Hunter Pence, Astros channel their inner Fergie, meet halfway to avoid arbitration
I got a song (or two) in my heart this afternoon, I can't helps it! Maybe the songs aren't good ones, but still...
Alyson Footer tweets that Hunter and the Astros have (if you couldn't tell yet) met halfway between each side's offers and agreed on a 1 yr/$3.5 million contract for this season. Outside of this being extremely reasonable for a player who is 26, only getting better, and a fan favorite, the avoidance of arbitration is a good beacon for future negotiations, in my opinion. I don't know for certain if Pence would have held an arbitration hearing against the Astros, but it couldn't have been much of a good thing for the two sides to have to let a neutral decide Pence's value. Compromise was the name of the game.
I wrote about Hunter, arbitration and his free agent value in a post earlier in the week, so I don't have much more to offer on the subject. There are, of course, advantages to not signing Pence to a multi year deal, including the fact that we just don't know what kind of player Pence will become. With promising outfield talent in the lower levels of the minor leagues, Hunter's role may be to remain a relatively cheap, solid to good outfielder until youngsters like TJ Steele, Jay Austin, Jon Gaston, or even JD Martinez are ready to contribute for the Astros.
This signing leaves Wandy Rodriguez and Tim Byrdak as the remaining two Astros who are arbitration eligible and have yet to have agreed to a 2010 contract with the team. If Wandy can approach his 2009 statistics this season, he may want to hold off on agreeing to any multi year extension this offseason. As for Byrdak, he is expendable and his skills are replaceable.
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
Good Deal
I think is a huge year for both Pence and Bourn to show that they’re either progressing and will be solid contributors for this club for a long time to come, or the year they show they’re merely going to be average (or even slightly above average) players that will have to be replaced in a few seasons.
by Sarcastros on Jan 23, 2010 4:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I would definitely agree
This is basically strike one of four for us signing Hunter long term since hes a “Super Two” player. Its always good to take strike one. Well thats probably why I was such a horrible hitter. Economically, this is a good deal. God forbid Hunter falls off the edge, we dont want to owe him tons of money based on what we thought at the time he would be worth. I say once another big contract comes off the books whether its Berkman or Oswalt, he gets his one big deal. Just don’t sign Wandy long term. Hunter likes it here. He’s from Texas and I dont see the Rangers forking him over 40 plus million in a free agent contract 3 years from now.
by SteveBartman_MVP on Jan 23, 2010 5:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















