Astros Hot Stove Noise 11/29/08: Ed Wade just doesn't get it
by DyingQuail
on Nov 29, 2008 11:01 AM CST
in Hot Stove
1 comment
****UPDATE***** The Mets are apparently the Mets have had discussions with Ed Wade on Valverde. Does anyone know of their stud prospects?
In pretty much an elaboration of yesterday's blog piece, McTaggart had a full story in the Chronicle today going into further detail about what the Wolf negotiations cooling down really meant. Clack was dead on the money yesterday when he read into the blog post that Ed Wade was still looking to sign Wolf, he just needed to free up some money via trades. McTaggart tosses out Valverde and/or Wigginton as the trade bait Ed Wade will fish with at the up coming GM meetings.
On what planet does that make sense? Why would you trade your 3B and/or NL Saves leading closer, so you can sign your number three pitcher, who has a true talent level of a number four or five? Even if you thought Wolf was going to be that good, how do you address the offensive gap that Wigginton leaves the line-up? Yes Sutton and Johnson were good in the AFL, but that by no means makes them NL ready. And who does Ed Wade think will close games? I don't think closers are important, but I also know that there is not a chance in hell that Cooper and Robinson can successfully manage a closer by committee for longer than a half-inning frame on opening day before they start screwing it up. What do we gain by signing a 32 year-old pitcher who had a lightening in a bottle performance with us for two months? Especially when this guy is coming off multiple shoulder surgeries? Seriously, what? Besides another bloated, asinine amount of money awarded to a free agent, that will likely hampering future spending as a result of it.
I don't mind if the Astros suck by design. If Ed Wade came out tomorrow and said, "We're entering a rebuilding phase, expect us to be back up and running in 2011-2012," I'd throw him a parade. But trading players who were among the best at their position, in the league, so that you can sign Randy Wolf to a multi-year deal doesn't make a damn bit of sense. One or the other Ed Wade: build a contender or rebuild? You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
At this point I have to stop because this rant could go on, but here's to hoping someone talks one iota of common sense into Ed Wade's head.
0 recs |
1 comment
|
Email
Print
Comments
I posted my article 4 minutes after yours....
so, I didn’t see it first. But I think they are complementary articles, since I primarily deal with the arbitration decision. However, as I pondered the arbitration decision questions, it seemed like it isn’t a coincidence that the announcement about stopping negotiations for Wolf comes on the weekend before the arbitration deadline. Perhaps the Astros still haven’t made their decisions on arbitration, and realize that they need to do so before making signing decisions. Or, more likely, they need the answers (i.e., who accepts) from arbitration in order to go forward. McTaggert’s article says that the Astros had expressed a willingness in the past to negotiate a multi-year contract with Wolf. Let that sink in for a moment…Wolf on a 3 year contract, yikes! Given that choice, a one year contract through arbitration doesn’t look so bad.
But I agree with your points, if it is what I suggested in a previous thread (get rid of high quality players so you have budget room to sign a mid-level starter). Seems irrational. So that may be why I search for a more rational explanation or strategy in all this.
I have seen some people suggest that McLane pulled the rug out from under Wade, with comparisons made to the reason that Hunsicker left. I have a hard time beileving it. But it does seem odd that Wade had been fully willing to engage in contract negotiations with Wolf previously, because he would have known what he knows now, in terms of a future budget squeeze This leaves open the possibility that this is a tactical or strategic maneuver by Wade to change his negotiating posture. Or, alternatively, McLane just pulled the rug out at the last minute…which would be a bad sign, indeed.
by clack on
Nov 29, 2008 11:34 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on The Crawfish Boxes
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
New FanPost
THE CRAWFISH BOXES GETS SOCIAL
Current Series
Giants lead the series 1-0
| Fri 07/03 | 0 - 13 loss | |
|
Houston Astros
Saturday, Jul 4, 2009, 3:05 PM CDT Sunny. Game time temperature around 65. |
||
| Sun 07/05 | 3:05 PM CDT | |
NL Central Standings
| W | L | PCT | GB | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. Louis
|
44 | 38 | .536 | 0 | Won 3 |
|
Milwaukee
|
42 | 38 | .525 | 1 | Lost 3 |
|
Chicago
|
39 | 38 | .506 | 2.5 | Won 3 |
|
Cincinnati
|
39 | 39 | .500 | 3 | Lost 1 |
|
Houston
|
38 | 40 | .487 | 4 | Lost 1 |
|
Pittsburgh
|
37 | 43 | .462 | 6 | Won 1 |
(updated 7.4.2009 at 11:45 AM CDT)
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
