The Crawfish Boxes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Vanderbilt 90, Tennessee 71: What Happened in Nashville

Is the Puma on the decline, or was it just a down year?

An interesting question this off-season is also one that hasn't been talked about much.  Should Lance Berkman be offered a contract extension?  A big gamble, to be certain, and the answer depends much upon how much confidence the front office has in the Big Puma to rebound from this year's performance.

Star-divide

Of course, there's also the possibility that Berkman will be traded.  But let's go ahead and call that unlikely at most.  Probably next-to-impossible.  It seems pretty clear that Lance wants to retire in an Astros uniform, and that Drayton feels the same way.  The question then becomes, when should Lance retire?  His contract could end after next year, though the club has an option for 2011.  Should he really leave the game after just one or two more seasons?

As for his current situation, Lance Berkman will turn 34 just before Spring Training.  His slash line this season was .274/.399/.509.  His BABIP was .300, which is 24 points below his career average; that came with a line drive percentage 2% lower than his career average (1.9% of that went into ground balls).

Let's get one thing straight: .907 OPS is still quite good, even for a first baseman.  Finding that on the free agent market would be both unlikely and expensive.  Finding it within the organization, perhaps even more unlikely.  Mark Teixeira, for example, posted .948 OPS this season (albeit with slightly better defense than Berkman, but in an even friendlier home park).

Another thing that should be mentioned is that 2009 was not Berkman's worst offensive season.  That was 2007, when he hit for .896 OPS, with a similar line drive rate and less walks.  (His fly ball percentage was actually much lower; he was the recipient of a nice share of luck, homering on over 20% of his fly balls.)

The most worrying thing about Berkman's 2009 season was the 20 or so games he missed with a leg injury.  It should be noted, however, that he also missed 27 games in 2005 with a leg problem, so this isn't unprecedented for him.

One thing we do know is that Berkman himself feels bad about this season.  He's said as much.  Part of this is probably due to the still-systematic overt focus on batting average in MLB and sportswriting.  Richard Justice has attacked Berkman's season relentlessly, mostly citing his AVG.

I think he's wrong.  I think he's still a great hitter, and I think he will rebound in 2010 and continue to be a valuable hitter for at least several more years.  As such, I think the Astros should gamble and sign him to an extension.  Here are my reasons.

One, and don't take this the wrong way, but I'd rather the Astros re-sign him after a down year.  It would be better for the team.  Now, I'm not saying Berkman doesn't deserve big money, but if he has a 2008-like rebound year next season, the Astros may wind up significantly over-paying him in an effort to lock him up for the remainder of his career.  According to WAR, he was worth $30.5 million in '08.  He wouldn't get paid that much, but even still--ouch.  If we sign him to an extension this year, we'll be more likely to pay him fairly.

Two, if the Astros negotiate with him now, there is a chance they can try to rework his current contract as part of the negotiations and shift some of the money he's owed to later years.  Which would free up payroll this winter to improve the team.  Lance wants to see the team win as much as anyone, and the best way to do that would be to spend more money bolstering the infield and starting rotation.

Finally, it's a vote of confidence in Berkman.  One that he sorely needs, after all the flak he's taken this year.  It'll shut up the talk about trading him and show him that the front office believes he has what it takes to lead this team's offense.

Because he does.  Of all the Astros' big contracts, Berkman's is the one I'd least like to see gotten rid of.  He's a great guy, but more than that, he's one of the game's greatest first basemen.  I'd like to see him spend his last playing years as an Astro, but more than that, I think that--practically speaking--it's the right move.

What say you?

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Berkman’s season isn’t that far “down” (as evidenced by his over-.900 OPS), and would be an exceptional season if it was posted by someone like Carlos Lee. Using the BABIP prediction tool at Hardball Times, it appears that Berkman was very unlucky with his hits this year.

An extension—-I don’t know. My initial reaction is negative, partly because I think about some teams which have done poorly with similar contract extension (i.e. Todd Helton). But you raise some interesting points.

by clack on Oct 14, 2009 8:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I agree that it isn’t really down very much. Normal variation in luck from year to year could account for most of it. However, because so many in the establishment are still obsessed with batting average, most seem to think it was some horribly bad year. So much the better for us to get a good value on an extension, in my opinion!

by OremLK on Oct 14, 2009 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve got to admit that when I saw the title of this fanpost, I thought it was going to just be another re-hash of Justice’s whining about a .900+ OPS not being good enough. I’m very glad to say that I was wrong. There’s a lot of good food for thought in here.

My inclination is to shy away from a full extension. I’m not a huge fan of giving large-dollar extensions to age 35+ seasons…that seems like dicey territory, though I could be swayed by seeing longevity numbers that point the other way.

I think Lance will probably use his contract renewal in 2011 as leverage to get management to prove its commitment to winning (through a high-calibre signing or two). He’s got a fulfilling life outside of baseball (church, kids, etc.), so I can imagine him walking away from the game a little easier than other players if it doesn’t look like he’s going to be on a team with a shot at the playoffs.

by AstroAndy on Oct 14, 2009 8:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I've come to the conclusion

That Lance has a pattern, he’s great every even year, and good every odd year (down year)…go check the stats it’s true!

Lance has already said he doesn’t know if he will play past his contract, which to me says he knows he’s going into his twilight years, and he’s making public comments suggesting the organization will need to fork over some doe to keep him around. Drayton runs the Astros like a business and Lance realizes that he’s a big draw for ticket sales, so don’t expect a contract extension to come cheap or necessarily with a home town discount.

by timmy_ on Oct 15, 2009 7:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No extension for Lance

Wrong side of 30, slightly overrated to begin with and his work ethic, or lack of, is beginning to show through the natural talent.

It’s time for Berkman, Oswalt and Lee to find a new home. The Rangers would love to have either guy and they could give you a decent return of young talent. The youth movement has begun with Norris, Bourn, Pence, Manzella, Johnson and soon Castro. There’s no reason to have high priced older guys who be traded and go help a contender now.

by AstrosBill on Nov 13, 2009 3:08 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Lance and Roy

Well both of these players have great upsides even though they seem to be in peaks of their carrers. I am a die hard fan of both as well as an Astro’s fan. I do feel that the best senerio for the team and these two guys are to trade them for their value to a team that more than likely have a shot at the WS. I think that they would both love the chance at a ring before retirement (avoids issues with No Trade clauses) and it would drop payroll and a possibility at some decent prospects.

by Astros #1 Fa on Nov 14, 2009 1:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.
Start posting about the Astros »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Pitching Mechanics/Terms To Look/Listen For

Recent FanPosts

Johns_small
Vallejo and Lyon News
Small
Beating a Dead Horse: Should Berkman be a LHB?
Small
Pre-Spring NL Overview/Predictions
Small
Looking ahead to the 2010 mlb draft
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Fbod6_small
Boys of Summer Revisited
Kids_small
Outsider's Astros prospects 30-21
Small
McTaggart: Wandy and Astros going to arbitration
Nsapcs13_large_small
Gumbel, Pearlman throw Bagwell into the McGwire mess

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL

Picture_88_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Facebook

Picture_89_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Twitter

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
St. Louis 91 71 .561 0 Lost 6
Chicago 83 78 .515 7.5 Lost 1
Milwaukee 80 82 .493 11 Won 3
Cincinnati 78 84 .481 13 Won 2
Houston 74 88 .456 17 Lost 3
Pittsburgh 62 99 .385 28.5 Lost 2

(updated 2.10.2010 at 5:43 AM CST)


Humble Blog Managers

Woodstock_small HighLeveragePerformer

Lovelance_small DyingQuail

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

Fbod6_small farm_stros