'Stros Fail To Reach Agreement With White Sox--So Far
Jose De Jesus Ortiz reports that a deal sending Willy Taveras and Taylor Buchholz to the White Sox for righthander Jon Garland has seemingly died on the vine.
Looks like Ortiz broke the story this morning, based on a quote he had from Tal Smith saying a deal was near, that reporters should "stick around the press room."
And then Ken Rosenthal updated midmorning by suggesting that Jason Hirsh may have been added to sweeten the pot.
But now both Ortiz and Newsday's Ken Davidoff are reporting that the team's contingents are leaving the meetings without a deal in place.
Ortiz suggests that negotiations may have broken down because Taylor flunked a physical, which Buchholz himself denies.
The All-Star Garland has won 18 games two years running, and has pitched 200 innings three years in a row. In all years but two of his seven-year career, he has posted an ERA+ at 100 or above. He posted a 3.50 ERA and a 1.18 WHIP during the Pale Hose's magical 2005, but has never before or since been so good. Still, there's little question that he is an above league average pitcher.
I still think that Hirsh can be an ace, but a bird in the hand, right?
The major questions here are whether the Astros would make the trade for Garland AND still sign Andy, and also what Andy's reaction to this news might be.
Given my opinion of Andy's offseason gamesmanship, and the fact that the durable Garland, at only 27 years of age, still has upside, I'd be kind of OK with it if the Garland deal happens, and Pettitte did not pitch for Houston in 2007.
Although certainly you'd have to say that an offseason that nets us both Garland AND Pettitte--in addition to Lee and what now must be seen as the bargain-basement signing of Woody Williams--would be one you can write home to mom about.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
Yeah,
by ReLaunch on Dec 7, 2006 2:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Williams Says "Move Along. .
Apparently unaware that he was making a liar out of Tal Smith, White Sox GM has told MLB.com "we've got nothing going on."
The article goes on to quote Smith as saying the Astros and the Sox were "still working on it."
by rastronomicals on Dec 7, 2006 3:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just In Case It's Not Dead

Pettite and Garland posted nearly identical ERA-pluses at the age of 26; Pettite has a clear advantage in career ERA+, and Garland hasd one less so in WHIP. I think it's pretty safe to say that Graland in 2007 will be a better pitcher than Pettitte in 2007, but that Pettitte at 26 had a brighter future than Garland does at the same age.
by rastronomicals on Dec 7, 2006 3:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Impressive,
by ReLaunch on Dec 7, 2006 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garland = Overrated
Deal sounds ok to me unless Hirsh is involved because garland will give you innings.....
However, I would miss watching Taylor give up some moonshots..
by jakechap20 on Dec 7, 2006 3:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Man
Plus, he was in Ace Ventura, Pet Detective.
No one-hit wonder he, the m*****f***** had range

by rastronomicals on Dec 7, 2006 10:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
by jakechap20 on Dec 7, 2006 10:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pettitte
I mean we'd be paying Garland $22 million over two years, and there's nothing I can think of that would tie him to Houston so why would he resign beyond that? I mean it's clear he'd likely give us a better two year than Pettitte, but is that marginal benefit worth 3 young players? I say no.
I think the strategy now is to go hard after Pettitte, give him the money and the years because, after all, he (in my opinion) gave us our money's worth over the last 3 years and I'd rather overpay a little than to give away so many prospects for a 2-year lease.
by Kian on Dec 7, 2006 4:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I heard the discussion
by littlevisigoth on Dec 7, 2006 6:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
guess "/?"
by littlevisigoth on Dec 7, 2006 7:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew the second Hirsh was mentioned
Not for a pitcher like GARLAND!
by Shamus on Dec 7, 2006 9:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















