Starting Pitching?
Winter meetings are over and no moves were made on the starting pitching side.
Is anybody else worried about our starting pitching? Since we're keeping Everett and using Matsui along with Bourn, it looks like the strategy is classic National League speed + defense.
Well, for that to work, the pitching needs to be rock solid. Besides the question mark at closer, what about our starters?
We have plenty of candidates for the 3, 4, and 5 slots, but what about #2 to slug it out with Oz?
Surely that isn't Woody...
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Right now...
Throwing Woody into the mix, you have a bunch of guys fighting for the final spots. Sampson, Albers, Patton, Backe. Who am I forgetting? What's the status on Nieve?
So... you've got Roy, Wandy, Backe, Woody and... right now, it'd probably be Albers. That puts Sampson in the pen. Nieve and Patton probably start in Round Rock unless they're 110% healthy.
Not bad, not great. After a definate #1 starter, it's an average rotation with the chance to become pretty good. We'll see if Wandy puts everything together and becomes a true 32 guy. This is year 2 after the Tommy John surgery for Backe, so we'll see if he's the Backe of old. This is also the make or break year for both Albers and Sampson.
If nothing else, it'll be an interesting year. Oh, and then there's Roy.
#2 Starter
Sure, I'm worried about the rotation.
The Astros could take a risk on one of the previously injured free agents. Jennings and Lieber are the best bets, IMO. Lieber didn't injure his arm (it was his foot), so he should be able to come back well...and he has been surprisingly effective, particularly when you consider the ballpark where he pitches. Jennings' elbow surgery was not TJ, which means he should be ready by spring training.
Another idea, which I alluded to in another thread, is to trade for a guy like Aaron Heilman. He is great set up reliever who wants to start. He was a good starter when he came up as a rookie, but the Mets only like him as a late inning reliever. My point is that, with the high cost of starting pitchers, they may need to think about players who could become a No. 2 if given the chance. I don't know what it would take to get Heilman...perhaps a reliever plus one of the young starters.
Wade Doesn't Trade Relievers
Instead of getting someone else I would like to see them give all the guys a shot and see who wins a place in the rotation. Tell them Roy and Wandy will be in the rotation - to hell with Woody that was dumb to start with - and let Sampson, Albers, Patton, Paulino, Backe and whoever else fight it out for the final three spots. Best Pitchers Win!
Rotation
Roy
Wandy
Sampson
Woody
Backe
Round Rock
Paulino
Patton
neive
albers
i just love sampson
I'm gonna throw something out there
Mark Prior
He'd be like an injured, whiny Roger Clemens coming in after the start of the season.
I haven't decided if I'm serious or not just yet. It'll be curious to see what sort of package it takes to get him, but there's a decent chance that the Cubs or some other fortune teller gets some good, cheap pitching for the better part of a year.
this is me
by littlevisigoth on Dec 7, 2007 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
I would take a chance on Prior
I agree
Of the injury risk pitchers out there, though, he seems to have the highest potential to light things up for at least a season.
Maybe I'm pollyannish
It'd be nice to add a nice starter (say Mike James from Braves if he's still available - I can't keep up).
I'd rather get Joe Nathan from Minnesota as a closer.
by Joe in Birmingham on Dec 7, 2007 2:54 PM CST reply actions
What to say...
Just a thought...

by 























