The Crawfish Boxes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Astros' offense at 3d base and shortstop in the 2000's

Detroit Tigers shortstop Adam Everett dives for a single hit by Cleveland Indians' Matt LaPorta in the second inning in a baseball game, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2009, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

More photos » by Tony Dejak - AP

2 months ago: Detroit Tigers shortstop Adam Everett dives for a single hit by Cleveland Indians' Matt LaPorta in the second inning in a baseball game, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2009, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)


Let's look at what kind of offense the Astros have gotten from the left side of the infield in this decade.   This idea for this post came to mind after I commented on HLP's article about Tommy Manzella taking over the shortstop position next year, making that position defense-first, like it was in the Adam Everett era.  My comment pointed out that Everett generally was accompanied by a stronger offensive performance at 3d base than the Astros received last season.  As I cogitated, I realized that the Astros generally have had "either / or" offensive performance from shortstop and 3d base.  By that, I mean either the shortstop or 3d baseman is a good offensive player--but not both.  That may be by design, or perhaps just the way things turned out.

To examine this tendency, I used Baseball-Reference's OPS+ for the Astros' third base and shortstop positions for each year 2002 - 2009.  The stats are based on the offense of all the Astros hitters who played the position.   As most of you know, OPS+ is a park adjusted index relative to league wide OPS.  !00 is the base, with lessor and higher values reflecting above or below average OPS performance.  I also calculate an average for the two positions to get an idea of the combined offense from the two positions.

OPS+
 year 3d base shortstop average
02 122 91 107
03 110 89 100
04 99 93 96
05 140 77 109
06 101 75 88
07 82 95 89
08 85 105 95
09 76 116 96

 

Do you detect a pattern here?  Generally 3d base was the stronger offensive position until 2007 (when Everett suffered a season end broken flbula), when the Loretta - Bruntlett offense at shortstop was better than third base, where coincidently Ensberg's offense fell off a cliff.   With the trade for Tejada, the 2008 and 2009 shortstop position dominated offensively and the 3d base position became the weak offensive position.  The combined offense of shortstop and 3d base was decent through 2005, but the positions' combined offensive contribution fell off in 06 and 07.  Whatever faults one might see with the Tejada trade, the acquisition was successful in pushing the combined offense of shortstop and 3d base closer to the level which prevailed prior to 2006.

The only season in which the 3d base and shortstop were roughly the same in offense was 2004.  Mike Lamb and an injured Morgan Ensberg shared time at 3d base, combining for league average offense.  Adam Everett had his best offensive year, with a .706 OPS, but suffered a late season injury, and was replaced by Jose Vizcaino, who had a hot streak.

Star-divide

The best single seasons of combined offense were 2002 and 2005 (when the Astros went to the World Series).  The 2002 season featured one of Geoff Blum's best season (OPS of .807) and a decent offensive performance by Julio Lugo (.710 OPS).   The 2005 season featured an out-of-this-world offensive performance by Morgan Ensberg (.945 OPS), which more than made up for the first of several sluggish offensive seasons by Adam Everett (OPS of .653).   Both of the highest offensive seasons at shortstop were associated with Tejada's two seasons in 08 and 09.   Unfortunately, the Blum - Wigginton platoon in 2008 was only a slight improvement over the tumultuous 3d base situation in 2007.  The 3d base performance declined further in 2009 when Keppinger replaced Wigginton in the platoon.

If Manzella takes over 3d base in 2010, and the shortstop OPS+ returns to the Everett levels of 05 - 06--perhaps an OPS+ of 75-- then the combined OPS+ is likely to be the worst of the decade for the Astros---unless the Astros retain Tejada at 3d base or acquire another offensive upgrade at 3d base.   A return of the Blum - Keppinger platoon would likely put the combined OPS+ at 80 or lower, which would be even worse than the losing season of 2007, which cost manager Phil Garner his job.   Although one can hope for a breakthrough season by rookie Chris Johnson, the more likely scenario is that he would produce an OPS+ no higher than the Blum - Keppinger platoon.

In case you are wondering about the photograph for this article, that is Adam Everett of the Detroit Tigers.

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

i saw

that he and tejada were roughly the same player in terms of fangraphs’ value and WAR. add in that beltre is 31, and he should demand a nice contract. although, maybe he would take a one year contract with a NL club to boost his stats/value?

The Crawfish Boxes, Astros blogging at its finest.

by HighLeveragePerformer on Nov 8, 2009 6:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If we can then sure.

Say both cost the same exact amount then I actually wouldn’t know who to pick. Probably Beltre b/c I think he has more upside.

Tejada = better OBP, a little less power, good leader, questionable fielder
Beltre = subpar OBP, a little more power, not a huge leader, solid fielder

Some give and take. I’d be happy with either. I think I’d like Beltre just because of the upside and we likely aren’t gonna have to deal with as many issues in the press that Tejada sometimes brings. I know small but even though Miggy’s leadership is big it is somewhat diluted b/c of the negative attention he’s brought to the Stros at times.

by Astrosws20 on Nov 8, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

For what it’s worth, Fangraphs had an analysis a few weeks ago which concluded that Safeco Field had significantly suppressed Beltre’s power, because Safeco’s LF is not HR-friendly and Beltre’s HR power is to LF. The suggestion was made that Beltre could see his slugging stats return to LA Dodger days in a new ballpark. Of course, MMP has a very HR conducive LF.

by clack on Nov 8, 2009 9:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How about Wilson Betemit?

Okay I know he’s not a sexy name, but he’ll come relatively cheap, he has experience all over the infield, and could be decent. Granted he’s a lot like Keppinger and as I write this the more I realize how pointless a signing this would be but yeah just throwing it out there lol

by Astrosws20 on Nov 8, 2009 12:29 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

A couple of years ago, Wilson Betemit was one of my favorite suggestions for the Astros. But he keeps getting worse and worse, to the point that I doubt he has much of a major league future. A better candidate along the same lines is Andy Marte (who is the once uber-prospect for the Braves who forced them to trade Betemit). We talked about him at TCB after he was DFA’d last spring. After hitting bottom with that event, Marte rebounded strongly in AAA. Here is a fantasy fangraphs article about Marte at the mid-season point in 09. He was called up to the Indians after DeRosa was traded. He provided good defense, but his offensive numbers were mediocre in the majors in 09. Unless you want to bet on Marte eventually achieving his old uber-prospect predictions, I would say that Keppinger is probably a more reliable 3d base option.

I agree that Beltre is the best third base free agent, and I would like him as an Astros player. But I think he will be more costly than the Astros will pay. Mark DeRosa is a free agent who would improve offense at the position, but he isn’t a great defender at 3d base. Still, if he is available in the Astros’ price range, he would be worth some thought. Then we have the other suggestions we have talked about, ranging from 4A players (Heether) to the Kennedy, Lopez, Branyan tier of players.

by clack on Nov 8, 2009 8:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah not a fan of Marte. The Indians minor league 3B situation sounds a little bit like our minor league C situation with Marte being Towles and LaPorta being Castro.

by Astrosws20 on Nov 8, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Brewers add Heether to their 40 man roster.

Here is a link to Brewcrewball thread on the subject. Maybe Brewers felt like the Astros might take a flyer on him?

by clack on Nov 11, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

2009 vs 2010 the debate

when are we considering the end of this decade?

Personally I’m going with 2009.

by timmy_ on Nov 9, 2009 7:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think most people start with 2001, instead of 2000, and go to 2010, but I’m not sure. In any event, I was too lazy to go back as far as 2001…actually not lazy, but had trouble with the “table” tool. And gave up on 2001; it wouldn’t have made a difference in the conclusions.

by clack on Nov 9, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know I was just dropping the question for continuity sake for the coverage. So when someone says decade we all know it’s either 2001 – 2010 or 2000 – 2009.

by timmy_ on Nov 9, 2009 11:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.
Start posting about the Astros »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Rule 5 Draft: AL East - Hello, pitching!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Astros can remain competitive with reduced payroll
Small
Rule 5 Draft: AL Central - The Indians have a farm
Small
Astros need to show us they are trying to improve
Nsapcs13_large_small
Oakland A's dip into pool of 3d base minor league free agents
Small
Astros sign minor league FA Jose Valdez
Small
Astros Farm System Fixed?
Small
If we spend than Drayton will spend....Come on Justice.....what are you thinkin'??
Strotim_small
The most overexposed teams in the MLB
Nsapcs13_large_small
More on Minor League Free Agents

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL

Picture_88_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Facebook

Picture_89_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Twitter

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
St. Louis 91 71 .561 0 Lost 6
Chicago 83 78 .515 7.5 Lost 1
Milwaukee 80 82 .493 11 Won 3
Cincinnati 78 84 .481 13 Won 2
Houston 74 88 .456 17 Lost 3
Pittsburgh 62 99 .385 28.5 Lost 2

(updated 11.30.2009 at 3:32 AM CST)


Humble Blog Managers

Woodstock_small HighLeveragePerformer

Lovelance_small DyingQuail

Houston_astros_logo_small davoag

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

Fbod6_small farm_stros