Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The Astros defensive impact for 2011

Earlier this month I brought forth the idea that while the Astros were saying they were trying to improve the offense, the real focus was instead improving the defense. I'd like to expand upon that idea and while I'm not one for predicting the future, I think it's safe to assume that the 2011 Astros should improve on defense over the 2010 squad.

First we'll break down the 2010 statistics with the focus being Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) and Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR). Two positions that will not be covered is pitcher (i know you're disappointed about not being able to discuss Wandy's defensive prowess) and catcher, the reason being there just isn't enough defensive statistics to sift through to give us a clear picture.

In 2010 there were only three positions in which the Astros ranked above average in both DRS and UZR. Centerfield, rightfield, and yes first base. Obviously your familiar with Michael Bourn and Hunter Pence defensive prowess, but what you may not know is that Lance Berkman has been above average defensively at first base over his career. Both Brett Wallace and Carlos Lee did nothing to hurt that ranking either as they performed at an average to above average level defensively, albeit a small sample size.

Star-divide

That leaves second base, shortstop, third base, and left field as areas of below average defensive play. We are all aware of the issue with having Lee in left field, but surprisingly shortstop and third base ranked just as bad defensively last year. When you take a moment to think about it though it's not really all that surprising. Both Tommy Manzella, and Chris Johnson struggles defensively are well documented. Angel Sanchez doesn't have the range to play short, and Pedro Feliz was ineffective defensively at third. As for second base it was closer to the other positions than to being average.

So where do the Astros go from here?

Well Barmes and Hall should solidify the Astros middle of the infield. Last year Barmes posted a 14 DRS and a 4.3 UZR in 361 innings, granted it's a small sample size, but over 2689.2 career innings (333 games) he's posted well above average numbers defensively. Even if we were to be pessimistic with predictions about Barmes defense he's still a significant upgrade over who the Astros employed at the position in 2010.

On the other side of the second base bag, Bill Hall, is a little harder to predict. While Hall has excelled at other positions, at this point and time he appears to be at best average at second base. His -3 DRS and -3.5 UZR indicate he was below average last year, but those numbers are still a slight upgrade over the Astros second base situation in 2010, who combined for a -9 DRS and -3.7 UZR. Over Hall's career he has spent 1176.1 innings (155 games) at second with only about average results. Given a full season he could prove to be at least average at the position due to his range, and because he has excelled at the other more demanding positions. There is hope, but there's also a question mark.

The only other position in which the Astros could see significant improvement defensively is in left field, in which case Brett Wallace would have to fail miserably for that to occur. Moving Lee to first base would be the most significant improvement the Astros could do to improve the ball club defensively. Putting even just an average outfielder in left field in place of Lee last year would of resulted in a near positive 15 to 20 point swing in both DRS and UZR. I have every reason to believe that a Jason Michaels/Brian Bogusevic platoon in left would result in above average play defensively.

That leaves Michael Bourn, Hunter Pence, and Chris Johnson. With both Bourn and Pence heading into their fifth Major League season we can expect above average defense from at least two-thirds of the outfield. Johnson on the other hand is heading into his first full season, and while last years defensive numbers were not pretty, they are considered a small sample size. Given a full season of data we will be better able to pin point his defense at third, but given his age and more experience we should see an improvement in those numbers.

Overall the Astros ranked 19th  in UZR (-13) and 22nd in DRS (-20), which is well below average. The addition of Barmes should significantly upgrade the shortstop position, while Hall should at least keep the status quo if not improve it slightly. Bourn and Pence should continue to do their thing, and even Johnson should improve upon his defensive numbers. The biggest defensive improvement to bad is still in question however. In the small amount of data we do have Wallace does have better defense at first, but moving Lee to first would provide a 15-20 positive swing in both UZR and DRS. That alone could make the Astros defense average, however even if El Caballo is found to be roaming the outfield the defense should still be improved.

Of the teams that made the postseason last year only the Phillies and Braves were considered below average in either DRS or UZR. Both teams were knocked off by the defensive sound Giants, who ranked in the top three for both statistics. Just because the Astros didn't add enough offense this offseason, doesn't mean they aren't moving in the right direction.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Chris Johnson’s defense has to improve or he will have difficulty holding a starter position during his career. Two-thirds of Johnson’s negative UZR is due to errors (18 errors in half a season). His range was negative, but perhaps the small sample size has something to do with that. However, even if that is reflective of his future range, then his UZR would only be one third of the negative value if Johnson can be more or less average with those throwing errors. His UZR/150 would decline from -17.6 to -5.

As I’ve said before, my view of Hall’s potential defense is based on the totality of his infield metrics rather than just 2d base. The sample size at 2d base for Hall is much smaller than shortstop and 3d base over his career. He has 2,186 innings at shortstop, 2,003 innings at third base, and 1,176 innings at 2d base. Based on DRS career numbers, Hall is +1 at 2d base, +6 at 3d base, and +17 at shortstop. From the Red Sox fan comments I’ve read, Hall committed several errors when he initially was placed at 2d base by the Red Sox when Pedroia was injured, but played well after he got used to playing there again. DRS doesn’t break out errors, but UZR does. UZR indicates that almost all of his negative UZR was due to errors rather than range.

Although catcher defense is hard to measure, I feel like the Astros will have one of the better defensive catcher combos. On a few of the advanced metrics I’ve seen for catchers, the 2010 Quintero is showing up as one of the top five defensive catchers in baseball. Castro is well above average at controlling the running game, but he needs to work on blocking pitches, since he seemed to have some problems with wild pitches/passed balls. Assuming that Castro can improve in that area, he could join Quintero as one of the better defensive catchers in baseball.

by clack on Jan 31, 2011 9:01 AM CST reply actions  

What does it matter?

You can bring up all the stats you want, but in reality what does it matter. Seattle was supposed to have a legendary defense and look where it got them in the end. It doesn’t matter if you lose 3-2 or 6-2, the bottom line is that you still lose. Barmes nor Hall is that good of a player, nor is the improvement over previous year’s efforts enough to warrant speculating on a .500 season.

 I’m not making any predictions but nothing this team has done this off-season has looked impressive (other than signing Wandy long-term). Reports are out that Brett Wallace has a hole in his swing and his previous positive scouting reports might have erred (we may as well leave him in the minors until Lee’s contract is up). Maybe we should have picked up Cantu and seen if he could play the outfield or something, because we need some runs.

by FunkytownKing on Jan 31, 2011 10:59 AM CST reply actions  

Improving the defense is a lot less expensive.

Any significant offensive upgrade this offseason was going to require either good prospects or a lot of cash. With the Astros in some what of a rebuilding mode, and with the sale looming neither was an option. So yes the moves are unimpressive, but they should still have a positive impact on the team next season.

by Timothy De Block on Jan 31, 2011 11:11 AM CST up reply actions  

The Seattle example isn’t apt. Seattle is a significantly worse offensive team than the Astros were last season—-the Astros scored 100 more runs than the Mariners, and the Mariners had the advantage of a DH. Seattle was historically one of the worst baseball offenses in recent times. In the Seattle situation, I think marginal improvements in defense (say, trying to move from very good to best) are less effective compared to spending the money on offense. The Astros had a bad defense, as noted by Timmy’s post. Because the Astros defense is so bad, the marginal benefit of improving the defense is quite high. Suppose that defense, offense, and pitching are each roughly one third of the contribution to wins. The Astros had two thirds of team components which were bad. If the Astros can bring one third of team production (defense) from bad to average or slightly above average, the overall impact will be significant, since two thirds of the team’s contribution to wins is average to above average. Whether the Astros can achieve .500—-it’s possible, but I wouldn’t bet on it.

by clack on Jan 31, 2011 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Understood

Well said on the Seattle issue, but they play a different park etc. so while I’m sure that doesnt make up for all the 100 runs, it is cause for some adjustment and perspective.

My point was that we are trying to find ways to rationalize the moves made as if they really matter. WE could have just used the money spent on these guys to lock up Bourn and Pence and continued to tread water, since the result will probably be the same.

by FunkytownKing on Jan 31, 2011 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

and

You could argue that Seattle’s 2009 defense was better than their 2010 and they didn’t improve it. They lost the best defensive 3rd baseman in baseball (who can hit) and replaced him with Figgins who they then moved to the second base where he didn’t seem as good. Then Jack Wilson did play all that much either.

by ntn on Feb 1, 2011 4:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Wallas

Hole? I would have said his swing is slow/long/just not good. What is impressive is he has gotten this far with that swing. I’d like to see what he could do after an off season of Steve Englishbey’s attention.

I like Lee at first, Wallace at AAA and the best available in left.

by Seriously? on Jan 31, 2011 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm

Make that Wallace in the subject line. Apparently my typing is the equal of his swing.

by Seriously? on Jan 31, 2011 2:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice post timmy

Good points made by clack about Castros inability to block pitches in the dirt. I didn’t think anyone would mention that. I was surprised at first because comin from the minors you would think pitchers there have less control and he would have dealt with plenty of wild pitches. Then I remembered he was rushed through the system and didn’t have a lot of minor league experience. I think if Lee stays in left then our biggest defensive improvement will be at 3B. Im still high on Johnsons potential. Do remember his father is a coach and probably helped him iron out some things this offseason. And one more time, Im still really impressed with Wallaces defensive ability. He showed great instincts and composure throwing out lead runners. I don’t think we’ll see any decline in 1B defense if Wallace is there. 2B and SS we had Kepp and Manzella and with their replacements I don’t think the upgrades will be anything extreme as Manboy was good but had some rookie mistakes and Kepp was reliable which is said to be the base play for Hall. Im excited to see what we get on the field

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 31, 2011 3:14 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Quick (repeating) thought

If Jason Bourgeois proves he can man 2nd as well as dominate the outfield, he’s a shoe in to take one of the back up roles right? And say he out hits Mikey in ST. He is close to being as good defensively, and on the bases, could he win the starting CF job with Mikey as a back up? I know I have said it before but an outfield consisting of Bourgeois Bourn and Pence…that’s as good as it gets defensively. That’s exciting!

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 31, 2011 4:28 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

did you mean LF instead of CF?

by clack on Jan 31, 2011 5:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope

Its not too far fetched to think Jason could hit better than Mikey out of ST. If Jason is batting .320 and Mikey is batting .280 is there no chance that we could see Bourgeois as the opening day starter in CF?

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 31, 2011 6:37 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Sorry I see your point now...

to clarify: an outfield consisting of Bourgeois Bourn and Pence, and Jason starting over Mikey, are two different thoughts. I thought they were two interesting possibilities.

by Its Gonna Happen on Jan 31, 2011 6:41 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Good article

I agree that Wade has been trying to improve the defense. Hall for Keppinger is largely about defense and base running in my opinion.

by jmike on Jan 31, 2011 10:03 PM CST reply actions  

Liked the article

Out of curiosity I was wondering if anybody new Carlos Lee’s best UZR and DRS ratings in his early to prime years. Did he ever put up anything close to average in the earlier stages of his career?

by conroestro on Feb 1, 2011 12:37 AM CST reply actions  

Early in his Astros career, Lee wasn’t too bad defensively. In 2008, Carlos Lee was basically average (-0.4 UZR). In 2007, Lee was +1, according to DRS, and -3.2 according to UZR, which probably means that he was in the average range. Lee’s prime years as a defender were 2003 and 2004, whehn was well above average according to both UZR and DRS.

Lee’s defense detriorated a lot in 2009 and 2010, according to both DRS and UZR, when he posted double digit negative numbers.

by clack on Feb 1, 2011 8:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks. I was just wondering if Purpura knew at the time that Carlos was signed that he was getting someone as defensively unsound as Carlos was in his 2009, and 2010 season’s, or if at the time he thought that he was signing an average outfielder with an above average bat.

by conroestro on Feb 1, 2011 10:41 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

One of the main criticisms of the trade, at the time, was that Lee would not age well on defense, given his weight. So, Pupura should have been aware of the future risk as to his fielding. According to the advanced metrics, Lee also had a bad fielding season in 2006 when he was traded to the Rangers and tried to play LF in the Arlington ballpark. Despite that prior bad fielding season, Pupura probably could rightfully feel like Lee would be acceptable on defense, particularly in Minute Maid’s short left field, in the short term. The length of the contract was always a concern to critics.

by clack on Feb 1, 2011 11:02 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree the contract was ridiculous. Especially with the no trade clause he received even though his contract was a no trade clause in its self. It just seemed like Purpura severely overpaid for his services considering the fact that Lee already had a ranch in Texas and had interest in playing here. I figured those factors could have played up well for the astros signing him at a lesser cost and without the no-trade protection.

by conroestro on Feb 1, 2011 11:30 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

The Giants offered Lee more than the Astros ($110 M if I recall), and the Orioles offered about the same as the Astros. So, I’m sure that Pupura would point out that stiff competition existed for signing Lee. Whether the Astros could have offered less than they did and still sign Lee because he wanted to play in Texas, I really don’t know. But I doubt that he would have agreed to a big reduction in the contract, given the other offers. Based on what I and other blogged at time, without hindsight, the Astros had better, less risky options. The Astros could have promoted Luke Scott to the big leagues to start 2007. Several veteran stop gaps were available (I favored Moises Alou and others wanted Luis Gonzalez). It was well known that Adam Dunn wanted to play for his hometown team, Houston. If the Astros could use a stop gap in 2007, Adam Dunn might have decided to take the free agent route and sign with the Astros. Dunn would have helped on defense, but he would have been cheaper.

by clack on Feb 1, 2011 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

correction: “Dunn would not have helped on defense”

by clack on Feb 1, 2011 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I see your point. I would have loved to have seen them just go with Luke Scott at that time until better options presented themselves.

by conroestro on Feb 1, 2011 2:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chimp_small
The Importance of George Springer

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oswalt in 2012
Small
Heck and Co. - Your time is up.
Small
Santana and a bold new top 10, etc..
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Lance Berkman with possible torn ACL...
Astros_retro_logo1_small
Quasi update on Lucas Giolito for draft
100_1519_small
Good News
Small
Thinking about where the top 2012 draftees will be ranked for 2013
Astros_small
Most valuable building blocks
Nsapcs13_large_small
Minor League Open Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

TCB Tweets!

    

Current Series

Astros lead the series 1-0

Fri 05/25 WP: Lucas Harrell (4 - 3)
SV: Brett Myers
LP: Clayton Kershaw (4 - 2)
3 - 1 win

Houston Astros
@ Los Angeles Dodgers

Saturday, May 26, 2012, 9:10 PM CDT
Dodger Stadium

Bud Norris vs Chad Billingsley

Mostly clear. Winds blowing out to right field at 5-15 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 65.

Complete Coverage >

Sun 05/27 3:10 PM CDT

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Cincinnati 25 20 .555 0 Lost 1
St. Louis 25 21 .543 0.5 Lost 2
Houston 22 23 .488 3 Won 4
Pittsburgh 21 24 .466 4 Won 1
Milwaukee 19 26 .422 6 Won 2
Chicago 15 30 .333 10 Lost 10

(updated 5.26.2012 at 6:14 PM CDT)

Yahoo_full_count

Managing Editors

Tcb_icon_small Timothy De Block

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

H_astros_small Subber10

Astrobritrs2_small AstroB

Small conroestro

Small CRPerry13