Astros Find the Confines VERY Friendly and I Eat My Hat...
If you would have asked me in late July or early August, I would have told you that the Astros, as a franchise, were screwed. In my first week here I stated that I'd be just as happy if we stumbled through the rest of the season, finished in the last half of MLB, and got our 1st round draft pick protected so that Ben Sheets' opportunity cost would decrease. It was harsh and met with a lot of criticism, but I felt totally betrayed by this franchise and throughly justified in that opinion. The trade deadline had come and gone and all we did was acquire more old/broken players instead of capitalizing on an opportunity to grow for the future. The odds us of making the post season, statistically, were better then than they are now, but it seemed impossible. I don't know that they are anymore.
Roy Oswalt had started the season obviously not 100%, Wandy sat out the first month of the season, JR Towles was overwhelmed, Michael Bourn was overwhelmed, and Hunter Pence just seemed lost. While I knew that our players were vastly underperforming, I also questioned the evaluation of their talent. I saw problem after problem pile up, and it hurt.
HighLeveragePerformer and I got in into blogging this season after we vehemently disagreed with another Astros blogger's postulation that the Astros were screwed this year. According to that person, we couldn't be much better than a 75 win team -- at best. We both knew that was wrong or a least felt like it was. HLP wrote a guest post on that blog and argued that there was enough talent out there for this team to be a .500 team, +/- 2 wins was the cushion he gave. I helped him tweak parts of it and the gist of HLP and mine's defense of that position rested on the following: Backe would have to be a solid 2/3 starter, Wandy would have to be just shy of an ace, Roy would have to be Roy, Towles and Bourn would have to live up to expectations, and the bull pen would have to be rock solid. For two solid months of this season, none of that was true. In spite of falling short of what I considered the only way this team could find success, it has. A lot could be luck, but some of it has been the statistically elusive clutch factor. .500 looks like a very legitimate reality, and the play-offs are 6.5 games away from a team that really only has one pitcher and a bunch of question marks -- and that one guy is getting abused.
While the Brewers seem to be imploding slightly, we still have other teams we have to leap frog -- making play off hopes seem all the sillier. Regardless of whether or not the Astros play baseball in October, they have succeeded in making baseball in September worth watching. Ultimately, that's all any fan of a team can ask of it. While we could debate the merits of that statement, there is something more important that I have come to realize. We seem to have found the right formula for scoring runs and our pitchers seem to have found their strides. Those elements only coexisted for three weeks in May before that. In spite of the staff ace being awful for half a season and the guy everyone counted on being number two missing significant amounts of time, the team has managed to win baseball games. If the organization was Risk Neutral, it could concieveably just resign everyone on this roster and all it would require is Roy Oswalt not being terrible for half a season and suddenly we could easily be legitimate play off contenders. Have Wandy healthy and maybe we're challenging for the NL Central. It would be stupid, but that's the kind of luck this team has had to deal with this year.
I DON'T believe that is a good plan, it would be stupid to be Risk Neutral in this situation, but a Risk Adverse strategy actually make since in light of our recent success. It didn't to me a month ago. If Ben Sheets were added to this team and he pitched 130 innings of Ben Sheets baseball, that alone makes up the difference in us being 6.5 games out of the Wild Card -- even if Roy Oswalt was awful for 90 games.
We have a lot to be excited for, not just a series sweep against an interdivisional rival who happens to be the best team in the NL, but because we're on the cusp of being a great team again. It feels good to have something to hope for, even if this house of cards is built on a shaky foundation of luck given our Pythag W/L record. The next four weeks will be exciting to watch (or at least the next week at a minimum) and the offseason will have the same air of excitement to it as 2006-2007 did. Only this time, we have a GM at the helm who, though made some seemingly boneheaded decisions, has, by and large, seen most of his moves be justified. I took my hat out of the Ed Wade fan club's ring, but I'll throw it back in.
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Just have to say
YAHOOO!!! This is fun again!
by Xan on
Sep 4, 2008 1:28 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It feels so good.
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by DyingQuail on
Sep 4, 2008 1:58 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Assuming Brewers go 12-11 (which is my estimate of what they'll do - probably way off)
Astros must go 18-4. It’s actual doable with the relatively weak schedule they have remaining. It’s long shot. Still it’s fun following their escapades.
Astros fan for life
by Joe in Birmingham on
Sep 4, 2008 2:27 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And if Phillies go 14-8 (another goofy estimate by me)
Astros beat them with 20-4 run. The key here is figuring out how to win 20 of the last 24 games. A month or two back we discussed how they needed a 20 game win streak That would help (even a dozen more in a row now would help) . that’s the plan – I’ll let someone else work out the details.
Astros fan for life
by Joe in Birmingham on
Sep 4, 2008 2:34 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They key here is just to win every damn game
Here, I’ll give you a cliche’.
“We’re just going to worry about our games and try to win every game and not worry about what other teams are doing”
:)
I just wish this team played this well during a bigger portion of the season..
Go 'Stros!
by Stros Bro on
Sep 4, 2008 6:47 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
if we could have just managed .500 baseball through June and July, we’d be sitting at 79-61 and only 1.5 out of the wild card. our slumps were too slumpy.
by littlevisigoth on
Sep 4, 2008 9:47 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Astros have made things interesting.
And, even if it’s only for a short while, that is a lot more than we could have expected. So, let’s enjoy it. If the Astros were to win, it would probably have to fall along the lines of the 2004 team’s surge to the playoffs. That team played incredibly well in the final month, jumped over several teams to the wild card, and still required an implosion by the Cubs in the final week. The 2004 team’s playoff chances appeared dead, as late as the last week of the season, but the Cubs couldn’t hold on.
By the way, I will point out that my early article on the impact of Carlos Lee’s loss….
http://www.crawfishboxes.com/2008/8/15/594577/what-is-the-impact-of-carl
seems to be correct in concluding that the Astros could survive without Lee. If anything the quantification may have been conservative. I assumed that Wigginton would be the same as Lee on defense in LF. Wigginton appears to be getting increasingly comfortable playing defense in LF, and it is possible that he is a defensive improvement over Lee in LF.
by clack on
Sep 4, 2008 7:42 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You had every right to be pissed
You and HLP debuted here at the nadir of the season, if I recall. Who among us wasn’t despondent then? I just told myself this wasn’t our year, and that it might be a few years until we were back. If you have a loyalty to a particular team, the reality is that there will be down years, or even down eras. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: for me, enduring the team’s crappy periods make the hot streaks all the more special. This year it so happens that we have both in the same season. As hot as they are now and as much as I’m loving it, the way the season has gone, I wouldn’t be surprised if they collapsed (though I certainly wouldn’t be happy about it).
Is luck playing a part in this now? Undoubtedly. But luck probably had something to do with a lot of the losses in the earlier part of the season. You wish we were 6.5 games closer? We’ve lost 8 games to the Pirates this year. If that’s not enough to drive you crazy, consider this: winning an extra 1.5 games a month for the first five months of the season would have us ahead of Milwaukee.
Do I expect that we’ll contend next year? Frank Thomas once said something about nothing being as humbling as playing the game of baseball. A close second might be trying to predict the game of baseball.
Hi, my name is Rich and I'm an Astroholic.
by Austin Astroholic on
Sep 4, 2008 12:17 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
wild card standings are cool to see - especially the streaks of the 'stros vs. teams ahead of us
how ’bout putting that sweet widget in the sidebar?
It helps if the hitter thinks you're a little crazy. - Nolan
by clockwerks on
Sep 4, 2008 1:08 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't have the ability to do it, but I'll shoot an email to Stros Bros. Good call.
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
by DyingQuail on
Sep 4, 2008 1:10 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ask and you shall receive
Go 'Stros!
by Stros Bro on
Sep 4, 2008 6:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Brewers lost Thursday night to San Diego.
Astros six games back of Brewers and right on the heels of Cardinals and Phillies in Wild Card race.
Astros fan for life
by Joe in Birmingham on
Sep 4, 2008 10:16 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs



















