The Crawfish Boxes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

A look at the Astros Starting Pitchers using Hit/Fx: Friday food for thought

A seemingly valuable tool that I haven't seen get a lot of love since it came online in 2006 is Greg Rybarczyk's Hit Tracker Online.  The "How it Works Section" on the site is a mini refresher on physics and vectors, and while the system isn't flawless, it still can provide a lot of valuable insight into whether or not Home Runs hit were legitimate or not.

I know the HBT Fantasy Focus group has used to look at which hitters had legitimate power spikes or not, but I've seen relatively little on the impact of "Just Enough" HR and "Lucky" HR for pitchers.  Our starters struggles with the long ball in 2008 don't bare rehasing, so I'll get right down to it.

Star-divide

Before we delve into the numbers (don't worry, there's not more math in here than subtraction), here's a quick glossary of terms that will be utilized in the analysis and table:

Just Enough Home Runs (JE):

Means the ball cleared the fence by less than 10 vertical feet, OR that it landed less than one fence height past the fence. These are the ones that barely made it over the fence.

Lucky Home Runs(L):

A home run that would not have cleared the fence if it has been struck on a 70-degree, calm day.

The other two categories are Plenty (PL) and No Doubt (ND)...they're fairly self-explanatory given the above definitions.  With the exception of No Doubt HRs, there can also be JE/L and PL/L HR that involve atmospherics creating those opportunities.

Since I haven't seen a comprehensive study of what all the data means for pitchers, indulge me as we run through at table of how our starters from last year ended up in the JE, JE/L, L, and PL/L categories (with their actual HR totals and their HR/FB%), and then go out on a limb.

SP/Type JE JE/L PL/L

Brandon Backe

(36, 16.1%)

8 1 0

Roy Oswalt

(23, 12.7%)

5 1 1

Brian Moehler

(20, 11%)

5 2 0

Wandy Rodriguez

(14, 9.6%)

2 1 0

The limb: It might not be a good one, but I risk neutral.  Assuming that the Just Enough's could go either way 50% of the time and the Lucky HRs, just wouldn't have happened unless the planets aligned (or in the case this winds?), the adjusted HR totals for our pitchers would be as such (descending order):

  1. Brandon Backe: 31 HR
  2. Roy Oswalt: 18.5 HR
  3. Brian Moehler: 15.5 HR
  4. Wandy Rodriguez: 12 HR

Those are some pretty significant decreases that lady luck could have brought our way.  Except for Wandy, every pitcher had at least 1/4 of their home runs fall in a dubious category and this could be an indication that maybe 2009 will see lady luck be kinder too us.  The obvious caveat is that we don't have data about potential home runs that atmospherics robbed, but it's Spring Training and my glass is half full.  I think we can still take away from these numbers that Backe, Oswalt and Moehler saw a significant amount home runs come in iffy circumstances, and that perhaps they won't see as many trots around the basepaths while they grimace on the mound in 2009.

Hope Springs eternal...right?

0 recs  |  Comment 1 comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

does it split out the data by Home vs. Road, LF vs. RF?

You have made a good point. (And, certainly, Backe’s total was so high that it’s hard to imagine that the odds wouldn’t call for a reduced HR totat.)

But I am thinking about the Crawford Boxes and how it might affect the “odds” on Just Enough HRs (both on the hitter and pitcher side). From watching games, many HRs into the Crawford Boxes seem like “just enough.” But I would suggest that the odds of hitting a “just enough” HR 315 feet is greater than a “just enough” HR 350 feet in another ballpark. The piece you are missing on your assumption is how many HRs barely missed becoming a HR and assigning some luck percentage to them. My guess is that more balls might go 310 feet and be caught in LF than 345 foot balls caught in front of a 350 foot LF wall.

I’m not sure about this. But it seems like “just enough” HRs to the crawford boxes might be more repeatable than if they are hit to deep CF, for example.

by clack on Feb 27, 2009 7:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.
Start posting about the Astros »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Strotim_small
Position Battle: Catcher
Nsapcs13_large_small
MLB Guidelines for Opening/Closing Stadium Roofs
Small
Cardinals close to signing Felipe Lopez
Johns_small
Berkman and his contract
Small
Baseball America Interview: Jason Castro
Nsapcs13_large_small
More on minor league affiliation....
Small
What He Said, What He Meant
Img00034-20090811-1430_small
Quick question about Meyers, Lyon and Lindstrom
Muzzprof_small
Astros extend Wade's contract through 2012
Small
How bad will Carlos Lee's contract be going forward?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL

  

Picture_88_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Facebook

Current Series

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK

(updated 3.11.2010 at 10:45 AM CST)


Humble Blog Managers

Photo16_small Evan Hochschild

Lovelance_small Stephen Higdon

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

Fbod6_small farm_stros