Blum Back to the 'Stros?
I really have no credible reference for this, other than I heard that Geoff Blum was thinking hard about coming back to the Astros for the 2008-2009 season.
I for one liked Blum when he was here and I'm sure you all remember what he did to us during the World Series. This could also be the 2nd coming of the Blum's Blondes!
Would you like to have Blum back? He would basically be the replacement for Bruntlett/Loretta being able to play any position other than pitcher and catcher.
Hit up the entry link to vote.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A Credible source is
Already posted my reaction...
OFFENSE
Loretta > Blum
Blum = Bruntlett
DEFENSE
Blum > Loretta
Bruntlett > Blum
i have to disagree
by astromaniac on Nov 15, 2007 6:52 AM CST up reply actions
respectfully disagree...
Blum OPS .614,.695..506,.659, .685
Bruntlett OPS (only 4 yrs. available)
.847,.705,.695,.629
Blum and Loretta have hit identical number of HRs over the last 2 years (9). But Loretta had about 1/3 or so more at bats and Blum hit in cavernous Petco Park....so, yes, Blum probably has a tad more power than Loretta.
not completely against it
he strikes out more than loretta or OP and has a substantially lower career OBP than both, so he's not a replacement for a clutch hitter off the bench. he is a switch hitter and offers a tad more at the plate than Bruntlett (although the numbers are VERY similar... K's are about the same, but Blum's edge in SLG is a little bigger than Bruntlett's edge in OBP). of course he's probably more versatile than any of our other choices on defense (but no Bruntlett... of course he's not a choice).
i think he fills a different role than Burke, but probably makes Loretta superfluous (unless Loretta becomes nothing but a RH pinch hitter). now Loretta is a Type B free agent, but to get anything for him, we have to offer him arbitration. why would we do that if we've already signed Blum?
if OP and Loretta are gone, with Bruntlett being gone, i think it's a reasonable signing, but the timing is kind of a head-scratcher (if it goes down anytime soon).
too weak on offense
And signing Blum makes no sense before it's certain that Matsui, Castillo or Iguchi isn't coming here. If one of them does, then Burke and Blum are redundant as utility players and one would need to be traded. They'd have 0 trade value at that point, since it would obvious the Astros would need to dump one of them.
Blum's an aging, mediocre journeyman. You could find another player just like him almost anywhere.
Cody Ransom would be cheaper. I'd pass on Blum.
by waiting46yrs on Nov 15, 2007 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
agree on (almost) all points
i'd say, at a minimum, the poll should have a "Not yet!" option.
by littlevisigoth on Nov 15, 2007 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
Barry Bonds
I'm glad and I'm sad. Glad that he didn't get away with the lies, but sad for the game.
Fox news in Houston...
Hopefully Blum is only taking...
Done deal
Guess Wade determined a utility player was a need and Blum was the best available man for the job. Not sure I disagree, but this probably makes offering Loretta arbitration moot. We'll see what happens next. I sure hope it's not a Kaz Matsui signing.
Blum, Lineup
If its any consolation, Matsui and Bourn are excellent base runners, which has some value. (Kaz: 62 SB/9 CS 87%) and (Bourn: 19/3, 86 %). Bourn's high success rate is even more impressive when you consider that the majority of Bourn's sb's were in pinch run situations. That is unreal. You need at least a 70 % success rate, give or take, to break even on the investment, so at least the duo gets the bang for their buck when they do get on. Matsui never hits into double plays (go look, I promise you will be impressed ), and will advance runners. He scored 84 runs in 410 AB's, which is quite a few for a .342 OB % last season. It might be ok.
by BigPuma123 on Dec 5, 2007 10:26 PM CST up reply actions

by 





















