Brett Wallace's First Half In Review: Has his confidence been damaged?
For baseball fans, the beginning of a fresh season is supposed to bring the excitement of a blank slate. October is so far away that fans can afford to be optimistic, if often somewhat cautiously. Given the length of the season and the year-to-year volatility of many players, expectations can fluctuate wildly based on spring training success and organizational votes of confidence. To put it lightly, the Houston Astros did not enter the season with high expectations after almost-fully committing to rebuilding by trading away franchise icons Lance Berkman and Roy Oswalt. The roster was filled with inexperienced and mediocre-to-bad players. Despite last year’s excellent second half and Ed Wade’s best attempts to beef up the middle infield, expectations for the 2011 Astros did not fluctuate wildly. If they differed at all, the discussions most likely gravitated around just how bad they would be.
And so the 2011 season began. Rebuilding teams like this one are usually not fun to watch, often requiring a relatively rare level of dedicated fandom. To make a bad situation worse, the farm system had been neglected for so long that the MLB team displayed a dearth of young talent, something Jason Castro’s year ending injury did nothing to remedy. As fans, much of our hope for the future rode on the shoulders of players like Castro, Chris Johnson, and Brett Wallace. With Johnson struggling mightily through the beginning of the season, Wallace alone bore the burden of providing a glitter of hope for the future of the Astros.
After a hot spring training, Wallace delivered in April to the tune of a .388/.458/.529 batting line. But in early May Wallace began to stumble, breaking his lucky bat and entering a relative nosedive. His final line in May came to .250/.317/.402, although he did belt 3 homers. As the season has worn on into late July, Wallace has not rebounded and his numbers have continued to decline. Also, and much to the chagrin of myself and many other fans, Wallace has been kept out of the lineup against many of the left handed starters the team has faced. Along with his declining numbers Wallace has experienced a decrease in playing time. While the team claims that this was the plan all along, the confidence of a young player can be a very delicate thing and many followers of the organization feel that Wallace has been mishandled. While Brett himself appears to be a fairly level-headed guy, I don’t doubt that this type of treatment would bother any player. The question I want to examine in this post is whether Wallace’s confidence has been damaged by his handling and whether his offensive output has suffered as a result.
One interesting chart I thought to throw together is a breakdown of the players in the first months of the season whose best monthly batting average (.350 or higher) exceeded their season average by more than a hundred points. Wallace fits into that category, but he is not alone (and in fact is joined by another familiar name):
|
|
|
AVG (Month) |
AVG (YR) |
Difference |
|
Wallace |
April |
0.388 |
0.280 |
-0.108 |
|
Lance Berkman |
April |
0.393 |
0.286 |
-0.107 |
|
April |
0.398 |
0.274 |
-0.124 |
|
|
May |
0.414 |
0.292 |
-0.122 |
|
|
May |
0.384 |
0.254 |
-0.130 |
A month is an admittedly arbitrary time period selection, but I think this is an interesting look at how relatively infrequent it is to have a one month outlier so far above a season line. Also, batting average alone is not a great indicator of a batter’s performance, so the relevance of these numbers is limited.
But let’s bring on some more charts! I’ll start with a month by month breakdown of some of Wallace’s key stats through today’s game. The first three categories are the Astros’ games, the games in which Wallace has appeared (even just as a "defensive" replacement), and the games in which he started. As you can see, Wallace has started 80 out of the 98 games played this year (roughly 83%), but his playing time has taken a much larger hit in recent weeks.
|
Month |
G (Astros) |
G (Wallace) |
Starts |
AB |
H |
XBH |
HR |
BB |
SO |
AVG |
wOBA |
|
April |
27 |
26 |
24 |
85 |
33 |
10 |
1 |
10 |
16 |
.388 |
.430 |
|
May |
28 |
28 |
24 |
92 |
23 |
8 |
3 |
9 |
24 |
.250 |
.310 |
|
June |
27 |
25 |
22 |
74 |
17 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
24 |
.230 |
.299 |
|
July |
16 |
14 |
11 |
45 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
.222 |
.224 |
|
Total |
98 |
93 |
81 |
296 |
83 |
26 |
4 |
34 |
78 |
.280 |
.333 |
For reference, a good wOBA is roughly similar to a good OBP
In May, Wallace put up a mediocre BB/SO ratio but slugged 3 home runs. In June he only collected 5 extra base hits but his BB/SO ratio improved to 15/24. Despite these positive signs, Wallace only really put it all together in April. In July, the month in which he has had the least amount of relative playing time; Wallace has just 3 XBH and has yet to walk against 14 strikeouts. To put it simply, Wallace has been only a step above Chone Figgins territory- very bad. But does confidence have something to do with Wallace’s recent struggles?
Measuring pressure situations in baseball and "clutch" hitting is certainly an inexact science. For the purposes of this article, I borrowed some splits from Fangraphs and did a little number crunching of my own to get a better idea of how Wallace’s season has played out.
First up are the Fangraphs numbers:
|
AB |
H |
HR |
BB |
SO |
AVG |
wOBA |
|
|
Low Leverage |
138 |
32 |
1 |
11 |
39 |
.232 |
.276 |
|
Med. Leverage |
129 |
46 |
3 |
17 |
28 |
.357 |
.413 |
|
High Leverage |
26 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
.154 |
.204 |
|
Bases Empty |
175 |
56 |
4 |
17 |
45 |
.320 |
.384 |
|
Men on Base |
118 |
26 |
0 |
17 |
31 |
.220 |
.257 |
|
RISP |
69 |
14 |
0 |
11 |
14 |
.203 |
.232 |
The bottom 3 rows are self-explanatory, but the first triplet beg some explanation. Fangraphs attributes the leverage index numbers to Inside the Book. Here is their explanation of "clutch." From their site:
We'll define a high-pressure situation as one in which runs are needed in the very near future but the game is not yet out of hand: i.e., any plate appearance in the eighth inning or later in which the batting team is trailing by one, two, or three runs. Again, there really is no perfect definition of a "clutch" or high-pressure situation, but this will do just fine for our analysis. All other PA will be classified as "non-clutch."
So there at least is a basic frame of reference for the leverage numbers above. As vindicated by his low RBI total, Wallace has hit quite poorly in high leverage situations and with runners in scoring position. Interestingly, his best performance has come in medium-leverage situations. Also, his walk rate is far better in medium and high leverage moments as well as with runners on. Taken all together, this data suggests to me a player who is confident enough in his own abilities that he can be patient and provide good at-bats in high pressure situations. While there is arguably plenty of evidence of pressing and anxiety in important situations, that is to be expected of a young player in his first full season, in my mind, and I expect it to average out somewhat in the long run. But other opinions are certainly valid here, so make of it what you will. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to find monthly splits of these numbers, so it is hard to get a sense of the progression through the season.
Lastly, I dug through game logs and splits to come up with a list of the days Wallace either sat out or did not start.
|
Not in Game |
Not Starting |
Not Starting |
|
24-Apr |
12-Apr |
1-Jun |
|
11-Jun |
17-Apr |
8-Jun |
|
30-Jun |
6-May |
28-Jun |
|
2-Jul |
15-May |
4-Jul |
|
18-Jul |
20-May |
7-Jul |
|
|
23-May |
16-Jul |
That is a fair amount of games for a regular even accounting for regular rest days. As you can see, Wallace has been left out of the lineup 17 times overall, but 5 times already in July (which also includes the All Star break. I went through each of these games and looked at Wallace’s next 3 games after returning to the starting lineup. Here are the stats for those games. There was some overlap when Wallace’s off days were close together, so I have denoted any departure from the 3 game criterion in the rightmost column
|
|
AB |
H |
BB |
SO |
|
|
12-Apr |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
17-Apr |
12 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
24-Apr |
12 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
6-May |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
15-May |
12 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
20-May |
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
23-May |
11 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
1-Jun |
11 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
8-Jun |
8 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
2 G |
|
11-Jun |
8 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
28-Jun |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 G |
|
30-Jun |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 G |
|
2-Jul |
4 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 G |
|
4-Jul |
9 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
2 G |
|
7-Jul |
12 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
|
|
16-Jul |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 G |
|
18-Jul |
8 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 G |
|
|
AVG |
||||
|
YR |
144 |
43 |
11 |
39 |
.299 |
The major disclaimer on this chart is that the sample size is so small and arbitrary that numbers can be skewed in all sorts of directions. What I hoped to gain from this chart was merely a sense of how Wallace was able to bounce back immediately after sitting out of the starting lineup. While the 11/39 BB/SO ratio is a bit ugly, the .299 average is decent, and above Wallace’s season line. Honestly, I’m not sure what conclusion to draw from this. But I’ll make one anyway. I would encourage anyone who read this entire post to draw their own and leave it in the comments.
From my study of Wallace’s season, I think I can conclude that his confidence has not been badly damaged. However, he is a young player and he needs to play! He needs experience batting against left-handed pitching and in high pressure situations while the Astros are bad and the results barely matter anyway. All the data above is to me not indicative of a player who lacks confidence but a player who lacks experience. Wallace needs to be on the field so that he can gain experience. Sitting him so often only breaks his rhythm. If the Astros really want to find out what they have in Wallace, they need to give him this season completely to see how he handles it and to let him amass MLB experience. He may never be even an average starting first baseman, but there is no one knocking at the door and now is the time to give him a shot. In my opinion, Wallace has looked a bit lost out there recently because he is basically a rookie, not because his confidence has been shattered.
One last thing: While I watch a lot of baseball, read a lot about baseball, and sift through pages of stats, this is my first attempt at packaging it all together into a cohesive reading experience. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated, either about the choice of stats or the writing. Thanks for reading!
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
oops, the graphs didn't come out very well
hopefully they are still easy enough to read. does anyone know a better way to import tables?
also
david, timmy, subber, clack, et al: after spending a few hours researching and writing this i’ve gained a newfound respect for all the work you put into the site every week on game/MiLB recaps and all the other articles. it is one thing to glace through a box score. putting an article together is a beast of a different nature. thanks for making this site so great!
by strophi on Jul 20, 2011 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice post
You did a good job there.
You can definitely make the argument that Wallace’s struggles are a confidence thing, but its definitely tough to determine if he has less confidence in himself in certain situations. I agree with you as I’m sure many here do that Left handed or right handed pitching should not matter, Wallace needs to play. For the sake of argument though if it is a confidence thing then you could make the case that maybe Mills is trying to place Wallace in situations where he has a greater probability for success (righties) thus trying to protect his confidence until he gets back into a rhythm. I seriously doubt that’s the case, but you never know.
I think that the sample size issue in certain stressful situations that you hinted at is a more likely case for his struggles over lack of confidence, although I doubt there would be anyway to try and figure that one out. I guess only Wallace knows what is going on inside of that head.
I think that young proven minor leaguers should be given every opportunity to succeed, which means definitely this whole season before we pass judgement. Maybe he comes on strong in the second half and shows promise for next year. This is especially true since the Astros aren’t competing anytime soon. They have nothing to lose by giving him every chance to succeed first. Now if Hinze is duplicating this year, at this time next year and Wallace is still struggling then the decision gets tougher, but as for now since no one is knocking on the door Wallace needs the opportunites.
by conroestro on Jul 21, 2011 12:29 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Could be faced with a tough scenario next season
Now if Hinze is duplicating this year, at this time next year and Wallace is still struggling then the decision gets tougher, but as for now since no one is knocking on the door Wallace needs the opportunites.
^^This
If Hinze were to somehow come close to duplicating his Lancaster numbers in CC, then we might have problems come next Spring Training if Wallace ends up with a line of .280/7/50. First base is a power hitting position and I don’t think rebuilding with the second coming of J.T. Snow sans the defense is the right way to go about it. However, it is Wallace’s first full season and he deserves some leeway as do most young players, but I don’t think its in Crane’s best interest to have his GM(s) hold back younger, more talented prospects for too long if the young starter in the bigs is not meeting expectations. I’m not advocating pulling the trigger too fast, but don’t sit on it like Astros management has done in the past.
"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips
by H-town Fanatic on Jul 21, 2011 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
^^^^oops...screwed up the quote function. Sorry.
"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips
by H-town Fanatic on Jul 21, 2011 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice post
You did a good job there.
You can definitely make the argument that Wallace’s struggles are a confidence thing, but its definitely tough to determine if he has less confidence in himself in certain situations. I agree with you as I’m sure many here do that Left handed or right handed pitching should not matter, Wallace needs to play. For the sake of argument though if it is a confidence thing then you could make the case that maybe Mills is trying to place Wallace in situations where he has a greater probability for success (righties) thus trying to protect his confidence until he gets back into a rhythm. I seriously doubt that’s the case, but you never know.
I think that the sample size issue in certain stressful situations that you hinted at is a more likely case for his struggles over lack of confidence, although I doubt there would be anyway to try and figure that one out. I guess only Wallace knows what is going on inside of that head.
I think that young proven minor leaguers should be given every opportunity to succeed, which means definitely this whole season before we pass judgement. Maybe he comes on strong in the second half and shows promise for next year. This is especially true since the Astros aren’t competing anytime soon. They have nothing to lose by giving him every chance to succeed first. Now if Hinze is duplicating this year, at this time next year and Wallace is still struggling then the decision gets tougher, but as for now since no one is knocking on the door Wallace needs the opportunites.
by conroestro on Jul 21, 2011 12:29 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Not sure why the double happened. Please forgive me.
by conroestro on Jul 21, 2011 12:30 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I know I am in the minority, but I think Wallace should be platooned against tough LHPs. If he has struggles with confidence or any other reason, then you put him in the best opportunities to succeed, which is against RHPs. If he had been hitting against every LHP, I think his batting average might be so low at this point that there would be pressure to remove him as a starter. (Wallace has a .211 BA and .222 OBP and .537 OPS vs. LHPs this year.) My thought is that he can transition to hitting against all pitchers once he has gotten confidence from hitting well in the situations where the odds are better for success. This isn’t an unusual way to handle hitters. There have been Hall of Fame hitters who were platooned their first couple of seasons in the majors.
I comparing Wallace’s more recent lineup frequency to his plunge in offensive production over the same period, it’s a “chicken and egg” problem for causation. As he continues to struggle more at the plate, the manager naturally gives him more time off, hoping that the break will allow him to re-group.
The offensive drop off by Wallace was somewhat foreseeable. Wallace had a completely unsustainable BABIP around .380 as late as last month, and it was obvious that we would see some regression. We just didn’t know what his true BABIP level should be. I wrote an article suggesting .320 or so might be a normal level for him, and that was somewhat optimistic. If that’s the case, his seasonal BABIP of .366 is still higher than sustainable.
Wallace also has large splits favoring home over the road. That may not mean much, due to sample size and a normal tendency to hit better at home. But it’s possible that it reflects greater confidence in MMP.
I think we may see a resurgence by Wallace at some point this season. But, frankly, I am becoming pessimistic that he will be the Astros’ first baseman of the future.
good points
I have no problem with resting Wallace against tough lefty starters, but it seems that even against lesser opponents Wallace has been pulled. It isn’t like Jason Michaels needs playing time.
I also acknowledge that chicken and egg causation you point out. That is most evident in the last table showing Wallace’s next handful of ABs after sitting. I realize it can’t tell us much, but I just wanted to examine whether or not Wallace had an exaggerated tendency to press or be discouraged/frustrated after sitting. It doesn’t seem that he is.
We knew of course that Wallace would not be able to sustain his ridiculous April BABIP and average. But that isn’t the dropoff that is concerning for me. What concerns me most is the dropoff in his walk rate. He has yet to walk this month and continues to strike out. His line drive percentage has also dropped considerably to 16.1% in July. It was at least 20% for the first 3 months. So he just isn’t making good contact as frequently as he did earlier in the season.
Frankly, I concur with your pessimism. It seems increasingly less likely that he will carry a high enough OBP to offset his low SLG and make him a viable starter. I do think, however, that he should be given the time requisite to proving what he is or is not capable of.
It’s possible that pitchers adjusted to Wallace after his hot April, and that Wallace simply hasn’t been able to make his own adjustments. There seem to be some common elements to the way pitcher have been able to get swings and misses with inside breaking pitches. I haven’t really analyzed it, but that is my impression.
I agree to a point. The operative phrase in my opinion is “tough lefties”. I have no problem with Mills giving Wallace the day off against Clayton Kershaw, Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, etc.
Early in the season it seemed like Wallace was still starting against about 50% of lefties. Now Wallace rarely starts against lefties at all. No reason Wallace shouldn’t be getting ABs against a Paul Maholm, Tom Gorzelanny, etc. Wallace has a minor league track record of hitting lefties, and the only way he’ll get better is to face at least some lefties.
If the Astros were in the playoff chase, things would be different. But they are out of it and need to give playing time to the young guys.
I think you do the opposite
Yoy don’t sit him at all. Let him take his lumps, if he has what it takes he’ll figure it out, if doesn’t then you move on to the next guy.
I think you sit him down and say, “You are not coming out against any type of pitcher, you are the 1B for this team.” Right now every Astros game has very little meaning for the Astros as far a pennant goes, so the only pressure is just to produce. Either you can or you can’t. The Astros need to know if he can, and giving him yo-yo playing time does more to hurt his confidence than him going through a 0-15 slump. Hell, Robin Ventura was able to recover from a 0-62 to become a very good MLB player.
Benching him in favor of Jason Michaels is a Tim Pupura type move.
by Neil Leininger on Jul 21, 2011 10:52 AM CDT reply actions
I suppose we have different views on how you develop players. I think the sink or swim approach at the ML level leads to a lot of mistakes. That’s good for the teams which pick the guys up after they have been DFA’d and then figure out how to use them productively and turn them into ML players.
Biggo, Bagwell, Caminiti, Finley, and Gonzales disagree
with your approach.
by Neil Leininger on Jul 21, 2011 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Think it has to be somewhere in between
I think the Astros have ruined a ton of prospects in the past by not being confident in giving them an all out shot at making the pro team. I think in the last 15 years or so we have had alot of guys that have rotted in our farm system. I hate to bring up his name again but Bogesevic is a prime example. We should have shipped him off in a deal somewhere or something because by the time he gets any playing time he will be 30. I think what Neil is trying to say if we are committed to rebuilding this year lets get on with it.
I may be old fashioned, but I think players have to show they deserve a major league promotion before they get called up. I think players have be sent the message that they have to excel in AAA. Bogusevic’s AAA offensive line this season does not demonstrate that he deserves to be a major league player. A batting average around .250 and a .700 OPS does not usually get a corner outfielder a trip to the majors. The only reason Bogusevic is on the roster is because he is lefthanded and can PH against RHP and Bourgeois suffered an injury.
I don’t know what they think personally about the question. But Finley and Gonzales certainly were given some platoon treatment early in their careers. Steve Finley’s rookie season was 1989 with the Orioles and he started against 7 LHPs in the 85 starts he was given. By the time that Finley was traded to the Astros, he was in his 3d ML season and deserved maximum playing time. Brett Wallace is on pace for 555 plate appearances this season. Gonzales received 526 PA in his rookie year, 1991, and 416 PA in 1992. It’s hard to figure out how much platooning was involved in Gonzales’ rookie season, but clearly Wallace is on pace to get similar or more playing time.
An example of an Astros’ hitter who benefitted from early platooning and eventually transitioned to a full time starter of all star quality was Morgan Ensberg. I think he is a good example of a hitter who built up his confidence first as a less than full time position player. On his blog a few months ago, Ensberg said that he did not resent platooning with Mike Lamb and believed that manager Jimy Williams did the right thing by starting his career with the platoon.
There are ...
… times when platooning and limiting playing time can benefit a young player. However, in Wallace’s case I firmly believe he needs to be playing everyday so he can establish some routine/rhythm. One of my biggest complaints is Mills yanking Wallace out of every game early. It seems as though it’s been that way for a month now. I don’t buy the 555 at-bat pace – not when you take into account the steady decline in at-bats he has experienced month by month. Wally is one of my favorite players and Mills management of him has cause me a lot of heartache and frustration. PLEASE, let him play!!!!!!!
I don’t think there is anything wrong with saying he is on pace for 555 PAs. I went back and looked at Wallace’s games started per month as a percent of total number of games in a month.
March/April 88%
May 86%
June 88%
July 79%
The percentage basically has remained the same until this month. And I think the July percentage is skewed by the small number of games so far (14), due to the All Star Break and the fact that the month isn’t over. After the month is completed, I would expect the percentage to be in the 82% range.
I agree that Wallace is more likely to get less at bats per game starts than other starters. That may cost him 50 or so at bats over the course of a year.
my calculations came out a bit differently
i had him at 89/86/81/69% for April/May/June/July. I could be wrong though. I just searched through the game logs
I was using the batting splits page, and I think the “G” column is the wrong one to use for total games.
I cross-referenced the astros schedule with wallace’s individual game log. i double checked with the specific box scores and wallace has started just 11 of 16 games this month (69%)
OK. My guess is he will be around 75% for July by month’s end. And I still think he will be around 550 PA at year end, assuming that he doesn’t get injured (which seems like he won’t, since he is built like a tank). Let’s wait and see how it ends up.
The point I'm trying to make
is what if Hinze duplicates his Lancaster stats in higher leagues, but you still don’t know what you have in Brett Wallace, because you haven’t played him enough to see.
The Astros took a chance on Eric Anthony, he struggled initially, then he put up a 18-80 year and the Astros flipped him for Mike Hampton when more talented OFs were acquired or came up through the system.
I firmly believe that you should not be married to any one prospect until he prooves that he’s worth keeping, but at the same time you should not keep them from playing in case another team may find that prospect worth acquiring if you have another guy that’s better ready to take their place.
However if you play him like you are doing then no one is going to want him, and you are just wasting the chance to move him for another piece that might turn out to be better.
At least see if he has the dedication and gumption to work out of this funk
Hard to do that sitting every other day or only getting two AB’s a game. Which him getting pulled early doesnt make sense because earlier this year he had one of the high BA from the 7th after.
^^^I posted this...kind of
"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips
by H-town Fanatic on Jul 21, 2011 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions
If you let Wallace hit in the most favorable situations (which I think will be against RHPs), he will have a higher chance of increasing his slash stats, and that should make him more valuable if you want to trade him. If Wallace can’t put up a good batting line in the most favorable situations, then he probably isn’t going to succeed at all.
The leash should be shorter if everyone is young and unproven.
Nobody gets a pass just because they were an A+ prospect traded for Roy Oswalt or Lance Berkman.
If you are rebuilding and you’ve got competition at certain positions, then you give the guy you’re going with little leeway to prove himself. If he struggles for three months straight, then its time to try something else. Nobody is untouchable in the Astros current state.
And even if Wallace turns this long decline around and ends up batting around .300 but continues to lack power, he is still a liability at a power hitting position.
"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips
by H-town Fanatic on Jul 21, 2011 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice job strophi
I’m late to the discussion, but wanted to acknowledge your efforts on this.
Astros fan for life
by Joe in Birmingham on Jul 26, 2011 2:43 PM CDT reply actions

by 



























