Houston Astros : 1st Series Postives and Negatives
The Houston Astros just completed their first series of the 2008 baseball season by going 1-3 against the San Diego Padres. A 1-3 start isn't anything to write home about, and the offense didn't exactly start out the season as I had expected; but there were some positives that came from this series.
Positives
Team combined 1.000 fielding percentage. Surprising huh? After having a lackluster spring training fielding wise with Ty Wigginton leading with 9 errors during spring training(39 team combined), the Astros got through the entire series with the Padres without making an error. Not to say that the Astros were perfect in the field(there were a few miscues), but overall, I am thrilled with the way the 'Stros played defense.
Chacon and Backe pitched about as good as can be expected. Backe went 5 innings and gave up 2 runs earning a 3.6 ERA while Chacon went 6 innings today and only gave up 2 runs. Chacon had me scared after the 1st inning today in which he gave up 2 runs, but he turned it around and was very good for the next 5 innings.
Villarreal, Geary and Brocail went a combined 7 innings in relief during the series and only gave up 1 run. If those 3 can continue to pitch well for the entire season, then the Astros could be more of a contender than most think.
Lance Berkman. Not exactly a high average(.250), but he leads the team in RBI's(3, all on 1 swing), stole 2 bases and hit a game winning home run to give the Astros their only win so far. He also has 3 doubles, which is more than he had for the first few months last season. Hopefully Lance will progress and have a much faster start this season than last season.
Astros base-running has been great. 6 stolen bases in 3 games(Bourn 3, Berkman 2, and Wigginton 1) without being caught once. The most surprising of the stolen bases is obviously Wigginton who has only stole 8 bases in the previous 4 years combined. And the best part about it... they are doing it with means. Lance's stolen base last night was one of the main reasons the Astros were able to come back in that game.
Negatives
The Astros offense has been dismal. The Astros have one of the top 3 or 4 offensive lineups in all of baseball(in my opinion) and maybe in the top 2(behind the Tigers), yet they have only scored 12 runs(and 9 of them in 1 game) during this entire 4 game series. With this lineup, the Astros should be scoring 5+ runs a game on a normal basis. Not one of the Astros regular starters are hitting over .300 with only 3 of them batting over .200. That's pretty sad for a team with so much offensive talent.
1-3 record with no starter getting a win.
Looking at the positives and negatives, you would think that since there are so many more positives, that the Astros would have better record. Well, the Astros big negative is their offense... and it has been the main reason that the Astros haven't won more games. In the three games that the Astros have lost, they've given up a combined 9 runs which averages out to 3 runs per game. I'll take 3 runs per game against every day. A team that averages 3 runs or less given up per game, is a team that wins a ton of games.
0 recs |
13
comments
Read Related
Comments
My number is 4
I agree, Stros Bro. Although I've always said the key is 4 runs. The days of winning 2-1 are gone for the Astros. But with this powerful offensive line-up, it shouldn't matter. If the pitchers can hold a team to 4 runs or less, the offense should be able to post the 4 runs or more needed to win more times than not. The only game in this series where the pitchers gave up more than 4, we scored 9 and won.
We lose 7-6, then I blame the pitchers (unless there were errors). We lose 4-3, then I blame the hitters.
by beeleever on Apr 3, 2008 8:30 PM CDT 0 recs
I like it...
and I'll take the offense by the time a whole season shakes out.
Phear T.S.'s Crawdaddies...
by TexSkins on
Apr 4, 2008 12:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I love it! Thanks!
I've been doing this in my head each year, but it only lasts for the first couple of weeks. After about ten games, I can't keep track any more (I'd be horrible at counting cards in Las Vegas!). This will be great to be able to watch it through the season.
by beeleever on
Apr 5, 2008 10:15 AM CDT
up
0 recs
One followup - Extra Innings
My hubby asked how this will work for extra innings? My suggestion would be to look at the score at the end of the ninth - to assign the points. I.e., Lose 7-6 in 15 innings, but tied at 5 after the 9th - it's the pitcher's loss. Win 7-6 in 15, but tied at 5 after the 9th - it's the offense's win. Lose 7-6 in 15, but tied at 3 after 9, offense's loss. Win 7-6 in 15 but tied at 3 after 9, pitcher's win.
Another option would be to add 1 run per every two innings to the "allowed/needed" in extra innings.
Thoughts?
by beeleever on
Apr 5, 2008 10:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Hmmm
Didn't think about it...
I think we'll go with your first suggestion... would be the easiest for me as well as the most logical in my opinion. Thanks for bringing that to my attention!
Go 'Stros!
by Stros Bro on
Apr 5, 2008 8:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Oh, one more thing
I made it a fanpost now so people can comment on it... :) Also updated the link on the left hand side(if you haven't noticed, there is a CFB originals section starting up on the left bar
Go 'Stros!
by Stros Bro on
Apr 5, 2008 9:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't take much from the fielding percent....
A couple of plays easily could have been scored as errors. Wigginton still has appeared shaky at 3d base. Carlos Lee made three horrible fielding plays in Game 3, and each one ultimately figured in a run scoring. The most positive defensive signs are Michael Bourn, who has been great in CF, and the fact that Tejada doesn't look half bad at shorstop.
by clack on Apr 3, 2008 9:07 PM CDT 0 recs
This offense...
has to come around. There were lots of good individual signs (including all the HR's, just mostly of the solo variety).
As for the pitching, if Chacon and Backe keep up this same performance all year, and if Wandy can at least repeat his home performance from last yaer? Then we're more than golden.
by BTastros on Apr 3, 2008 9:19 PM CDT 0 recs
In other words...
This series was the exact opposite of what we expected going in: the pitching was not bad (taking into account they were facing a less than stellar lineup), and the offense was terrible.
by BTastros on Apr 3, 2008 9:21 PM CDT 0 recs
Biggest negative
You left off Roy O.
He looked like the Roy O. of some off games last year, rather than the Roy O of 2006 & earlier years. If Royu O. has slipped a notch & becomes just another starting pitcher, forget about the state of the offense, fielding range on the left side, etc. None of it will matter. Without a Peavy-Zambrano-Sheets-level ace, this team is doomed.
It'll be vintage Rangers baseball, and I hate Rangers baseball.
by maris61 on Apr 4, 2008 12:33 PM CDT 0 recs
I thought about adding him
But... I can't make myself add Roy-O as a negative for anything.. :)
Go 'Stros!
by Stros Bro on
Apr 4, 2008 5:08 PM CDT
up
0 recs
















