Felipe Paulino and HRs....what to expect in the future.
This season, Astros' fans thoughts have begun to shift to next year, and the future after that. Two important pieces for the Astros puzzle are young starting pitchers Bud Norris and Felipe Paulino. Both are hard throwers, and have shown flashes of domination in some games. In this article, I will take a quick look at Paulino's HRs this year. Paulino's 19 HRs allowed has been one of his biggest weaknesses.
Although Paulino's ERA and FIP (fielding independent pitching) are both significantly higher this year than what Norris has posted, that picture changes if we look at x-FIP, which is FIP adjusted for normalized HRs (i.e., league average HRs per flyball).
x-FIP
Norris 4.47
Paulino 4.07
The theory behind x-FIP is that pitchers have limited control over HR rates per flyball. Certainly, pitchers can control their HR/game rate by throwing more groundball pitches. But HR/flyball rates significantly higher than league average may be more affected by luck, and should be viewed more skeptically. Paulino's 18.7% rate is significantly higher than the typical rate of 11% - 12% per flyball. Paulino's x-FIP would represent an above average starting pitcher. Notice I said that a high HR/fly rate should be viewed with skepticism, but I didn't say it fully absolves the pitcher's performance. Presumably, a pitcher's command or stuff may be so bad, for example, that it could lead batters to just plain hit the ball harder and farther.
Looking at hit tracker, we see some support for the notion that Paulino's high HR/fly rate may reflect some randomness. In terms of HR distance, Paulino has 5 "just enoughs" (HR barely cleared wall) and 2 "lucky HRs" (wouldn't be a HR under normal conditions). Without those HRs, the remaining HRs would put Paulino very close to the typical rate of 11 - 12%, and the 4.07 FIP shown above. The average standard distance of HRs allowed by Paulino (393.7 ft.) is around the median for pitchers who allowed 18 or more HRs.
Another important element of Paulino's vulnerability to the HR this year is his difficulty with lefthanded batters. Lefthanded batters are 2.5 times more likely to hit a HR off Paulino than righthanded batters (2.8 HRs/PA for RHB vs. 7.1 HRs/PA for LHB). Paulino's problems with LHB extended beyond HRs---LHBs had a .409 OBP compared to .340 for RHBs.
So, here are some quick thoughts about potential improvement for Paulino next year. First, Paulino may well see a regression to mean in his HR rate, which will significantly improve his pitching results next year. Second, Paulino should work on improving his ability to get LHBs out. Perhaps he needs to work on another pitch which will be effective gainst lefthanders. Third, an improvement in Paulino's groundball rate would also decrease his HR vulnerability. Jim Deshaies has suggested that Paulino should work on an effective sinker, which would have the effect of improving the groundball rate. The downside to throwing more 2 seam fastballs is that Paulino's average velocity likely would decline, as well as potentially decreasing his strikeout rate. I wouldn't say that Paulino should change his basic style and become a "pitch to contact" pitcher, but careful use of a sinking fastball, particularly to LHBs, wouldn't hurt.
In the end, though, I remain optimistic about Paulino's future.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
A little decline in his velocity wouldn't be so bad
When you’re talking about a pitcher who fairly often hits 98MPH on his fastball and sometimes 99, losing 2-3 MPH is not a big deal. He could still use the four-seamer as an occasional strikeout pitch, and in fact I suspect it would be more effective at striking batters out if he established a sinker first.
Of course, this is all contingent upon him being able to learn a sinker. If only we had Dave Duncan for a pitching coach, huh?
The most important thing for Felipe is that he improve his command. Again, it may just be a matter of him being willing to sacrifice some velocity the way Bud does. Norris is also capable of reaching 98-99MPH on his fastball, but he rarely throws it that hard because he’d rather locate it a few MPH slower.
by OremLK on Sep 25, 2009 12:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The first thing to keep in mind is that, even if he does nothing (in terms of adding pitches, changing approach, etc.), the odds are that he will improve significantly due to regression to mean. Paulino’s BABIP is due for regression, and as I’ve pointed out in this article, he has been very unlucky in giving up HRs. Nothing’s guaranteed, but as far as sabermetric indicators go, Paulino is a pretty good bet to improve.
I don’t think it’s a good idea to change Paulino’s basic power pitcher style. In fact, probably what he can use most is better command of his breaking pitchers. Paulino’s breaking pitches are very good, and give him the big outs on his Ks. He can pitch well with a 4 seam FB if hitters know he can gets strikes with his breaking pitches. However, a 2 seam sinking FB wouldn’t hurt, and would probably complement his rising FB, particularly if it can help him cut down on damage from LHBs. I think Paulino has a 2 seam sinking FB in his arsenal, but he doesn’t use it enough. Perhaps he doesn’t have confidence in it.
by clack on Sep 25, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what you're saying is...
he’s a young player and just needs time and experience to see an improvement in his results? =P
by timmy_ on Sep 25, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and not
yanked around from bullpen to the starting rotation.
by timmy_ on Sep 25, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a big part of it.
It can’t help, if Paulino (or any young pitcher) feels like he is going to be judged on 1, 2, or 3 starts and sent back to RR or put in the bullpen if he gets bad results.
by clack on Sep 25, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The liberty of low expectations?
HOLY SHIT MIND BLOWN
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
by Only_A_Lad on Sep 26, 2009 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Update.....
This article at Fangraphs puts Derek Holland in the same statistical company as the rookie seasons of John Danks, Roger Clemens, and James Shields. The author, Dave Cameron, says that Holland (despite a 6.17 ERA) should be expected to take a big leap into elite status next year. Why? Due to his K/9, BB/9, and K/BB ratios.
So, let’s compare Paulino’s and Holland’s ratios:
K/9 DH 7.16 FP 8.73
BB/9 DH 3.12 FP 3.08
K/BB DH 2.21 FP 2.83
Cameron concludes that Holland’s ratios are “terrific numbers for a rookie starter with minimal high level minor league experience.” The same sentence can be applied to Paulino, who also has minimal high level minor league experience.
Cameron also makes a similar point (to my article about Paulino) that both Holland and Danks had rookie ERAs inflated by high HR/fly ratios which will subside in the 2d year. Cameron concludes:
For all the talk about some of the game’s most impressive young hurlers, Holland sholdn’t get lost in the discussion. Forget the amount of runs he’s given up – he’s shown enough to be considered a candidate for a huge step forward next year.
OK, that same statement should apply to Felipe Paulino too? Right?
Oh, I forgot, he plays for the Astros, and the Astros don’t have any young players worth a crap.
by clack on Sep 26, 2009 9:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The difference is Paulino is going to be 26 in a few weeks while Hollan is going to 23 in a few weeks. 3 years is a good difference as paulino is reaching his plateau in potential and Holland is just starting to reach to reach his potential.
Although, I agree paulino is going to have a much better season next year and definetly worthy of 4/5 rotation spot…maybe even a 3 spot. If paulino does settle in and his BABIP and HR/fly ratio get into the normal range, he develops a pitch for LHB or figures out a way to pitch better with what he has to LHB. He doesn’t use his changeup or curve very much at all. Maybe if he can really gain his confidence in those two pitches to use against Leftys. But really, it would help with facing all his batters because he’s throwing his FB nearly 60%. I think he needs to bring that down a little bit and work in his change a little more. Fangraphs is showing he threw a splitter a little in 07. They also show he’s thrown a Cutter and 2seam a few times. His 2seam is at 93mph so that really doesn’t hurt his power strike out type pitching so that really could help with his flyball rate too if works that in too next year.
by Subber10 on Sep 26, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, Paulino is 3 years older than Holland, and all else equal, I’ll take a younger pitcher over an older one. But, because Paulino has been dogged by injuries, he really isn’t a whole lot “older” than Holland, in terms of minor league innings pitched. Paulino has only pitched about 100 more innings in the minors than Holland. That means that Paulino is somewhat closer to Holland in terms of the pitching learning curve and mileage on his arm, so to speak. For a pitcher, I would argue that those factors are more important in terms of reaching a plateau or peak age.
by clack on Sep 26, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Breakout coming in 2010 for Paulino
We’re already seeing signs of Paulino’s breakout, based on what he’s done since he was recently reintroduced into the rotation over the last month or so. In the past, control has been somewhat of an issue, but since the A/S break he has a 34/10 K/BB ratio, which is right where you want that ratio to be. And more importantly, he’s posted a 9+ K/9 during that time, obviously showing that he has the stuff and capability to strike major leaguers out.
The comparison with Holland is interesting, but based on major league performance alone, Paulino’s numbers look even more promising. Holland has yet to show either the K/BB or K/9 ratios at the major league level that Paulino is currently posting. As for their age differences, keep in mind that Paulino has been hindered in recent years by injuries, which slowed his development. At this point his only real question about him is the not insignificant one of, Can he stay healthy?
Your discussion of his fluky HR rate, combined with his impressive command and K-rate, is just another indication that a healthy Paulino could be a beast next year. I am very excited about this kid, and positively drooling over the potential of a rotation of Oswalt, Wandy, Paulino, and Norris in 2010.
by TexStros on Sep 26, 2009 12:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs



















