Random Houston Astros Thoughts From The Last Few Days
I'm sorry, TCB. I've been terribly neglectful of you over the past week. High school football season has just been eating my lunch lately. I'm hoping a slowdown in my schedule this week will mean I get to catch back up and get on course, so bear with me.
Since I didn't get to post on some of the stories that broke lately, I thought I'd roll some quick thoughts on it all into one post. Feel free to discuss...
1) Jim Crane fires back at MLB - I mentioned this on the podcast (which will be released later in the week), but I find it terribly fascinating that Jim Crane has decided to fire back through the media at MLB. This approval process has gotten ugly in the past few months, as allegations have surfaced about all sorts of transgressions from the future owner of the Astros.
He's right to be upset by this, because part of these stories are getting out because of leaks on MLB's side. Maybe not the commissioner's office directly, but people on his side of the court. If Selig really didn't want this getting out, he'd put a clamp on it.
So, Crane started negotiating through the media and responded to the AL realignment talk by saying the sale has a deadline of November 30. I've been beating the drum for this, but just to reiterate, that deadline is approaching faster and faster because baseball will not make any major announcements during the postseason. That wipes the entire month of October off the map and means the earliest owners could meet about this would be early November.
The November deadline also means Crane won't be put off until the Winter Meetings for a move to be made. Could be significant, but probably won't be. As much as I wonder if this process will go through, I think greed will carry the day. Crane paying $680 million for the Astros will increase everyone's franchise values, so it's in every owners interest to bring him on board.
I'll get to a couple more things after the jump...
2) Astros fire two scouts - Color me shocked that Houston let Rusty Pendergast go. He was a holdover from the last scouting administration, so I'm not completely surprised, but he has been productive lately, finding Ruben Alaniz most recently.
Pendergast had a good run on finding quality players this decade and did it in a very big state. I'm sure Houston has other Texas scouts lined up and ready to go, but can't you see Nolan Ryan swooping in very quickly to pick up Rusty?
As for the other scout, Lincoln Martin, was this a case of the Astros and Bobby Heck realizing they reached on Jay Austin, Telvin Nash and DDJ? Martin was most directly responsible for those moves and now he's looking for work. Look at where those guys were drafted and then let's talk about how Martin had to have Heck's ear to get those guys taken there. At the same time, a regional cross checker and a national cross checker had to see them too and still sign off on the picks.
The fact that all three of those high draft picks have struggled to a degree needed to be recognized and I think the reshuffling you're seeing in the scouting system means Houston knows it's had problems with parts of the draft. Talk up Jio Mier all you want and the rest of Houston's drafts in the past few years, but how many of those players have been unquestioned successes? Austin Wates and Jordan Lyles? I guess you can put Dallas Keuchel there and obviously J.D. Martinez and J.B. Shuck. Still, Houston has some evaluation problems that need to get sorted out and I think this is a first step in that direction.
3) Roy and Hunter return to town - This is going to be weird. Two of the most recent Astros icons are back and playing for a different team. I know there won't be that many people on hand to see them, but it won't be the same seeing them suit up for the Phillies.
I still don't feel upset at Oswalt for asking out and I don't dislike Pence because he's playing on a different team. I can't even muster up dislike for Berkman, even though he's playing for the Cardinals. I'm glad they're playing for a good team that's heading to the playoffs, but I also don't think I'm going to find myself rooting for the Phillies in the postseason just because of them.
It's a complicated world the Astros are in now. They finally committed to the rebuilding effort, so I'm not going to be angry that they had to trade away some good players. It's still going to be slightly weird.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I can’t believe that the Astros are even being talked about in the realignment discussion. A change to the AL really would drastically change what Crane has agreed to buy. That 680 million is real money. I can’t believe Selig would put the sale of a franchise in Jeopardy over a stupid day dream he has been having. Crane and McClane should be highly upset. Hopefully Crane will continue to use media to his advantage. McClane should also voice his displeasure over how MLB has jacked around with this whole deal.
by Brad E on Sep 12, 2011 12:15 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Curious?
What’s a good resource to find out which scouts “signed” which players?
Baseball America is the best spot, as they list the scout for each player in the top 30.
I’m a simple man. I like pretty, dark-haired women and breakfast foods.
--Ron F'ing Swanson
by David Coleman on Sep 12, 2011 1:51 PM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Delino DeShields was a bad first round pick
and many of us said so at the time. His interview just before or after the draft indicated he’d take what the Astros handed to him but don’t expect any hard effort from him. That attitude could change of course, but I would not waste a first round choice on hoping it would .
Astros fan for life
by Joe in Birmingham on Sep 12, 2011 4:03 PM CDT reply actions
I still like the DDJ first round pick. Nobody can credibly say it's a bad pick at this stage....
Joe, there is no indication that DDJr. isn’t giving a hard effort. Everything I read about his effort is completely the opposite. In fact, the director of the Astros’ minor league system said he has been very pleased with him. Among other things, DDJ had to spend most of this season learning how to play a position that he has never played before, and after some rough beginnings, as one would expect, the Astros’ think he has adjusted well to fielding second base. It’s also hard to judge his offense at his current age, where he is young for his league.
by clack on Sep 12, 2011 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree. I saw him play a series in Rome, and he handled himself like a pro. I was impressed with his defense and his demeanor. I liked the pick at the time and I still think he will work out.
by Brad E on Sep 12, 2011 4:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I never loved it from an amateur prospect analysis/scouting perspective
I don’t know if I would go so far as to say it was a bad pick, but I certainly wouldn’t call it a great one. Of course, I was on the Josh Sale bandwagon and he’s had a horrible start to his career, so right now that’s not looking good either.
That said, I also would’ve taken Michael Choice over DeShields in a heartbeat, and he’s easily established himself as the best prospect of the three.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
Astros County has called things down the middle during the Crane saga
Barely a peep from the Chronicle on some of these allegations….
Its been left to Maury Brown as the only one reporting on some of the question marks over Crane. Here’s AC’s summation of the entire situation.
You mean Maury Brown patting himself on the back in every Jim Crane article?
Follow my ramblings on Twitter .
by Timothy De Block on Sep 12, 2011 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions
From the beginning when these allegations about Crane started trickling out, my opinion has been that Crane needed to publicly address them. (Assuming the allegations aren’t true, that’s what I wanted him to say: “they aren’t true.”) But Crane’s strategy instead seemed to be stay quiet and dismiss the allegations as unworthy of comment. According to Richard Justice, Crane recently hired a public relations person who apparently advised him to address the issues, resulting in the Chronicle interview. This may well be too late, and I can’t say that the interview thoroughly addressed the range of negative allegations (for one, I would like to hear him deny that he made the statements alleged in the EEOC complaint). But I think it’s a good idea for him to publicly defend himself.
Richard Justice writes that Crane’s interview will make Selig mad and hurt his chances more. As I read Justice’s column, it’s Crane’s attribution of the delay to the league realignment issue which would anger Selig. I’m not sure what to make of this part of the controversy. Is it possible that Crane is blaming the delay on his refusal to move the Astros to the AL because he wants to distract us from the other allegations? Even before Crane’s interview, there seemed to be two distinct and opposite “sources” in the articles: those who said that the sale is being held up in order to pressure the Astros into changing leagues, and those who said that the league realignment issue had nothing to do the sale approval process. The latter articles predicted that Crane would claim that changing leagues is holding up the sale in order to garner sympathy. Justice seems to hold the view that the AL realignment isn’t the big holdup, and Crane is trying to divert attention from the negative allegations. I don’t really know who is right here. In the vein of “where there’s smoke, there probably is fire,” I suspect that MLB is trying to apply some pressure to get Crane to agree to moving the Astros to the AL.
Richard Justice has a very high BS factor, and his column ripping Crane has a lot of BS. However, if there is one thing from Justice that is probably truthful, it is his close relationship with Bud Selig. So, I tend to believe him when he says that he knows how Selig will react to Crane’s interview. And that could be bad news for Crane’s deal.
by clack on Sep 12, 2011 7:31 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs

by 

























