What was THE moment you knew the Astros were headed towards disaster?
There are moments in my life I will never forget. One of those moments is watching Orlando Palmerio get thrown out at first base to end Game Four of the 2005 World Series. I watched the game with Evan, and few other bandwagon-y college friends, in Evan's apartment. As crushing as the moment was, Evan and I began to talk about next year within ten to twenty minutes (every baseball fan's perennial best friend).
You all know the story from there; it is not pretty. Aside from 2006 and 2008, sub .500 has been the name of the game. Even in 2006 and 2008, I spent large stretches of the season contemplating what the Astros needed to do to right the ship in their next season.
I recently have spent the last month under a rock. The last substantive piece of Astros news I have tried to really think through is the Paulino trade. Other than that, my energies and focus have been elsewhere. In lieu of dissecting relative Astros news, the part of my brian that has been conditioned to contemplate the Astros had to compensate. Its compensation has been tracing back my Astros thinking to the moment it became apparent to me that things were headed to a five to seven year stretch of near, if not below, mediocrity.
I have tried this thought experiment several ways. I have started from Orlando Palmerio's pinch hit at bat and moved forward. I have started from Felipe Paulino's trade and moved backwards. I have plotted out the major signings, trades, and drafts of the last few years. None, of it though, has taken me to a moment, game, personel move, etc. where something clicked in my head and I knew that things were going to get much worse before they got better.
The closest I have come is April and May of 2007 when Hunter Pence was setting the PCL on fire and Chris Burke was playing below replacement level baseball. The Astros front office kept reiterating that it was about rewarding veteran experience, etc. It's the first time I can remember prophesying doom. But I am not sure that is really when it clicked for me. It might have been that year's draft. But even still I think I kept clinging to the feeling I had in October in 2005.
The moment where I think I finally was ready to view the bleakness of the Astros current and future state probably came in the Winter of 2008, when Ty Wigginton was non-tendered. There was something about the absurdity of then being forced to call on Geoff Blum's services to save $4 million because there was likely no relief coming from the farm system that made it fully click with me—the Astros were screwed.
I doubt that is it, either. But I'll keep working at it.
I know that this is kind of a depressing topic. And I know that the last two days have been about Christmas spirit and hopeful wishes. I'm sorry to crash that party. But until I get myself fully briefed and focused on the Astros, I'll likely following this mental rabbit trial. Instead of making this a solo trip, I wanted to see what moment, personel move, etc. everyone else points to.
Hopefully tomorrow there will be something less morose to discuss.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For me it was when Andy Pettitte decided to bail for the Yankess. I had really hoped the Astros would sign him, but I think he saw the writing on the wall and wanted to go back to a winning club. Once he left you knew Clemens wasn’t coming back.
Probably the worst of that though was that the Astros replaced them with soon to be 40 Woody Williams. If the Astros weren’t going make the playoffs in 2006 with Pettitte and Clemens they weren’t going to make in 2007 with Carlos Lee and Woody Williams.
by Timothy De Block on Dec 23, 2010 7:09 AM CST reply actions
For me it was the Hampton, Ortiz starting pitching era. It seemed like two years in a row, the headlines were “the Astros have a chance, if everything goes right…” That’s when it sunk in for me.
Come to think of it…that’s still the message that is getting sold today.
by StaffSgtStrosFan on Dec 23, 2010 8:45 AM CST reply actions
Mine is similar to Stephen’s. November/December 2008. Wade withdraws a contract offer to Randy Wolf because Drayton reduced his payroll. Then he non-tenders Wigginton for payroll reason. That is followed by the replacement signing of Aaron Boone. The idea that the 3d base starters would be a platoon of Boone and Blum seemed utterly ridiculous. At the time, I wondered if Wade, chafing at the payroll reduction decision, had decided to play a joke on McLane.
I was working between
the Jennings trade (which along with the Woody Williams pickup, and to a degree, Carlos Lee’s big contract – maybe the entire botched offseason), which seemed like one desperate push to move a mediocre team back into the playoffs in a mediocre division; the baffling Wigginton (producing a largely abysmal third base situation for the past two years) and Wolf (he was either coming back at a reasonable price, or getting at least a supp draft pick) non-moves – which happened when they were still supposedly capable of contending, after a 86-win season ruined only by that hurricane; and the Tejada deal, which really angered me because even though it didn’t turn out all too badly (Patton flamed out – maybe Wade knew something, Albers and Sarfate are mediocre, Costanzo flamed out, Scott has been decent but probably superfluous), it signalled a pretty baffling organizational philosophy which hopefully has stopped, of trying to build a temporary, winning team from a very mediocre base, and limited resources.
Remember to retire Fin's number, Mark.
"I've had people walk out on me before, but not when I was being so charming."
I don't think it was just one moment...
but rather the culmination of events since the end of 2005.
Some that come to mind…
1) The exit of Jerry Hunsicker in 2004 who was, essentially, responsible for much of the great Astros teams over the 90s and 2000s.
1) Jason Lane and Morgan Ensberg (two big contributors of the 2005 team) going from being useful to pretty much useless over a two year period. When both players were traded in late 2007 it was shocking how far both players had degraded, talent-wise.
2) Bad signings and trades during the short-lived Tim Purpura-era. Just a few that come to mind: Woody Williams, Jason Jennings, Carlos Lee, and Aubrey Huff (for Ben Zobrist).
3) The Astros not signing any top picks in the 2007 draft.
4) Other high-valued draft picks not able to contribute to the big club between 2005 to present due to general ineffectivness (Chris Burke, J.R. Towles) or injuries (Brian Bogusevic, Felipe Paulino, Max Sapp).
5) The arrival of Ed Wade and the flurry of post-season moves in 2007. From sending half the farm to Baltimore (the day before the Mitchell report!) for Miguel Tejada (a guy in the Mitchell report!), to the Kaz Matsui signing, to the Brad Lidge trade—among others.
5) The rediculously bad start of the 2009 season and the whole Shawn Chacon debacle.
I believe
When we let Tejada go saying our future run production was to be turned over to the future at SS Tommy Manzella. How could a .270 hitter in the minors replace a .300 hitter at the majors? I got this sick feeling looking at our left side of the infield. Then of course the back to back 8 game losing streaks didn’t help.
by Its Gonna Happen on Dec 23, 2010 10:21 AM CST via mobile reply actions
2006 last day of regular season
Overcoming an 8 1/2 game deficit late in the season only to lose to the Braves on the final day thus missing the playoffs. I was heartbroken and very deep down inside I felt that was the last stand for this great team. The subsequent attrocious offseason just cemented that feeling.
"Welcome to the show where everything is made up and the points don't matter. That's right, the points are just like the Texans' defense" - Bring Whose Line back!
I'll also never forget
How incredulous I felt watching Berkman meekly fly out to end that game. It didn’t seem possible that the Astros would fail after having had so much break their way the previous two weeks.
The Crawfishboxes
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by Stephen Higdon on Dec 23, 2010 3:44 PM CST up reply actions
The moment when I knew we were firmly entrenched in mediocrity or worse...
Mediocrity? Yes.
Disaster, though, is what happens when .500 ball is something you look forward to… we’re not there… at least, not yet.
But that is my fear that we will inadvertently replicate Richard Justice’s pollyanna column from today, as-if we should take joy in seeing young enthusiastic players rather than winning baseball.
The moment I knew we were destined for mediocrity, though?
In all honesty, not until the 2009/10 off-season, when it first became evident that the organization was content to start, not one, but two young players (Manzella and Towles) at two positions, SS and C, who would have started for virtually no other team in either league given their resume’s. When a team is that desperate for a winning lottery ticket, you know mediocrity is the best you can hope for.
The last day of the 2006 season sticks out to me as well RocketsAstros. It was the last comeback and if memory serves Pettite pitched the second to last game and then we lost the last one. It was definitely the last time we were a championship contender.
Then of course switching from Andy Pettite to Woody Williams was a big decline. And seeing Biggio hit his 3,000 hit seemed like the end of the Killer Bee’s. The 2008 struck me as an over-achiever but, they were a winner.
Really we have been rebuliding since 2006. My guess is we are four to five years away from seriously competing for a play spot.
Pettitte
The Pettitte thing is a hot button with me.
There is no debate that Purpura was not an effective GM. And who doesn’t like Andy Pettitte? The guy is a winner.
However, Pettitte’s refusal to make up his mind and allow Tim and Tal to go to the Winter Meetings knowing exactly what ought to be on their pitching shopping list was/is a black mark on Pettitte and no one else.
Good to see he’s an equal-opportunity-offender, and that even the Yankees are getting the treatment. If Cashman does acquire someone, it will be interesting to see if Pettitte is as offended as he evidently was that Purpura dealt for Jennings.
Purpura botched that straight away
I was initially angry at Pettitte, who seemed to be flip-flopping between playing and retiring, but his comments afterwards seemed to suggest that if the Astros had made him feel wanted, he would have signed there.
Maybe two years $24m wasn’t unreasonable, but Purpura was obviously worried for some reason about Andy’s injury in 2004.
That was one of a succession of dumb moves, the second being not offering him arbitration, and then signing Woody Williams before the Padres decided whether or not to offer him arbitration, guaranteeing them our draft pick. Jason Jennings, sigh.
I've been trying to hold out hope..
for a long while now…
But after the whole Berkman incident, i don’t feel that anything good will happen in the near future (year or so)
And apparently Colorado is the team that's most serious....
which was reported a few weeks ago. I wonder what we can get in return.
Not sure just when
But around 2006 the farm system started to crater. Someone in the front office decided not to invest in signing and developing young players and the decline has been steady ever since.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
For me
It was two things at once. First, having Roger Clemens pitch the first game of the World Series. I was amazed they didn’t have Oswalt start that. The second, was announcing that Jeff Bagwell would be the DH. I loved Bagwell. He was great. But his career was obviously over and they had no business at all putting him in to play. Those were “cosmetic” decisions and I knew it then we were headed for disaster.
Using 20/20 hindsight
I see those things now. At the time, I did not possess the objectivity to rationally appraise those moves. I wish I did, though.
The Crawfishboxes
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by Stephen Higdon on Dec 23, 2010 9:12 PM CST up reply actions
Oswalt was forced (by Pujols and Lidge) to pitch Game 7 of the NLCS. I think that was the reason Oswalt was unavailable for the opening of the World Series.
I had similar concerns that DH-ing Bagwell was not a baseball move. However, he did get a key game tying hit in the WS, as I recall. As it turns out, McLane would have had less trouble (and probably gotten more money) from his insurance on Bagwell if that decision hadn’t been made.
Oswalt had pitched game 6 against the Cardinals and would not have been on normal rest. It was Clemens spot in the rotation. Oswalt wasn’t ready until game 3.
Let’s not forget that that team largely got unlucky they easily could have won all four of the games they lost especially games two, three, and four. At the time it was the lowest margin run difference of a sweep.
From a bench of Jose Vizcaino, Chris Burke, Jeff Bagwell, Orlando Palmeiro, and Mike Lamb. Bagwell was the best option even in 2005 Bagwell had a higher OBP of .350 to Lamb’s .284. It was not a cosmetic decision. Burke was not a DH. Vizcaino and Palmeiro were pinch hitting specialists and Lamb was the reserve power.
Am I the only one still angry we couldn’t close Minute Maid Park? It was Bud Selig’s decision somehow.
Oh
I will always be incensed by that.
The Crawfishboxes
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by Stephen Higdon on Dec 24, 2010 11:19 AM CST up reply actions
Bagwell WAS a cosmetic decision
Burke was not a DH I agree. But he should have been in the outfield and Lance should have been DH, with Lamb playing 1st. Bagwell only had one hit period, and while it was a key hit in that particular game, you could look at his swings and tell his shoulder wasn’t ready to be played on.
Oswalt was’t on normal rest also I agree, but he pitched on short rest plenty of times and I believe got himself a bulldozer once for doing it. Imagine if Drayton had promised him a back-hoe?
Checking the dates now that I've already posted...
Oswalt pitched on October 19th for game 6 vrs the Cardinals. The first game of the 2005 WS was on the 22 so he would have gone on three days rest if he had pitched the first WS game.
Carlos Lee signing
That one killed me. I posted a drunken rant on myspace when it happened. My first reaction was these guys don’t get it.
by MadMartygan on Dec 23, 2010 9:30 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Interesting question
I think you have to start with Gerry Hunsicker bailing. That was a clear red flag that something bad was going on in the Astros’ front office. Obviously, we can see there was a power struggle between Gerry, McLane, and Tal Smith.
Losing Pettitte was the beginning of the end for me. I was shocked we couldn’t find a way to re-sign him, and I was personally disappointed since I’m from his home town (Deer Park). The dominoes fell from there. Purpura tried to replace him with Jason Jennings, and the Woody Williams and Preston Wilson signings were also busts.
by goingforthecorner on Dec 23, 2010 9:59 PM CST reply actions
The Wilson signing was for the 2006 season, when Pettitte was still pitching, by the way.
A lot of people have mentioned the 2007 period, and I have stated previously that the 2007 season was devastating to this team: a confluence of events, like signing Lee and Williams, refusing to sign Pettitte and replacing him with Jennings, refusing to give arbitration in order to pick up a slew of high draft picks, and failing to sign the draft picks that the team had. I saw those as terrible decisions at the time, but I still held out hope that the team would find a way to dig out of the hole.
I echo that reaction
I kept tallying the “WTF?” decisions, but felt confident that the Astros would find away to balance it out. I couldn’t put the pieces together to see the full picture of just how devastating it was all going to be.
The Crawfishboxes
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by Stephen Higdon on Dec 24, 2010 11:04 AM CST up reply actions
Another problems is that they got use to living dangerously. 04 and 05 were not fluke teams but, the had so many old parts I think the front office came to believe that a 36-10 finish was always just right around the corner and so players like Lee or Jennings were added because it plausibly lead the team to repeat.
It was earlier this year when I really startign taking a long look at the farm system and realized just how bare the upper levels were. I had previously no idea how important building from within was and just how horrible the ‘05-’07 drafts were. 2006 started a brutal descent.
2006 the big team had a winning record but was not a playoff team. The draft was well below average (producing only Norris and Chris Johnson).
2007 sucked and was the first sign that many of the players we were hoping would form the core of the next good team (Burke, Ensberg, Everett, Lane) were not going to take the next step. Chris Burke not panning out was a huge blow to the franchise. Between the performance of the big club and the horrendous draft, 2007 was probably one of the worst years in franchise history and a big reason the rebuilding effort is just starting.
2008 returned the team to a winning record, but they still did not make the playoffs. Hopefully this will mark the trough, as the ’08 draft was very good and that year marked a renewed committment to building from within.
2009 marked a return to losing and undeniable evidence that the run was over.
2010 will hopefully prove to be the year that management began the process of building a winner. I think 2011 will see a near-.500 team and in 2012 forward the farm will start producing a high caliber of player. A LOT depends on teh new owner, but if payroll provides enough to keep the homegrown stars and fill in teh blanks, a return to the 2005 heyday could be coming.

by 

























