Astros' offense at 3d base and shortstop in the 2000's
Let's look at what kind of offense the Astros have gotten from the left side of the infield in this decade. This idea for this post came to mind after I commented on HLP's article about Tommy Manzella taking over the shortstop position next year, making that position defense-first, like it was in the Adam Everett era. My comment pointed out that Everett generally was accompanied by a stronger offensive performance at 3d base than the Astros received last season. As I cogitated, I realized that the Astros generally have had "either / or" offensive performance from shortstop and 3d base. By that, I mean either the shortstop or 3d baseman is a good offensive player--but not both. That may be by design, or perhaps just the way things turned out.
To examine this tendency, I used Baseball-Reference's OPS+ for the Astros' third base and shortstop positions for each year 2002 - 2009. The stats are based on the offense of all the Astros hitters who played the position. As most of you know, OPS+ is a park adjusted index relative to league wide OPS. !00 is the base, with lessor and higher values reflecting above or below average OPS performance. I also calculate an average for the two positions to get an idea of the combined offense from the two positions.
| year | 3d base | shortstop | average |
| 02 | 122 | 91 | 107 |
| 03 | 110 | 89 | 100 |
| 04 | 99 | 93 | 96 |
| 05 | 140 | 77 | 109 |
| 06 | 101 | 75 | 88 |
| 07 | 82 | 95 | 89 |
| 08 | 85 | 105 | 95 |
| 09 | 76 | 116 | 96 |
Do you detect a pattern here? Generally 3d base was the stronger offensive position until 2007 (when Everett suffered a season end broken flbula), when the Loretta - Bruntlett offense at shortstop was better than third base, where coincidently Ensberg's offense fell off a cliff. With the trade for Tejada, the 2008 and 2009 shortstop position dominated offensively and the 3d base position became the weak offensive position. The combined offense of shortstop and 3d base was decent through 2005, but the positions' combined offensive contribution fell off in 06 and 07. Whatever faults one might see with the Tejada trade, the acquisition was successful in pushing the combined offense of shortstop and 3d base closer to the level which prevailed prior to 2006.
The only season in which the 3d base and shortstop were roughly the same in offense was 2004. Mike Lamb and an injured Morgan Ensberg shared time at 3d base, combining for league average offense. Adam Everett had his best offensive year, with a .706 OPS, but suffered a late season injury, and was replaced by Jose Vizcaino, who had a hot streak.
The best single seasons of combined offense were 2002 and 2005 (when the Astros went to the World Series). The 2002 season featured one of Geoff Blum's best season (OPS of .807) and a decent offensive performance by Julio Lugo (.710 OPS). The 2005 season featured an out-of-this-world offensive performance by Morgan Ensberg (.945 OPS), which more than made up for the first of several sluggish offensive seasons by Adam Everett (OPS of .653). Both of the highest offensive seasons at shortstop were associated with Tejada's two seasons in 08 and 09. Unfortunately, the Blum - Wigginton platoon in 2008 was only a slight improvement over the tumultuous 3d base situation in 2007. The 3d base performance declined further in 2009 when Keppinger replaced Wigginton in the platoon.
If Manzella takes over 3d base in 2010, and the shortstop OPS+ returns to the Everett levels of 05 - 06--perhaps an OPS+ of 75-- then the combined OPS+ is likely to be the worst of the decade for the Astros---unless the Astros retain Tejada at 3d base or acquire another offensive upgrade at 3d base. A return of the Blum - Keppinger platoon would likely put the combined OPS+ at 80 or lower, which would be even worse than the losing season of 2007, which cost manager Phil Garner his job. Although one can hope for a breakthrough season by rookie Chris Johnson, the more likely scenario is that he would produce an OPS+ no higher than the Blum - Keppinger platoon.
In case you are wondering about the photograph for this article, that is Adam Everett of the Detroit Tigers.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Adrian Beltre, anyone?
The Crawfish Boxes, Astros blogging at its finest.
by Evan Hochschild on Nov 7, 2009 10:53 PM CST reply actions
i saw
that he and tejada were roughly the same player in terms of fangraphs’ value and WAR. add in that beltre is 31, and he should demand a nice contract. although, maybe he would take a one year contract with a NL club to boost his stats/value?
The Crawfish Boxes, Astros blogging at its finest.
by Evan Hochschild on Nov 8, 2009 6:50 AM CST up reply actions
If we can then sure.
Say both cost the same exact amount then I actually wouldn’t know who to pick. Probably Beltre b/c I think he has more upside.
Tejada = better OBP, a little less power, good leader, questionable fielder
Beltre = subpar OBP, a little more power, not a huge leader, solid fielder
Some give and take. I’d be happy with either. I think I’d like Beltre just because of the upside and we likely aren’t gonna have to deal with as many issues in the press that Tejada sometimes brings. I know small but even though Miggy’s leadership is big it is somewhat diluted b/c of the negative attention he’s brought to the Stros at times.
For what it’s worth, Fangraphs had an analysis a few weeks ago which concluded that Safeco Field had significantly suppressed Beltre’s power, because Safeco’s LF is not HR-friendly and Beltre’s HR power is to LF. The suggestion was made that Beltre could see his slugging stats return to LA Dodger days in a new ballpark. Of course, MMP has a very HR conducive LF.
How about Wilson Betemit?
Okay I know he’s not a sexy name, but he’ll come relatively cheap, he has experience all over the infield, and could be decent. Granted he’s a lot like Keppinger and as I write this the more I realize how pointless a signing this would be but yeah just throwing it out there lol
A couple of years ago, Wilson Betemit was one of my favorite suggestions for the Astros. But he keeps getting worse and worse, to the point that I doubt he has much of a major league future. A better candidate along the same lines is Andy Marte (who is the once uber-prospect for the Braves who forced them to trade Betemit). We talked about him at TCB after he was DFA’d last spring. After hitting bottom with that event, Marte rebounded strongly in AAA. Here is a fantasy fangraphs article about Marte at the mid-season point in 09. He was called up to the Indians after DeRosa was traded. He provided good defense, but his offensive numbers were mediocre in the majors in 09. Unless you want to bet on Marte eventually achieving his old uber-prospect predictions, I would say that Keppinger is probably a more reliable 3d base option.
I agree that Beltre is the best third base free agent, and I would like him as an Astros player. But I think he will be more costly than the Astros will pay. Mark DeRosa is a free agent who would improve offense at the position, but he isn’t a great defender at 3d base. Still, if he is available in the Astros’ price range, he would be worth some thought. Then we have the other suggestions we have talked about, ranging from 4A players (Heether) to the Kennedy, Lopez, Branyan tier of players.
Brewers add Heether to their 40 man roster.
Here is a link to Brewcrewball thread on the subject. Maybe Brewers felt like the Astros might take a flyer on him?
2009 vs 2010 the debate
when are we considering the end of this decade?
Personally I’m going with 2009.
by Timothy De Block on Nov 9, 2009 7:53 AM CST reply actions
I think most people start with 2001, instead of 2000, and go to 2010, but I’m not sure. In any event, I was too lazy to go back as far as 2001…actually not lazy, but had trouble with the “table” tool. And gave up on 2001; it wouldn’t have made a difference in the conclusions.
I know I was just dropping the question for continuity sake for the coverage. So when someone says decade we all know it’s either 2001 – 2010 or 2000 – 2009.
by Timothy De Block on Nov 9, 2009 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
























