40 PM CDT

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Cincinnati 27 20 .574 0 Won 2
St. Louis 26 22 .541 1.5 Won 1
Pittsburgh 23 24 .489 4 Won 3
Houston 22 25 .468 5 Lost 2
Milwaukee 19 28 .404 8 Lost 2
Chicago 15 32 .319 12 Lost 12

(updated 5.28.2012 at 12:18 AM CDT)

Yahoo_full_count

Managing Editors

Tcb_icon_small Timothy De Block

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

H_astros_small Subber10

Astrobritrs2_small AstroB

Small conroestro

Small CRPerry13