The Crawfish Boxes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

Random Friday Discussion Question

Did you know the World Series was going on right now??? Me either!

More photos » David J. Phillip - AP

Did you know the World Series was going on right now??? Me either!

It's Friday, the Astros have a new manager. The Yankees and Phillies are facing off in an East Coast World Series. What's going on in Astroville? Well, not a lot. We probably won't announce any new coaches until after the series is done, so let's create our own little discussion. I thought we could trot out a new baseball question each Friday and just have some fun with it.

First up, the box score. It was created by sportswriters back at the early part of the century, but hasn't really changed since. I love looking at them, I love creating them for the newspaper and I love how much information they pack into such a small space. The shame of it is, couldn't there be more useful stuff in there?

The one change I'll throw out there is this: instead of showing the number of ground ball outs and fly ball outs for each pitcher, why not list number of ground balls, number of line drives and number of fly balls. Not just outs, but all hits. How useful would that be?

What would you like to see in a 'new' box score? What would you get rid of? Is there any good way to get fielding data in there? Talk amongst yourselves...

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Unlike the manager selection, the MLB doesn’t prohibit the Astros from hiring coaches during the World Series. So, it’s always possible that it could happen during the World Series period.

As for box scores, I am disappointed that many newspapaers (including the local Austin American Statesman) have reduced the amount of information in box scores over the last couple of years (in order to conserve space). But, then again, I suppose most of us who are most interested in the box scores usually look at them on-line, where you can find the most complete versions.

by clack on Oct 30, 2009 7:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I actually would prefer it the other way where they get rid of some stats, but not for the sake of putting more ads in a news paper. For newspapers I’d keep it simple and avoid cluttering, I haven’t looked at a box score in a newspaper in a long time so I can’t say specifically what I would get rid of and what I would keep. I’d keep the statistics to the line of the players involved.

The box score online though throw as much on their as you want, because you can dedicate an entire web page to the box score.

by timmy_ on Oct 30, 2009 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s a discussion question…would you rather see OBP, instead of batting average on the player lines in the box score?

by clack on Oct 30, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boxscores at BaseballReference.com have a LOT more information....

I particularly like the addition of OPS as well as BA. It even includes WPA.

I pulled out the July 30, 1969 game at Shea Stadium, Astros vs. Mets in order to show the B-Ref boxscore. As I’ve mentioned here before, the 1969 season was special to me, because it was the first time that I closely followed the Astros’ season as a kid. It was also the first time that the Astros were truly in contention (10 games over .500 in the first week of Sept.). I also remember this July 30 game—-I listened on the radio, and insisted on staying in the car to listen to the game when my mother went into the supermarket for shopping. This was an exciting game, because it was really rare for that low scoring Astros team to score 16 runs. And it was against the eventual World Series champs, the Mets, and their No. 2 pitcher, Jerry Koosman. The 69 Mets were the “Miracle Mets,” but the Astros were kryptonite to those supermen of the Mets in 1969.

by clack on Oct 30, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

while I'm at it...

the game above was the first of a DH at Shea. The Astros also won the second game, 11-5, led by Larry Dierker’s HR and double off Nolan Ryan.

by clack on Oct 30, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That

is awesome

by Xan on Oct 30, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batting average

is like how many yards a running back get’s running the football, or catching the football. OBP would be like the combination of the two plus any returning yards they get. You don’t see total yards in the box score for football. What I like about the NFL boxscore is I get in and get out without a whole lot of clutter.

While I’d like to see OBP the problem is that it includes walks, and walks are boring. People aren’t checking the box score for how many walks a guy had, they’re looking for those exciting hits. A walk is the same as a single, but it’s more exciting to the fan to see a hit than a walk.

by timmy_ on Oct 30, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I check the box score for walks. Just sayin.

by AstroAndy on Oct 30, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do too, but the casual fan won’t.

I’m taking a newspaper pov from this, and what’s going to get me readers, and what’s going to have the readers keep coming back to that section.

by timmy_ on Oct 30, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

First, I’d like to see box scores use plate appearances instead of/in addition to AB. This would allow you to see how many times the opposing pitchers went through the lineup without having to go to the BB column and add it in.

I’d also like to see bunts/attempted bunts and infield hit numbers. Jeff Keppinger going 2-for-4 with hard-hit grounders up the middle is different from Kepp laying down a couple of bunts, but they are represented the same on the box scores.

I also think it could be informative to see contact vs. swing-and-miss numbers. One game would be a small sample size, but you could get a feel for whether the other team was seeing a particular pitcher well.

On the minor league team websites, in addition to the box score, they have a “Game Log” or a “Recap” that lays things out in narrative form. So instead of knowing just that a batter grounded out once in the game, you find out that he grounded out to the third baseman who made the throw to first base to make the final out of the third inning. This is way too much for a newspaper to print, but it’d be easy to post on a webpage (say, astros.com) instead of having to click around Gameday to get this info. When I check up on our minor leaguers, I usually look at the recaps to get a better feel for how well a player is hitting the ball or how efficient a pitcher is.

I don’t know how to improve fielder data in box scores, but if the Astros did the Game Log thing (like their minor league teams do), then they could indicate which plays Milo gave a blue star on. I don’t know if the blue star thing is a general scorekeeping convention, but I like to use it when I score a game.

by AstroAndy on Oct 30, 2009 9:59 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the Blue Star thing came up because someone found out they could attach a sponsorship to it.

by GatorTD on Oct 30, 2009 10:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Milo

I thought Milo had been doing the blue stars for a while, and then later somebody attached the sponsorship. Could be wrong though.

It’s definitely a Milo-only thing though (or perhaps at this point an Astros-only thing).

by Xan on Oct 30, 2009 10:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Like the idea of a star-related note on good plays. I, too, will star plays that are noteworthy when I’m scoring.

Another thought I had about box scores: should we get rid of RBIs? I like the web boxes a lot, but I also want something I can glance at easily and see what happened. I’m wondering, though, if RBIs have become somewhat irrelevant. Maybe that’s just the stat-geek in me talking…

by David Coleman on Oct 30, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh, you’re really going to make Joe Morgan mad. :)

by clack on Oct 30, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

RBI is the glamour stat only 2nd to HR.

Have to have glamour stats even if they are less than ideal.

by timmy_ on Oct 30, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chicks don’t dig Runs Created???

by David Coleman on Oct 30, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

boy do i wish.

by timmy_ on Oct 30, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.
Start posting about the Astros »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Pitching Mechanics/Terms To Look/Listen For

Recent FanPosts

Johns_small
Vallejo and Lyon News
Small
Beating a Dead Horse: Should Berkman be a LHB?
Small
Pre-Spring NL Overview/Predictions
Small
Looking ahead to the 2010 mlb draft
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Fbod6_small
Boys of Summer Revisited
Kids_small
Outsider's Astros prospects 30-21
Small
McTaggart: Wandy and Astros going to arbitration
Nsapcs13_large_small
Gumbel, Pearlman throw Bagwell into the McGwire mess

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL

Picture_88_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Facebook

Picture_89_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Twitter

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
St. Louis 91 71 .561 0 Lost 6
Chicago 83 78 .515 7.5 Lost 1
Milwaukee 80 82 .493 11 Won 3
Cincinnati 78 84 .481 13 Won 2
Houston 74 88 .456 17 Lost 3
Pittsburgh 62 99 .385 28.5 Lost 2

(updated 2.9.2010 at 11:43 PM CST)


Humble Blog Managers

Woodstock_small HighLeveragePerformer

Lovelance_small DyingQuail

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

Fbod6_small farm_stros