Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Roy Oswalt, Russ Ortiz, and FIP

There are a lot of different statistics out there, and it can be tough to keep up with and understand them all.  One of the ones that I've looked at quite a bit without actually understanding how it works is Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP).  It belongs to a broader class of statistics known as Defense Independent Pitching Statistics that intend to show you how effective a pitcher has really been by using only numbers that don't depend on the defensive prowess of the other 8 guys in the field.  Simply comparing FIP and ERA is usually an interesting exercise, and can give you a good piece of information when you're evaluating a pitcher. 

What's even more interesting, though, is unpacking a guy's FIP, using it as a starting point for learning about what kind of a pitcher he is.

Star-divide

Going into Tuesday night's game, Russ Ortiz's was sitting pretty with a very nice 3.60 ERA.  Faced with the fact that he was basically a rehab project, it's totally legitimate to wonder whether this is the result of Ortiz being good, or whether it reflects outstanding defense on the part of his teammates.  His 4.50 FIP, almost a full point higher than his actual ERA, would suggest the latter.  

Roy Oswalt unfortunately has a FIP similar to Russ Ortiz--4.41 FIP.  And yet, this theoretical FIP doesn't stray too far from his actual results--4.48 ERA. 

Most of us, before the season started, would have predicted Oswalt to have the 3.60 ERA and Ortiz to be at 4.41 or higher.  What's going on here?    

First, we need to know what goes into calculating FIP.  Here's the formula:

We need four different numbers to calculate the stat in question:  home runs, walks, strikeouts and innings pitched.  I'll list those numbers for Roy and Russ in the table that follows.  Since Roy has pitched about 40 more innings than Russ, I'm also translating Russ's stats (xRuss) to see what they'd be like if he had pitched the same number of innings as Roy.


Russ O Roy O xRuss
IP 50 90 90
HR 4 13 7.2
BB 30 26 54
K 38 67 68.4

 

When you compare them across the same number of innings, the first thing that stands out is that Ortiz and Oswalt have been striking out opposing batters at nearly identical rates (Roy O and xRuss have 67 and 68.4 Ks, respectively). 

The big differences between the guys are in their walks and homers.  Ortiz has been walking guys at more than twice Roy's rate.  Roy, on the other hand, has given up over 3 times the number of home runs as Ortiz.  And since home runs are weighted more than 4 times as much as walks in the FIP formula (and in real life), it's no wonder that Roy's FIP is so much higher than Russ's.

If we look to how often a flyball goes for a home run when Roy is pitching, we see that this rate is not far off from last season's performance.  12.5% this year, 12.7% last year.  What's different is that Roy is giving up a lot more flyballs than he did last year.  37.3% this year, compared to 29.2% last year.  Roy is at his lowest groundball percentage perhaps of his career.  It seems reasonable to expect that Roy will be able to get the ball on the ground more often as the season progresses, and we should then see both his ERA and his FIP settle down into normal Roy levels.  

What about Ortiz, though?  Can we expect his FIP to come down to his ERA, or should we expect his ERA to come closer to meeting his FIP?  The high number of walks but relatively low ERA seems to fit in with the idea that Ortiz lives and dies on the corners of the plat and is more of a bend-but-don't-break kind of guy.

But it's really hard to say whether his current success is predictive of future success.  His career has had so many ups and downs that it's hard to compare his current season with past ones.  In fact, looking at his pitch types (thanks, Fangraphs), he's practically re-invented himself:

 



Fastball Slider Cutter Curve Change
2003 Braves 76.0% (89.5) 3.8% (81.9)   8.0% (79.1) 12.2% (82.2)
2004 Braves 67.6% (90.1) 8.6% (81.3) 0.1% (87.8) 7.7% (79.1) 16.0% (83.0)
2005 D-backs 68.4% (88.5) 9.6% (80.7) 0.8% (86.1) 9.9% (76.0) 11.2% (81.4)
2006 D-backs 65.2% (89.0) 9.9% (80.8) 3.3% (86.4) 11.4% (75.0) 10.2% (81.8)
2006 D-backs 63.6% (88.3) 5.3% (80.3) 3.1% (86.0) 14.0% (74.5) 14.0% (81.1)
2006 Orioles 66.3% (89.5) 12.7% (81.0) 3.5% (86.7) 9.7% (75.5) 7.8% (82.6)
2007 Giants 56.3% (89.7) 12.8% (82.1) 14.1% (88.5) 7.2% (75.3) 9.6% (82.4)
2009 Astros 49.4% (90.1) 2.8% (84.0) 15.9% (88.1) 20.1% (77.2) 11.8% (83.4)

 

He's using his fastball significantly less than at any point since 2003 (pitch type data doesn't span his whole career).  Conversely, his curveball makes up almost a full fifth of his repertoire, which is significantly more than at any point in his career.  Because of this major shift in his pitch selection, it seems really difficult to make predictions for Ortiz based on his pre-surgery career. 

Whatever he's doing, let's keep our fingers crossed that he's able to keep on doing it.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ortiz’s stuff looks pretty good. His curveball is a good pitch, if he can get it in for strikes. The most encouraging thing about Ortiz is that his fastball is in the low 90’s, and at time can peak in the mid-90’s. He throws both a sinking and rising FB. I wrote an article about the best run value pitches on the team, and it surprised me that Ortiz FB and curveball was second behind Wandy, among starters

It’s interesting to see the difference between Ortiz and Backe, post-TJ surgery. . But it appears that Ortiz’s velocity has returned to a greater degree than Backe’s. And Ortiz’s surgery was more significant, because he also had a tendon repaired.

by clack on Jun 23, 2009 11:40 PM CDT reply actions  

I remember you saying that Ortiz’s curve was a good pitch, I just didn’t realize he was using it so much.

As for Backe, he’s had some bad luck (22.7% HR/FB), but also some bad pitching as well. I wasn’t sure if the 2 mph drop in his FB really made him so much more hittable. I have no idea how to check this out, but my hypothesis is that he’s lost a lot of movement on his FB, making it easier for opposing hitters to just tee off on his pitches.

by AstroAndy on Jun 24, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Backe may have lost movement on his FB…I don’t know for sure on that. But my thinking is that Backe’s loss of velocity means that he has to become a different type of pitcher to succeed. Backe would have to make his style more like an Arroyo (plus breaking pitches) or Moehler (no walks with exact location). And he doesn’t seem to be that kind of pitcher. My reference to Arroyo and Moehler, of course, means the style that they use when they are successful, not that they are always successful.

by clack on Jun 24, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.

FanPosts

TCB Tweets!

    

Current Series

3 game series vs Rockies @ Minute Maid Park

Sat 04/07 6:05 PM CDT
Sun 04/08 1:05 PM CDT

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Chicago 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Cincinnati 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Houston 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Milwaukee 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
St. Louis 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0

(updated 2.16.2012 at 12:05 AM CST)


Managing Editors

Tcb_icon_small Timothy De Block

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

H_astros_small Subber10

Astrobritrs2_small AstroB

Small conroestro

Small native_astro

Small CRPerry13

Authors

Astros_logo121009_small OremLK

This-is-my-boom-stick_small allphilla

Th_houston-astros-logo-3_small Will Bonn