Rate your GM: The Astros under Ed Wade
With the signing of first round selection Jiovanni Mier completed, I felt like this was an undoubtedly positive step in the development of the Astros organization. So much of being an Astros fan of late has been about wondering what course this organization was going to take. Would it be a continuing path toward mediocrity- neglecting our farm system/player development, and emphasizing a "win now" philosophy highlighted by signing and trading for veteran talent? Or would the Astros realize the folly of their ways, and reinvigorate the base of their organization by investing more time, money and effort in the evaluation of talent and minor leagues in general?
When Ed Wade was hired as Astros GM September 21, 2007, a lot of people were skeptical. Sure, he had constructed the nucleus of the Philadelphia Phillies team that would win the World Series a year later, but a lot of his transactions weren't looked highly upon. As Astros GM, his first move was to trade Jason Lane for cash considerations. This wasn't a trade that did much to alter the perception of Wade around baseball. Lane was a remnant of our World Series club, someone whose talent had run its course. If anything, he should have been traded the year before.
The 2007-2008 offseason saw a flury of moves that dramatically altered the face of the team. Of course, the headliner was the trade that essentially sent Brad Lidge and Eric Bruntlett to Philadelphia for Michael Bourn and Geoff Geary. Since the trade, each player has had one good season. Lidge as we all know was perfect in save opportunities for the Phils last season, outproduced his contract by almost 50%, and was worth 2.2 wins above a replacement level player- a hefty margin for a relief pitcher. This season, a largely ineffective Lidge has suffered due to injury. Michael Bourn has gone from one of the worst regulars in baseball in 2008 to an offensive threat, who gets on base well, plays a solid centerfield, and is the Astros only true basestealing threat.
Following the Lidge/Bourn deal, Wade traded prospects and "role players" for established big leaguers. Oscar Villareal, Jose Valverde, Miguel Tejada and Randy Wolf all became Astros within a year of Wade becoming General Manager. Of those players, three of four would end up playing major roles in our almost/not quite/ill fated/Hurricane Ike damaged 2008 playoff push. Oscar Villareal (much like Geoff Geary this season) was ineffective to the point where the team demoted him to AAA. He was eventually released.
On the flip side, many of the players traded away- Josh Anderson, Matt Albers, Dennis Sarfate, Luke Scott, Juan Gutierrez and Chad Qualls have gone on to perform at least on a small time basis for their various clubs. The trade for Jose Valverde has always been a bit puzzling to me. True, having a big time closer is nice, but having his big salary is not. Qualls has been solid-good in his time in the desert, and Juan Gutierrez would surely be able to compete for a spot in our bullpen. Luke Scott has perhaps played above his head in 2009, but he has shown a penchant for getting on base, and is a player whose contract is modest. How does an outfield of Luke Scott-Michael Bourn-Hunter Pence grab any of you? Before you think, "Wow! Our defense sure would improve!", don't be so sure. I was fooled into thinking Scott would be a bigger upgrade defensively, too. Carlos Lee was someone Wade had no part in signing, and wasn't someone who could be dealt with (any) ease whatsoever. The corner outfield spots would be set for years to come, and with Bourn penciled in as our centerfielder of the future, Scott had no place on the Astros. He was a veteran who had reached his peak most likely.
The player that Luke Scott and co. were dangled to obtain, Miguel Tejada, was overpriced, aging and a shell of the player he was once. He was a guy the Astros had been targeting for a few seasons, and when the opportunity to get him arose, Wade took it. The Mitchell Report, his jump in age, and a rather mediocre season offensively didn't help the trade seem any better. His being on the Astros speaks to, again, the lack of any minor league talent at the AA or AAA level when Wade came on as GM. If a better, more cost effective option existed, this trade may never have happened. Hamstrung as he was, Wade did what he could to ensure the Astros wouldn't be without a shorstop that fit the Drayton McLane mentality of thinking about the present, and worrying about the future in the...well...future.
Since then, Jeff Fulchino, Wesley Wright, and LaTroy Hawkins were brought in and have been intergal parts of the Astros bullpen at one time or another. Ed Wade has been known to be a GM who emphasizes building a good bullpen, and while his results with the Astros have been mixed in my opinion, I would think that relief pitching has been closer a strength during the Wade administration rather than a weakness. Ivan Rodriguez, Mike Hampton and Russ Ortiz are well past their prime free agent acquisitions that have each played a part in keeping the Astros in the hunt this season. All were low risk acquisitions, and I don't think the Astros are where they are without them.
Perhaps the most important achievement of Ed Wade during his time in Houston has been the signing, promotion and influence of Asst. GM Bobby Heck. I realize that one person can't single handedly turn around a franchise, but Heck has come close. He has exerted his personality at the minor league level by bringing in his scouts, promoting players faster through our system, and most importantly signing draft picks. When in the past Drayton McLane wouldn't overpay a draft pick above his slotted price, last season saw the team do just that with Jason Castro. Castro came in and was immediately impressive, and is already in AA and playing well. Other highlights of the farm system include: the quintet of fine Lexington starters, Chia Jen Lo and his ascendancy from little known Taiwanese pitcher to legitimate major league prospect and the faith to draft Jason Castro as early as he did. Experts did not particularly like the Astros 2008 draft, but many if not all have changed their opinions since.
With help from a good personnel man, faith in young players, and trades that buoyed the Astros chances in a playoff push, Ed Wade has done much to improve the Astros during his tenure as GM. There were moves he made or didn't make that were head scratchers, but the structure of the team before Wade arrived influenced those decisions a great deal. Since he arrived though, the organization as a whole is stonger and better equipped to compete in the future.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
I voted B
I really like what has happened under Wade with the player scouting/drafting/development system. Bobby Heck, thus far, seems to be an excellent scouting director, and I like that we seem to be developing our international scouting presence. I like that Ricky Bennett has sped up the pace of moving players through the system. Also, at the lower levels, they seem to focus less on pitch counts (jumping on the Nolan bandwagon?) and instead are focusing on a pitcher’s actual performance and mechanics to decide when to pull him.
I also think that Wade has done a good job of pulling guys from the bargain bin. You mentioned Russ Ortiz, Mike Hampton, and Pudge Rodriguez as low-risk acquisitions. But Hawkins was a damn good bargain, too. Same with Randy Wolf. Chia-Jen Lo was a relatively inexpensive international signing after a less impressive Olympic performance. Wes Wright was a great Rule 5 pick. We pulled Alberto Arias off of waivers from Colorado, and Fulchino off of waivers from KC. Yorman Bazardo, another waiver grab, has been pretty killer down in Round Rock (even though I think it’s unsustainable). Even Tim Byrdak was a pretty decent signing.
Now, the primary thing keeping Wade from an A, in my opinion, is simply his trading. I didn’t like giving up Troy Patton in the Tejada Trade. Even though he got injured almost immediately, he’s recovering nicely and he’s still quite young. The Josh Anderson-Oscar Villareal trade would have been fine had it not been for the subsequent 2 year deal that Wade gave to Villareal (but hindsight is 20-20).
The other thing I took points off for was Wade’s bench construction. The bench is a weakness of the 2009 team, and I was used to it being a strength, with guys like Bruntlett and Loretta. It seems like an area that is not too expensive to upgrade, so there’s not much excuse in having a bad one.
On balance, I feel that Wade has made more good moves than mistakes, which, given that baseball is a crapshoot in many ways, is quite an accomplishment. I wish the team were younger, though. Who voted D?
by AstroAndy on Jun 25, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree
I couldn’t agree more with your analysis…Villareal is the main deal where I went “huh…not seeing that one”…Bourn/Lidge was a wash, both teams filled needs…Valverde was better than I thought he was, and picking up Ortiz & Hampton for nothing in the offseason made Backe not as critical…Matsui I agreed with when it was done, and that first week he looked great, but he just hasn’t produced like I thought he would…
Overall, as dead as this team was when he took over, I’ll go with a B as well…he improved the team, shook it up, and budget constraints tied his hands and he did the best he could within those constraints…
---AstrosFan (Austin Lawyer and Sports Fan)
I voted C
Imo, his work with the major league team is below average. He could have gotten more for Brutlett and Lidge than he did, and he didn’t have to give all those guys to Balt. for Tejeda. They were ready to dump him and we were the only takers. It seems in a lot of trades Wade comes out on the short end. I agree with you Andy also on the bench construction. We are really weak there. I give him a few points for cobbling together a pitching staff of cast offs and cast ways to keep us competitive on a budget.
Where he is above average is in the reconstruction of our farm system. Bobby Heck has done a great job getting that back up to speed in a hurry. I don’t really follow all those draft picks before draft day, however with Heck at the helm I feel very confident we are getting the players who will contribute at the Major League level sooner rather than later. If he had a lot of input for Cooper as manager, then I deduct additional points for that as well.
"now you chunkin' in there.."
Lidge trade...
If you recall Lidge was coming off a terrible year and the world was convinced his head wasn’t right. And a pitcher that tanks an entire year…well, consider the ’Stros record that year and how many saves he blew. In hindsight I think Michael B. was a good acquisition if this year is an indication of how he does in the future. Coop seems to think the boy will be a stud and time will tell. Long after Lidge is retired we might be looking at Bourn and saying, “dang, that was a steal…Lidge has talent but…”
As far as Baltimore goes…well, when we got him we didn’t know he was 52 and on roids lol…
Wanted to vote B- or C+
The only rason i like Wade is bcz. i love seeing activity with my team…unfortunatly i dont like much of the activity that he does…was no fan of Hampton coming back…i actually thought ortiz signing was good bcz its possible he could come back…didnt care for pudge signing…didnt like tejada deal (at the time i did)…
i feel like he overpays for players or takes to little in return…
Can’t Morey be GM for the stros too?
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jun 25, 2009 9:14 AM CDT reply actions
I voted B
Maybe I painted too rosy a picture of Wade’s time here in Houston, but I didn’t want to undersell the fact that he came into a team with an owner who had no clue, and a front office that wasn’t much better. That being said, he hired Heck, improved the farm system in only two seasons, and recently dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s on a new dominican facility. Sure, we gave up too much for Tejada, but none of those players were building blocks. They may have been cheap help for the bullpen, but I think Wade has done well in finding replacements. As AstroAndy noted, Troy Patton, if healthy, may be someone to keep an eye on.
I like Jano4’s point about the starting pitchers, and the job Wade has done. Wolf, Ortiz, Hampton, and Moehler have all contributed a great deal in the past 1.5 seasons. Without them, who would we have turned to? Fernando Nieve…oh, wait, nevermind. Seriously though, this team had nobody in AAA who could was a viable candidate for promotion the past few seasons, until now with Norris and to a lesser extent Bazardo.
by Evan Hochschild on Jun 25, 2009 9:18 AM CDT reply actions
I voted "C"
However, on my grading scale I consider “C” to be average. Overall, I think Wade has done about as well as the average ML GM would have done. To some that standard may seem better than average because they are judging by the previous GM, Tim Pupura, who was probably over his head in the job. Wade went out and got one of the better up and coming scouting cross checkers to be his director of player personnel, and I think that would be the kind of move an experienced GM would make. I think Wade has the connections within the major league community to identify Heck, and that is a plus for Wade.
Wade has his strengths and weaknesses, like most GMs (well, like most people in general). His two main weaknesses in my view are: (1) overly wedded to traditionalist views of offensive construction (more concerned about contact hitters than OBP); and (2) too much emphasis on acquiring his former players (in fairness, many GMs are like that). Some strengths, though: (1) good at finding cheap players and mining the re-treads; (2) probably has his own good sense of scouting; and (3) he isn’t afraid to make moves (didn’t this seem like a Pupura problem area?).
It’s hard to evaluate Wade’s trades because it’s too early for some (Lidge trade) and others may have been directed by McLane (I get the feeling that McLane wanted to acquire Tejada for a long time). And, actually even though I didn’t like the Tejada trade very well at the time, in retrospect, I don’t think it was a bad trade. The Astros traded one pitcher (Patton), who they knew had significant arm injuries (which were disclosed to the Orioles), two underperforming relievers, and a good 30 year outfielder who had no position to play in Houston as long as Lee is on the team. I like the Pudge signing; I think it was a cheap way to get a catcher who may not be great, but who is still a better offensive player than the Astros have had at the catcher position in 10 years. Wade’s worst move was trading for Villareal and compounding the mistake by giving him a 2 year contract.
we traded THREE pitchers and Luke Scott for Miguel Tejada.
Patton, Albers, Sarfate- one being an injured top prospect.
he is still recovering but is playing AA ball I believe…
I understand the need to trade a RF to make room for Bourn but trading 3 pitchers when we needed (and still need) pitching is not smart to me.
el caballo for el presidente
One pitcher wasn’t even a prospect (Sarfate). One pitcher was an underperformer (Albers), and also suffered arm injuries last year. And Patton had to undergo serious shoulder surgery after he went to the Orioles. At the time, I thought that losing Patton was significant, but I wasn’t aware that both the Astros and Orioles knew he had an arm injury. Patton is trying to make a recovery in the minors. But who knows if he is the same pitcher anymore, with the same velocity. In retrospect, none of these pitchers appear to be difference makers. Would any of these pitchers be capable of making the Astros ML roster? Probably not. Sarfate perhaps, since he is a decent reliever.
correction
I should have said, “Albers perhaps, since he is a decent reliever.”
Sarfate has been terrible as a reliever this year. Albers has been OK as a middle reliever.
I voted "C"
no mention of Matsui in this post?
I will admit that I am biased in that I loved Luke Scott but that trade had been for someone other than Miguel Tejada- someone young in their prime and not an alleged cheater- then I would have at least understood why the trade was made.
el caballo for el presidente
ehh
was matsui his signing…its possible he was…matsui just lowers his grade…
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jun 25, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
my bad
i did miss him…but matsui, to me, was a signing based on our dearth of farm system talent, and a testament to coors field…it wasn’t a great signing, true.
by Evan Hochschild on Jun 25, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Kaz
Kaz is a good player…I don’t care what anyone says, if his butt wasn’t bothering him so much he could have a Biggio without the power type of year…not Biggs in his prime, but a step or two down. He’s a good hitter with speed, if he were just healthy he could have a productive year.
Matsui was the best Free Agent candidate at the time
Our options, really, were to stick with Chris Burke or get a free agent. 2008 was a bad year for the 2B free agents, performance-wise…Luis Castillo, David Eckstein, and Tad Iguchi all had less success at the plate and actually played in fewer games than Matsui.
I don’t mind getting on Wade for the terms of the deal…three years seems a little too many. But the annual price was about the going rate for a FA 2B. And Matsui wasn’t even the worst deal that offseason…Luis Castillo’s 4 year $25 million contract was.
my biggest complaint about the Matsui contract was the added third season.
and that came about because Wade got into a bidding war with the Cubs over Kaz. Three years is a bigger risk than the Astros should have taken, but maybe we will get lucky and Kaz won’t crater next year. Kaz’s first season was good in terms of offense. Matsui’s OPS in 08 was even better than 07, when he played at Coors Field. This season, Matsui’s defense has been good, but his offense has slumped. If Matsui can improve his offense over the rest of the year, he could be a help. The Matsui signing wasn’t the best in the world, but he has provided some production, and his contract isn’t so big that it breaks the bank. So I don’t totally slam Wade.
The downside of the Matsui signing is that it seems to be blocking any playing time for Maysonet. But Cooper doesn’t seem to like playing Maysonet anyway, so we would probably see Kata if Matsui wasn’t around.
We had a guy by the name of MARK LORETTA
Please tell me why he would not have done just fine playing second and then we would have had more money to spend on pitching…
I voted C
His main accomplishment has been in getting Drayton to spend in player development. That’s a huge point in his favor, but it’s also something that isn’t too special.
Otherwise, he did well in trading for Hawkins and Wolf, has put together a pretty good bullpen, and probably did the best he could on the rotation with the limited resources he had.
Still, I think Tejada’s impending decline was obvious at the time, especially considering that everyone in baseball probably knew he wasn’t his listed age, given the he used his real age on government stuff (That was some tough investigative reporting, ESPN, btw).
I don’t think the Valverde trade was necessary (as much as I like Papa Grande), given Qualls’ ability. The Lidge trade probably was necessary, and Wade’s faith in Bourn is starting to pay off, but it would have been nice to get something more than Villareal.
The Matsui contract is awful, and everyone knew it was a bad idea at the time.
Moreover, other than the bullpen, Wade just hasn’t done a good job in roster construction. That’s why Darin Erstad is our first pinch-hitter and Jason Smith kept showing up over the past few months.
Overall, I think it kind of balances out. He’s done an okay job.
Your friendly neighborhood Dreamshake mod.
oh
and he gets a few points for comedy with the Chacon thing. (Can you believe it’s been one whole year?)
Your friendly neighborhood Dreamshake mod.
Whatever you think, add 1 or 2 letter grades
because Wade has to work in an impossible situation. We are lucky to have someone as good as Wade, when it is known throughout MLB that virtually no one wants to work or be a part of this team because of its overbearing owner.
"Your most precious possessions on offense are your twenty-seven outs"
-Earl Weaver
That Tejada trade really killed me
I was in disbelief when I found out it wasn’t just something like Scott-Sarfate-Albers for Tejada and the entire contract.
Apart from that, a fair job.
Remember to retire Fin's number, Mark.
I definitely voted B
Well, I was reading one of the Chron blogs the other day about Ed Wade, and they went over all his trades. Everyone’s quick to say we blew the Tejada trade. In all fairness, we didn’t completely blow it: we just gave up way too much.
Revisiting: we got Tejada for
1.) Luke Scott
2.) Matt Albers
3.) Troy Patton
4.) Adam Everett
5.) The minor leaguer from the Lidge/Bourne trade
We should have kept either Matt Albers or Troy Patton and the minor leaguer. Luke Scott wasn’t going to play because of Carlos Lee’s hulking contract in left (why can’t we make HIM our 3rd baseman?) so it comes down to a control specialist lefty who was on the verge of surgery or a righty who would at best be a middle rotation starter or swing reliever (maybe even a Chris Sampson guy).
Other than that, I can’t complain about the trades. No more trades involving our Ben Zobrists of the world.
Oh, where we may have been fleeced: Fernando Nieve.
B^2
"LeBron James is just an upgraded version of Ron Artest"
(Artest after Houston pummeled the Cavaliers 93-74)
Something which makes grading Wade hard...
is that he didn’t get to select his own manager. Most GMs have a hand in selecting a manager, and that becomes a big part of their influence on the team. Cooper was already in place when Wade came on board. It would be interesting to know who he would have picked for manager if he had been given that option.
Wade hired, and then fired, Francona in Philly. I think I have read that Wade admits he may have been mistaken to fire Francona. Francona gave a good recommendation for Wade to the Astros before Wade was hired. Wade then hired Bowa, who turned out to be a not-so-good idea.
I voted B
Mainly because I think that Wade inherited a deeply flawed organization and was given nearly and impossible mandate. The only thing I can really find fault for him with is the Matsui deal just because Matsui was not only a performance risk, but huge injury risk. I guess I can also fault him for extending Coop’s contract for no real reason.
Outside of that, I think that Wade has done an excellent job of trying to save face at the MLB while doing an outstanding job of ushering in totally different organizational philosophy in the farm system. In the short term, Wade probably won’t accomplish anything of note, but in the long run, I’m pretty sure we’ll all be singing his praises.
The Crawfishboxes
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
3B will make or break Ed Wade
If he promotes/finds a long time solution at 3B for the ‘stros; I will have a favorable view of him. As of today, it has not been long enough to grade a GM(21 months). A lot has changed – I am so happy that we got rid of Bruntlett, Burke and Everett. Those guys couldn’t hit for snit.
by Cactus Jack Sancho on Jun 25, 2009 10:57 PM CDT reply actions
unnoticed mistakes
Signing villareal.rushing jr towles.picking up cecil’s option early.Matsui deal.Tejada trade. Not resigning wolf or wigginton. Blum at third. josh anderson.
Some may say that he has done all he can with a poor farm system, but when he has gone out for players, no farm system is not an excuse. Michael Bourn’s trade is the only successful he has made because Geoff Geary gave us solid innings last year, and Michael Bourn has seemingly learned how to leadoff. The Matsui deal was terrible. He was injury-prone, and he was coming off of a SURPRISINGLY – good .285 season (.244 away from Coors). Then he sends away Josh Anderson for Oscar Villareal. Horrible trade. Then, the Tejada trade…still hard to come to a verdict. Inability to resign Randy Wolf, and a tough decision to not resign the overpriced Ty Wigginton were hard this offseason. Drew Sutton.

by 




























