The Crawfish Boxes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Houston Astros : Season 1/3 Over

Before last nights game, the Astros had completed exactly 1/3 of their regular season with a 30-24 record.  I like to mess with projected stats quite a bit... not that I think they really mean a whole lot, but because they really show how well a player or team has done over a much shorter period of time. 

If I were to project the record for the Astros after 1/3 of the season, it would put the Astros on pace for a 90 win season, with 72 losses.  So my question to you is...  If I asked you right now, whether you could either take the 90 win season, or take a chance at having less than or more than 90 wins at the end of the season... what would you do?  Would you take the 90 wins now and hope it's good enough for a post season birth?  Or would you take your chances with the rest of the season and possibly have a better or worse record? 

In 2007, 90 wins would have been good enough to win both the NL East and Central divisions and would have put a team in a tie for 1st place in the NL west.  In the American League, 90 wins, would have been good enough for 2nd place in the Wild Card standings, thus not good enough for a post season birth. 

In 2006, 90 wins would have been good enough 1st place in the NL Central and West, and 2nd place in the NL east, but once again, only good enough for T-3rd place in the AL Wild Card. 

In 2005, 90 wins would have been good enough for T-1st in the NL East, 2nd in the NL Central and 1st in the NL west which would have at least earned playoff for the wild card.  In the AL, 90 wins would have been good enough for 4th in the Wild Card. 

So what does that mean?  Well, the 1st thing that jumps out at me is that there are some really good teams in the AL, and some really bad teams in the AL... 90 wins just isn't good enough if you're an AL team.  But in the National League, 90 wins usually is good enough for at least a wild card birth and will typically at least put you in the running for the division.  I guess the Astros should be thankful they are in the National League. 

So the question again... would you take 90 wins now?  My answer would be a yes.  With pitching issues the Astros have, I would be pretty happy to have 90 wins at the end of the season.  I think this offense with a good pitching staff would be better than 90 wins, I just don't think that our pitching is good enough to wish for much more.  Obviously I can't just get my 90 wins now and go home... but when all things are said and done...  If we were in the AL... my answer would probably be different... but we're not so... if 90 wins is what we get... I believe I'll be happy... and I believe we'll be in the post season.

Poll
If you could be assured exactly 90 wins at the end of the season... are you taking it?
Yes
31 votes
No
7 votes

38 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The Astros still have several problem areas....

the pitching staff being first and foremost. But I would also add the lack of offensive production from C and CF. So, I am not convinced that the Astros are a 90 win team. I certainly hope so. But if given the hypothetical chance at making 90 wins a certainty, I would take it.

by clack on May 30, 2008 1:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hope Springs Eternal

The bullpen seems solid, with Geary back and Sampson added, plus Brocail and Valverde forming a good back-end, I think the bullpen is pretty good. So, with a good bullpen and a good offense, the best O I can remember in Houston in quite some time, can’t we do better than 90? It seems to be more a question of will our youth hold or fold. Can Moeller and Chacon keep doing what they are doing. Backe has started to look very good. Surely, Wandy will regain form soon, and his form was very good early season. Biggest question for me is when, or if, Os returns to ace form. If the Os of old shows up and wins 15-20 and these youngsters keep doing what they’re doing, then we’ll make a run at the division. And, if we do that, then we would likely make a free agent pitching acquisition to make a serious playoff run. Isn’t this a plausible scenario for beating the 90 win mark? Of course, the flipside is that we have some injuries, Chacon, Moeller, Backe have some struggles, and Roy wins less than 15. So, I give it 50/50 on winning 90 or more. And, those are odds I’ll take in May!

by DFWTrojan on May 30, 2008 3:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Of course it's plausible

And you could make a case that 90 wins would be easy to get to, given how bad we started off and how we look now…

Go 'Stros!

by Stros Bro on May 30, 2008 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The betting odds in Las Vegas

for the Astros to BREAK EVEN for the season are 5-4 against. That in itself doesn’t really mean anything, but if any of you are feeling frisky enough to bet that the Astros will win 90 games, which I think would win the Central Division for them, you can get 15 to 1 odds on your money (it was 25-1 as recently as 2 weeks ago).

If the Astros do not win 90 games, then I think the division winner will need more than 90, but if the Astros can win 90, I think they will have an excellent chance of taking the division, as some of those wins will be at the expense of the other contenders.

The Pythagorean projection for the Astros is 83-79, meaning they would play 53-54 for the balance of the season. Fortunately, the games are played on the field and not in the betting parlors or on the statisticians’ computers. However, all things considered, if the Astros had the chance to take 90 wins certain for the season at this point, I think they should jump on it like flies on watermelon!

It takes more than pitching to win a pennant, but not much!

by bwhite2323 on May 30, 2008 5:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Crawfishboxes, the SBNation blog for the Houston Astros.
Start posting about the Astros »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Pitching Mechanics/Terms To Look/Listen For

Recent FanPosts

Johns_small
Vallejo and Lyon News
Small
Beating a Dead Horse: Should Berkman be a LHB?
Small
Pre-Spring NL Overview/Predictions
Small
Looking ahead to the 2010 mlb draft
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Fbod6_small
Boys of Summer Revisited
Kids_small
Outsider's Astros prospects 30-21
Small
McTaggart: Wandy and Astros going to arbitration
Nsapcs13_large_small
Gumbel, Pearlman throw Bagwell into the McGwire mess

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL

Picture_88_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Facebook

Picture_89_medium The Crawfish Boxes on Twitter

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
St. Louis 91 71 .561 0 Lost 6
Chicago 83 78 .515 7.5 Lost 1
Milwaukee 80 82 .493 11 Won 3
Cincinnati 78 84 .481 13 Won 2
Houston 74 88 .456 17 Lost 3
Pittsburgh 62 99 .385 28.5 Lost 2

(updated 2.9.2010 at 11:43 PM CST)


Humble Blog Managers

Woodstock_small HighLeveragePerformer

Lovelance_small DyingQuail

Old_school_dome_logo_small David Coleman

Editors

Nsapcs13_large_small clack

Fbod6_small farm_stros