The State of the Houston Astros
The Houston Astros are a beloved team for many of us. I grew up in the “good ole days” of the Killer B’s, Shane Reynolds, and playoff appearances. I took it for granted that my team was the best team. The team to beat. The classy team. Not only were the Houston Astros highly competitive on the field, but they had a front office—and a roster—compiled of people who remembered to be decent human beings.
Today’s Astros are not “your daddy’s team.” They are no longer the class of the National League. Far from it. Today they are a team of players who underperform, are over-valued (based on salary), and habitually lose more games than they win. That’s ok. I can handle that. But even in the doom-and- gloom times of the 2000 Astros, or in the midst of harsh losing streaks, the Houston Astros of old—the team I loved as a child—never (or at least the icons) complained publically like this group.
When Jeff Kent was brought into town, Craig Biggio certainly didn’t lead the parade for a guy coming in and playing his position and essentially forcing him to move to the outfield. Intead he had faith in the front office to make the best decision for the team. The offseason that Wagner was sent packing, Bagwell and Biggio personally made a trip to the Dominican home of Octavio Dotel and pleaded with him to be in shape and work hard so they can be champions.
Those same two leaders, Bagwell and Biggio, knowing their skills were declining and feeling a sense of urgency to win now, voluntarily postponed getting paid in order to free up payroll to get the pieces to put them over the top and win a World Series. Today we don’t have that. Today we have superstars who, without actually saying it, are saying they wouldn’t mind leaving the Astros. We have an overpaid outfielder who is struggling to hit his (albeit very large) belt size essentially saying he doesn’t mind playing for a loser so long as he’s near his ranch. The good ole days are gone.
But possibly the most disturbing change in these Astros in comparison to “my” Astros is in the front office. I remember when Julio Lugo (allegedly) assaulted his wife. He was sent packing immediately because we wouldn’t associate ourselves with that kind of character. Caminitti had been traded largely due to character issues. But not these Astros. We trade FOR a player linked to steroids. (Yes, I know the Mitchell report didn’t get released until the day after the Tejada trade, but if the front office didn’t have the slightest inclination that that was coming, then that’d be a whole other essay.) We sign a player who’s been arrested for domestic abuse. We have a player physically confront the general manager in the lunch room. Sure, there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for all of these signings, but why do we need to make such justifications for this team? It’d be one thing if these “bad boys” helped win a World Series. These guys are in the cellar in the National League.
And then there’s Max Sapp. In hind sight, he probably shouldn’t have been drafted when he was. He wasn’t a good prospect at any point during his professional career, and it unfortunately ended with his battle with viral meningitis. The Astros, much to my chagrin, stuck by his side throughout that fight, and always showed plenty of public support for him and his family. I thought so highly of the front office for everything involving Sapp. Until now. Sapp was on the verge of being cleared to play again by the doctors when the Astros decided it was time to release him. Sapp’s mother was distraught by this, stating the Astros had always said that Max had a place in their system when he was ready again. So, why, when he’s actually showing signs that he could return, do they turn their backs on him then?
Let me make this clear: I didn’t expect Sapp to come back, hit like crazy, and move up the ranks and into the bigs for a storybook ending. I expected Sapp to go to extended spring training, not hit very well or show much strength, and then, after a valiant effort, either retire from professional baseball or be outright released. Why not let him at least have that opportunity, Ed Wade? Why not let him say that he fought off death to have a shot to play baseball again? Instead, the Houston Astros, our Houston Astros, come off as a team saying “Max, you’ve always got a spot on this team….as long as you never consider taking us up on that offer.” Does that sound like the Houston Astros you remember? The ones you love? The ones you respected for so long?
Granted, I’m no insider and I’m certain I’m missing some key information. But that by no means doesn’t mean that this isn’t the public face of what used to be a respected major league franchise. It breaks my heart to see the state of the franchise in such shambles. I can handle poor seasons and terrible win-loss records. I’d still be a fan—chalk it up to trials and tribulations. But when we begin to sacrifice the morals that made us such a great thing to look up to, that’s when my fandom begins to falter. Drayton McLane, don’t worry about how rebuilding will affect how many people will attend your games and put money in your pocket. I’ll still come to games even you’re losing, and I won’t even do it with a paper bag on my head! But you’ll be hard pressed to find me supporting a team that shows no morals in its decision making process. Because that’s not the team I was raised to love. I want to cheer for the good guys. Whenever you’re ready, I’d appreciate you acting like it.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I know where you are coming from. I’m frustrated too. But, you’re not going to find two classier players than Roy Oswalt or Lance Berkman. And Id point out that the old front office signed Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte, who were also linked to PEDs.
It’s never fun when a team starts losing. But, if they turn things around, they might look like the Astros of old again.
That’s a fair point on Berkman and Oswalt, and by no means am I trying to understate their classiness. My point, if I conveyed it well, is based more along the lines that the Astros, from top to bottom, are seemingly less about the right way to play and more about the business of baseball. And those Astros aren’t the ones I remember from my youth. Perhaps that’s selective memory, perhaps not.
by The Advocate on May 7, 2010 7:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I found your perspective on the Max Sapp situation interesting. I know what you’ve said is only one side of the story, but if that’s true, it’s a sad state of affairs. As sad as it may be, professional baseball has a long history of treating players like assets, and jettisoning non performing assets without a humane attitude. That’s why the player’s union gained so much support and was needed. However, the union can’t do anything for minor leaguers, and the minor leaguers sometime aren’t treated well. My long winded point is this: I don’t buy the idea that Astros’ regime before Wade treated minor leaguers with more humanity. I think it’s an example of a cold business approach which isn’t unique to the Astros.
I don’t agree with you on the Myers signing. Personally, I think it would be immoral for baseball to deny Myers his opportunity to make a living based on one off-field incident which didn’t result in a conviction. Even beyond that, I think giving people second chances is a moral course of action for baseball teams. But that’s all a matter of opinion, and I realize others may disagree.
I wouldn’t feel to bad for Sapp he got a signing bonus over a million dollars, and I’m pretty sure the Astros paid for all his medical bills. If he’s good enough he’ll find a place to land, if not he’s still set up for life and can pursue anything his heart desires.
by Timothy De Block on May 7, 2010 9:57 PM CDT reply actions
It shouldn’t be about how much his signing bonus was for. Yes, the Astros helped him financially through a difficult stage in his life, but I can almost guarantee Max Sapp wasn’t wanting to come back to baseball primarily to make more money. It’s about the insensitivity of claiming Max Sapp has a place in the organization right up until the point to here he’d take you up on the offer. I’d like to see the Astros’ response to the Sapp family claims because I surely hope that’s not precisely how it played out.
by The Advocate on May 7, 2010 11:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
There are also 29 other major league teams and even more independent teams he can go play for. The Astros have no obligation to this kid, and is it really fair for them to hold a spot for him in the minor leagues when there is another young kid out there looking for his opportunity.
by Timothy De Block on May 8, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions
That’s a fair point. But I think his concern relates to the supposed misrepresentation by the Astros. And we don’t really have both sides of that story. Maybe the Astros made a representation about taking him back which presumed he might return to athletic activities early than the time line turned out…who knows?
Berkman and Lee
Not a Carlos Lee fan, but his performance throughout his Astros career has been entirely in line with what a person would have predicted when he was signed. He has hit steadily for three seasons, played a poor left field and now has reached the falloff stage. It’s going to be expensive, but the Astros offered the contract. I don’t like the player and didn’t like the signing, but there’s really not much to be done about it.
As far as I can tell, Berkman was saying he might be able to help the team more as a trade offering than by actually playing for the team, and under those circumstances he would consider making himself available for trade. He’s right about that, and I absolutely defend him for saying it.
Outside observers like to criticize players for two things: wanting to play for a winner instead of the town team, and wanting to play in a particular place even if they don’t win. You’ll recall Fred McGriff got hammered in the media a few years ago when he declined to be rented out to the Cubs for a few months to stay in Tampa Bay.
I’d hate to lose Berkman, but he’s been a great Astro, productive and interesting and seemingly a good guy. If he took one last one for the team to speed up the rebuilding process, I’d admire him for it.
http://houstonastros.wordpress.com
Oswalt has always represented the team well.
Been a while since I posted.
I’m almost 40 and I’ll never give up on this team after over 30 years of fanship.
I want to bring up something that will soon be in discussion- Mills.
I don’t see him making it through the season, maybe not through the break.
May I ask why?
Just curious. It seems to me like most outlets and analysts give Mills a pass due to the cards he was dealt. I haven’t seen a lot of commentary on poor coaching or decision-making so I’m just wondering what leads you to think that his days are numbered.
by dallastros_fan on May 9, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I don’t have a “dis-like” per say of Mills. Although I don’t think being in the WS was an expectation of the season starting out, most would be inclined to believe that .300 winning percentage would not have been expected. If it’s still .300 at the break, could you see him staying?
No, I don’t see it happening. I can’t think of any examples of a manager getting fired in his first season. Plus, apparently McLane loves Mills and has a lot of faith in him. McLane said something like Mills is the best manager hiring he ever made. I just don’t see McLane reversing himself that quickly, no matter what happens.
When your 3,4,5,6,7 and 8 hitters are struggling to his .200, I don’t think you can toss too much blame on the manager.
by seanbergmanrules on May 10, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions
There are probably very few Astro fans that will feel bad for Sapp. He was a huge bust. To my understanding he was not very professional in his work habbits or training. Anyone that doesn’t fully utilize their skills makes me feel sad and a little upset. I dont know him by any means and I am glad he has recovered though. If he wants to play there are tons of indy-leagues. They didn’t owe him IMO.
My first mistake was assuming you knew what I was talking about.

by 























