Times tries to tie Tejada to old tip pitching claim
The NY Times carries an article which says that some of Miguel Tejada's old teammates in Oakland wondered if he was tipping pitches to Dominican friends. Tejada denies the claim, and ex-A's manager Art Howe defended Tejada. The 2001 A's supposedly had a team meeting to clear the air about the claims. But the article seems like an effort to paint Tejada with the same brush as the attacks on A-Rod. Johnny Damon, then an A, also defends Tejada, saying that it turned out that Tejada was a young shortstop who who would take a step too quickly in the direction he expected the ball. If anything, it sounds like some players may have had a xenophobic problem with distrusting Dominican players. The supposed evidence of Tejada pitch tipping is ludicrous....such as Tejada and an opposing Dominican player with the Jays hitting well in the same series. This is a serious charge and I think you need hard evidence to make it.
I refuse to believe that this goes on in MLB. I think the players are too competitive. I didn't believe the claims about A-Rod either. The claims are never supported by good evidence other than some teammates "wondering" about it. The Times cites a player "who has never seen it or heard about it" but insists it happens. This has the feeling of an urban myth.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He said the incident was "a one-time thing" and had never come up again. But he has since had well-documented trouble off the field.
Yes, because rumors of pitch-tipping are somehow related to lying to congress about HGH. That’s some great reporting there, NYT.
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
Yes, this is unusually shoddy reporting by the Times. The Times has gotten into some kind of competition with the NY Daily News in trying to bash players who are alleged to be steroids users. Innuendo and rumor are the order of the day. None of the facts about pitch tipping are anything close to compelling. Tejada made an error on an easy grounder? Oh, that is big time evidence there. Someone who thinks that means anything obviously hasn’t watched him play shortstop.
I would only disagree with you on one point
This is not particularly shoddy reporting by the Times. It’s become rather typical over the past few years.
“All the news that’s fit to print, plus a lot that isn’t.”
"Your most precious possessions on offense are your twenty-seven outs"
-Earl Weaver
I agree
It’s more about what’s going to move some papers or get some website hits. With newspapers struggling it’s not surprising that the integrity of journalism has degenerated.
by Timothy De Block on Aug 30, 2009 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions























