Bagwell for the HOF!
I just wrote an article on Jeff Bagwell's Hall of Fame credentials at Beyond the Boxscore
Be sure to check it out and give your opinion on whether or not Bags deserves to be a first ballot Hall of Famer come 2010 at the earliest if he really does retire this year.
Bags is one of my all-time favorites, and if I had a BBWAA vote I'd definitely cast one on him come election day.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Bagwell
I wrote a reply at Beyond the Boxscore, here,, but I'll go on a little further here, and say that watching Bagwell decline the way he has, because of the reason he has, ranks very high on the list of Saddest Things I've Ever Seen.
For almost five years now, my little baseball card shrine to Bagwell over at Astroland has read, "An Unquestioned First Ballot Hall of Famer," and I have never seen any reason to change that wording.
I do however sometimes wonder if everyone sees it in the same way. Bagwell did so many things well--he took a pitch, he played defense, he ran--but it's the home runs that people are gonna focus on. And that's kind of a discredit, because the era in which we watch the game kind of says that players are gonna pass him in that regard. Never mind that they won't play defense as well, or run as well, or be as consistent, or be as smart; they'll pass him in homers, and because people (and maybe voters?) are so fixated on the home run, the memory of his career, will suffer for it.
So, yeah Bagwell SHOULD definitely be a first ballot Hall of Famer, because of how he dominated the era in which he played. But sometimes, I wonder whether he actually WILL be.
by rastronomicals on
May 13, 2005 1:30 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My fear
by joeficarra on
May 17, 2005 6:45 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Certainly
by rastronomicals on
May 18, 2005 9:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hall of Fame
by Caleb on
Jun 1, 2005 8:04 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Huh??
"The first ballot HOF has been diminshed, IMO, by guys like Sandberg."
First off, Sandberg wasn't first ballot, but even if he was, what does that have to do with Bagwell? In 50 fewer games, Bagwell has 200 more runs, 80 more doubles, 160 more homers, 15 points of batting average, and 36 points of OPS + on Sandberg.
And yes, Sandberg was a second baseman, but Bagwell fielded his position until 2001 anyway outstandingly, and stole 100 more bases than Sandberg to boot.
I agree with you about cheapening the first ballot, but I don't think Bagwell would, if only because of the multi-dimensioned nature of his game. Throughout his career he simply did more than most first basemen, even ones who can make Hall claims for themselves.
by rastronomicals on
Jun 1, 2005 10:48 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Spreadsheets
by Marc Normandin on
Jul 17, 2005 7:06 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs



















