Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

How Will Minute Maid Park Affect Hall and Barmes?

Over at Beyond the Box Score, they published a really neat article calculating the park factors for the past five years of all the major league ballparks. Instead of focusing just on run environment, the author digs into all the relevant events in the game like home runs, doubles, and even walks and strikeouts. Here are the numbers he came up with for Houston:

Team Years R/G PA/G SO/PA BB/PA 1B/BIP 2B/BIP 3B/BIP HR/BIP SB/G CS/G TB/BIP BIP/PA
HOU 5 0.98 1.00 1.03 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.07 1.06 0.99 0.96 1.01 0.99

 

That confirms a lot of what we have come to know over the years. MMP plays pretty neutral in terms of runs scored, after pitchers learned how to use that deep outfield. There are more doubles and home runs hit there, but fewer singles and doubles (just slightly) than the league average.

What I'm interested in doing is comparing these numbers to Colorado and Boston to see in what areas Bill Hall and Clint Barmes may improve upon in 2011, just by switching parks. Obviously, there are other factors at work, like aging, pitching and the like, but this should give us a place to start with these guys.

Star-divide

First, let's look at both Colorado and Boston's park factors:

Team Years R/G PA/G SO/PA BB/PA 1B/BIP 2B/BIP 3B/BIP HR/BIP SB/G CS/G TB/BIP BIP/PA
COL 5 1.09 1.01 0.95 0.98 1.02 1.04 1.18 1.08 0.98 0.99 1.05 1.02
BOS 5 1.04 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.16 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.97 1.01 1.01

 

Both have a full five years of data, just like MMP. In each case, the run environment is significantly better than in Houston. But, since runs have very little to do with player skill and more to do with lineup construction, I don't know that the switch in parks can be directly linked to lower or higher runs scored for each guy next season.

Both parks also have slightly higher factors for singles. Boston and Houston are very close, while Colorado is slightly higher. I'd expect Barmes average to drop a little more and Hall's to stay about the same, all things being equal. Because of the Green Monster, Fenway has a huge park factor for doubles. That's where Hall will probably take the biggest hit in his 2011 numbers.

However, Fenway was also very unforgiving on home runs. Only four parks had lower factors on home runs per ball in play than Fenway did. Since Houston's is the eighth-highest, we can reasonably expect Hall's home run total to uptick some. Unlike Pedro Feliz last season, who went from the seventh-highest park factor to the eighth), there is some basis for making a wild claim like that.

Barmes, though, may suffer from a drop across the board. Every single offensive category was higher in Colorado than it will be in Houston. His batting average, his slugging percentage, his total bases all should fall either a little or a lot in 2011. Again, that's to be expected, as we all knew his home/road splits weren't great last season.

Neither player should walk much more just based on park factor. There was some discussion in the original article about whether park factors really do influence strikeouts and walks. A hitter prone to strikeouts will whiff no matter where they are hitting. But, it's worth noting that both of these guys are moving from parks with slightly lower strikeout totals than average to a park with a higher-than-average number. That may affect Hall more than Barmes, as he's been more prone to the "K" than Barmes has in his career.

The only other thing we may be able to glean is that MMP has a slightly higher stolen base rate than either other park. With Barmes, I'm not sure if it'll up his numbers, but I'm pretty sure Hall could hit double-digit steals for the first time since 2005.

What do you think? Is there anything else we can learn from this? Does this affect your expectations for these two players? Are you surprised by any of the MMP factors?

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hall was a pull hitter as I recall

I think LF will benefit him and I don’t think it matters where he plays as far as walks go.

by ol Pete on Jan 7, 2011 9:02 AM CST reply actions  

Here is hittracker’s 2010 page on Hall.

He hit 10 HR on the road and 8 HR at Fenway in exactly the same number of PAs (191).

He will probably get more gametime at one position, which should help. Some players just don’t like being in a platoon i.e. they like to play everyday.

On the stat’s he’s got quite a few HRs over 400 to left centre field (I can’t remember the distance to the pump in left centre).

by AstroB on Jan 7, 2011 9:08 AM CST reply actions  

Hey!

Three of them were off of Shaun Marcum. I do not approve.

But all but 4 were left of about 114 degrees. I wonder what the position of that crook in the left field wall is.

by ol Pete on Jan 7, 2011 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Hall will have a great year; 20+ HRs. Barmes probably will come down a little from his Colorado #’s, but overall will be a solid offensive player at the bottom of the lineup.

by Snake Diggity on Jan 7, 2011 2:33 PM CST reply actions  

I usually think of Fenway Park as the most similar ballpark to Minute Maid Park. The distance and high wall in LF are similar. That is one reason I liked the Hall acquistion. Because the Green Monster is higher than the Crawford Box wall, maybe a double or two will turn into HRs. But, interestingly, only 6 of of Hall’s 16 doubles were flies or line drives to LF. 2 doubles were groundballs; 6 doubles were LDs or flies to LF; and CF and RF each had 4 doubles in the air.

Hall’s batting average on flyballs to LF was a phenomonal .613 (consider that overall batting averages on flyballs generally are in the low or mid .200’s.) Why? 14 of his 19 flyball hits to LF went for HRs; that’s 14 of 31 total fly balls to LF going out of the park. I think that says a lot about his pull power to LF.

All 8 of Barmes’ HRs were flyballs to LF. Although Barmes overall batting average on fly balls is only .156, he had a batting average of .304 on flyballs to LF—he had 14 flyball hits, with 6 going for doubles and 8 going for HRs. He obviously has a lot of pull power to LF, but the Coors Field effect may distort what we can expect in the future.

by clack on Jan 7, 2011 2:53 PM CST reply actions  

Hall was quoted

when asked about the short porch in LF he said he was looking forward more to the big alley in right field. Who knows what his plan will be when the season starts but he needs to cut down on the Ks. Barmes…lets hope he shines on defense. Any improvement over Manzella offensively is a plus.

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 7, 2011 3:47 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Since you mentioned the big alley in RF, MMP is a good park for triples (as Michael Bourn can attest). Note the 1.07 park factor for triples (compared to .93 at Fenway). Since Hall has good speed, he may pick up a few triples moving to MMP.

by clack on Jan 7, 2011 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Great point. He said when he was at his best in Milwaukee, he was going the opposite way. And playing every day.

by jmike on Jan 7, 2011 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

for a guy that hasn’t paid attention to Hall previously, when you say he has good speed, is there a comparison you could make? Pence fast? Bourn fast? Less than Pence higher than Kepp?

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 7, 2011 4:32 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Bill James’s “speed score” is a combination of 4 components: stolen base percentage, frequency of stolen base attempts, percentage of triples, and runs scored percentage. It’s not a perfect measure of “speed”, but it does give a rough idea of a player’s quickness and his baserunning abilities. Here are the 2010 speed scores for a handful of the Astros:

M. Bourn: 7.8 (top 5 in baseball, qualified players only)
H. Pence: 5.2
B. Hall: 4.7
J. Keppinger: 3.0
C. Lee: 2.3

He’ll be a lot closer to Pence than Keppinger in speed terms.

by AstroAndy on Jan 7, 2011 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Fascinating. Hadn’t heard of this before.

by jmike on Jan 7, 2011 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

It has been a couple of years since I watched Hall in CF, but he seemed fast…I would guess that his speed is similar or better than Pence’s. Another metric is James’ baserunning analysis, which calculates bases added on the base paths. Hall has always been positive, with a +9 in 2010, which is very good for a part time player. Hall’s best season was +15 in 2005. Pence was +13 last year. It was Pence’s best base running season (he has been negative previously—showing that base running is a skill and not just speed).

by clack on Jan 8, 2011 8:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chimp_small
The Importance of George Springer

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oswalt in 2012
Small
Heck and Co. - Your time is up.
Small
Santana and a bold new top 10, etc..
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Lance Berkman with possible torn ACL...
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Quasi update on Lucas Giolito for draft
100_1519_small
Good News
Small
Thinking about where the top 2012 draftees will be ranked for 2013
Astros_small
Most valuable building blocks
Nsapcs13_large_small
Minor League Open Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

TCB Tweets!

    

Current Series

Astros lead the series 1-0

Fri 05/25 WP: Lucas Harrell (4 - 3)
SV: Brett Myers
LP: Clayton Kershaw (4 - 2)
3 - 1 win

Houston Astros
@ Los Angeles Dodgers

Saturday, May 26, 2012, 9:10 PM CDT
Dodger Stadium

Bud Norris vs Chad Billingsley

Mostly clear. Winds blowing out to right field at 5-15 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 65.

Complete Coverage >

Sun 05/27 3:10 PM CDT

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Cincinnati 25 20 .555 0 Lost 1
St. Louis 25 21 .543 0.5 Lost 2
Houston 22 23 .488 3 Won 4
Pittsburgh 21 24 .466 4 Won 1
Milwaukee 19 26 .422 6 Won 2
Chicago 15 30 .333 10 Lost 10

(updated 5.26.2012 at 6:14 PM CDT)

Yahoo_full_count

Managing Editors

Tcb_icon_small Timothy De Block

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

H_astros_small Subber10

Astrobritrs2_small AstroB

Small conroestro

Small CRPerry13