Wednesday Morning Astros, etc. Round Up
So incase anybody missed it, but the Yankees put it to the Angels last night and A-Rod continued to brush the proverbial dirt off his shoulders as he demonstrates that his previous small sample size of post-season AB don't mean anything. I'm not really an A-Rod fan. I respect him because he's insanely gifted at the game of baseball. But other than that I don't really care. However, his clinic in "this is why a sample of fifty AB's tells you nothing about my true talent level" has me all kinds of sabr-giddy.
Ok, enough with the gushing.
- Richard Justice delivers what is by far on of the most annoying of his articles I've read in sometime. I think the quote I am about to give you will clue you in as to why:
- Zach Levine asks and then attempts to answer: was this the greatest year for first baseman...ever?
- JC Bradbury, the Baseball Economist, checks in again on the subject of clutch. This time he's looking at the marginal effect of clutch pitching in varying situations. I don't think he's keying in on the most definitive factors, but I keep getting excited that someone is trying to think outside the box on clutch studies.
- I'm sure some of you heard, saw, or were clued into the fact that Twittersphere was all ablaze as video of Mariano Rivera spitting on the ball during Tuesday's meeting with the Angels. People got pretty huffy on Twitter, on YouTube, and I'm sure many, many other places. Then BtB went ahead and took a calm, rational approach to the issue and hopefully you can use this quell the senseless debate if need be.
- There are a lot of NL-homer's in our ranks, and there's nothing wrong with that. Jack Moore, of BtB, takes a look what just what the difference between a pitcher batting and a DH batting means for the two respective leagues. The conclusion, I think, you'll find satisfactory.
Now we can look back on Lidge-for-Bourn and see it as the perfect trade because it helped both teams. Both teams got what they'd hoped to get. The Phillies got someone to take care of the ninth inning, and in the process got a championship out of it. The Astros got a dynamic presence at the top of the lineup. Trades don't turn out this way very often. Pretty cool, huh?Perhaps more of the context of the article is necessary to get at the ire, but the obvious reason to be incensed are still there. First, Justice was definitely a vehement Ed Wade critic at points in 2008 and constantly cited this trade. Second, the "truths" which he holds in the body of the article are waaaaaaaaaayyyyyyy too much to claim about Michael Bourn. Third, his defense of Charlie Manuel made me chuckle because I don't think he ever felt that way about Garner when Brad Lidge was all a struggle.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
With respect to the Mariano Rivera event....
it’s also worth noting that MLB investigated the video and the claim that it shows Rivera spitting on the ball. The MLB concluded that he didn’t spit on the ball. Apparently, this was supported by different camera angles and still photos which show that he spit next to, but not on, the ball. MLB also said that their investigation showed that Rivera spits frequently when he is on the mound (OK, TMI).
by clack on Oct 21, 2009 10:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Justice article.
I don’t think I would say that it was the most annoying Justice blog. I was more annoyed by Justice’s blog giving out McLane’s address so that fans can urge him to sign up Phil Garner. That seems like Justice trying to put his finger on the scales for the Astros’ decision. I think Justice tries way too hard to influence Astros’ decisions. (Ironically, he worked at pushing for Cooper’s extension, and then he later worked at getting Cooper fired.) And should that really be his role? Also, the cynical side of me says that Justice wants Garner as the next manager only because he knows him and thinks he will get more quotable stuff from the manager in the future.
Having said that, though, Justice has written so many articles which I found to be disagreeable that I would have a difficult time figuring out which one irritated me more.
by clack on Oct 21, 2009 11:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I just read Justice's latest blog, comparing GMs in Houston...
and I had to laugh at this line, which addresses Ed Wade’s situation:
He inherited Cecil Cooper, and maybe his biggest mistake was that he couldn’t convince Drayton to pull the plug on him earlier. Drayton kept wanting to do right by Coop, and don’t you hate people like that? I made up my mind about the kid around 10 minutes after I said hiring him was a great idea.
So, Justice knew that Cooper was a mistake 10 minutes after he had written that it was a good idea? Of course, Justice doesn’t mention that he pushed for an extension to Cooper in April or May..
by clack on Oct 21, 2009 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sample Size
I don’t think you can complain about people criticizing ARod for a small sample size, and then call BtBs approach rational. Ultimately, I don’t care whether RIvera spit on the ball or not, but plotting the path of one “spitball” versus 12 cutters tells us nothing. Maybe the “spitball” was the worst ball Rivera threw all night, but the spit made it a mediocre pitch. Maybe it was the best ball he threw all night, and was actually clean, and all the pitches that had more break he actually secretly spit on. A sample size of one, particularly when the break of a single pitch can differ so much between throws, is borderline worthless.
by seanbergmanrules on Oct 21, 2009 11:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Random news
Sounds like Acta is getting a second interview.
by OremLK on Oct 21, 2009 3:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mariano Rivera is a New York Yankee baseball player and pitcher, he became even well known for spitting on the ball before he throws it. No one wants to ever defend a New York Yankee, but a Rivera’s spitball isn’t really likely. Despite the fact that he plays for the most evil team in the MLB, a Rivera spitball isn’t likely, and his defeated opponents probably should stop whining. Mariano Rivera is known as a stand up guy, a dedicated professional, and his numbers – they speak for themselves, and there aren’t many 39 year olds that still have a 90 mph plus fastball. Once again – it is hard to defend the Yankees about anything, though while we’re at it – A Rod was on steroids! Seriously – the Angels need a cash advance to find something to do, other than talk about a non-existent Rivera spitball.
by SantinoM on Oct 31, 2009 5:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















